lydamorehouse: (ichigo freaked)
 I'm a little bummed. 

On my writing accountablity Zoom, a couple of the other authors were talking about having gotten information about panels for the Seattle WorldCON. I had a surge of panic because I had not. I thought maybe I missed a deadline for a questionaire or... something.

Turns out, no. I'm just not being considered. But then, apparently, hardly any Americans are.

When I reached out, I got an immediate response from programming, which read: "We're just now getting our virtual program off the ground, and we haven't sent out any virtual invitations yet at this point - only invites for the in-person convention.  For the virtual program, we're prioritizing our Hugo finalists, and soliciting panels from groups and conventions in other parts of the world - bringing the world to Worldcon, if you will.  At this time, we don't anticipate a larger call for panelists for the all-virtual program, but will keep you in mind if that occurs."  

I mean, to be fair, I'd love to have attended in-person.  I have a bunch of friends out Seattle way! However, I just can't afford airfare and hotel.

But, I mean, I never can. 

I was finally enjoying the era where money was not a barrier to participation and panelling for me. But, like all good things, it seems to have come to an end. Or.... maybe I'll still luck out and get on something? Seems doubtful, though, since if my name is on a list of other virtual-only attendees, I'm not nearly as current or famous as a WHOLE lot of others, who, very deservedly, will get picked over me. 

I'm just sad because this seems to be primed to be the first WorldCON since New Zealand that I will have virutally attended, but not been on any programming at all. (To be fair, I skipped DisCON for some reason that I no longer remember--might have been timing, because I think that one got moved to January or something??--and Chengdu for political ones.)

I signed up very late for New Zealand because once they had to pivot to all virtual, it finally became an option! That one was a lot of fun. I am hopeful that I'll still be able to have some fun as an attendee. I mean, I guess I'll be getting the international panels, which is cool? 

I mean, I guess it's not entirely over for me, but it certainly feels that way. 

Alack! Alas!
lydamorehouse: (Default)
 My deepest apologies. I've been busy doing the things I do, including the podcast.  

I did a lot of TTRPGing since the last time we chatted. I ran a D&D game on Saturday, played in a somewhat disasterous Star Trek: Adventures game that same night, and ran a Thirsty Sword Lesbians game Tuesday night. I don't game nearly as often as this list makes me seem. I just swear to all the gods that whatever day my D&D group has agreed to play that month, I also have Star Trek game that same night. Likewise, the TSL group will just somehow fall in the same week. I literally play/run at least TWO of these three games MONTHLY. How they all end up clustered like this is, indeed, a mystery. 

I'm also in the last few hours of nominating for the Hugo's. I pulled the trigger and bought virtual tickets to Seattle WorldCON at the same time. When I virtually attended Glasgow's WorldCON, one of the tech guys told me that they'd be using a lot of the same program/technologies and I hope that's true. I found the virtual version of that con particularly robust and, perhaps more importantly, decently inuitive to use. 

I should also report that part of my lack of communication/updatery here is the fact that Mason is home for Spring Break. He's currently off at a coffee shop working on his senior thesis, so, if y'all are so inclined, I'm sure he could use white light and thoughts and prayers. ;-) My understanding of his thesis work is the intersection of science fiction and environmental justice. I mean, pretty cool stuff!  And perfectly aligned with his majors, which are, in fact, English and Environmental Studies. 

Otherwise, how the heck are you all? 
lydamorehouse: (Default)
 OMG, this is a long convention. However! My part in it is now, officially, over.

I was once again up at the crack of dawn in order to Zoom into a panel live in Glasgow. So, I'm probably going to be a crispy critter for the rest of the day. 

So, okay, let's see. Yesterday, I had one panel at 4 pm locally, which put it directly in conflict with the end of the Hugo Awards Ceremony. Because I wanted to see how [personal profile] naomikritzer would do, I had my iPad open to the YouTube channel next to me on the table while I was in the online green room. I am happy to report that she won NOT ONE, but TWO Hugos Sunday night!  Well done, Naomi!!  (And all before I had to go live and  concentrate on my panel, so thank you Powers That Be for that little gift.)

Anyway, because it was Sunday and because I'd had a Star Trek: Adventures game the night before, I will admit that I didn't attend a lot of paneling beyond my own. I did watch on Replay in the CircleCentral hub "Through an African Lens" (panelists:  Lauren Beukes, T.L. Huchu, Wole Talabi -- Yvette Lisa Ndlovu was also supposed to be there, but either had unsurmountable tech issues or, like some folks, miscalculated the time difference.)  It was interesting because they talked a lot about something I didn't know about, but have always suspected. According to the panelists, there is a real, if possibly unconscious, attempt to curate the kinds of stories that come out of The Continent. Some of these authors more speculative and city-centric work was considered "not marketable," in part because the Western audience doesn't tend to remember that some of the largest and most modern cities in the world are on The Continent. The West is still very much attached to the rural, giraffe roaming monolithic image of Africa. Which is just insane to me in 2024, but there you have it. 

I mentally bookmarked a panel about Solarpunk that I'm hoping to catch before they close down the member portal. I should probably watch it today sometime, since I don't know how long they intend to keep any of our various features functional. 

Before my Sunday afternoon panel started, I got some homemade pizza dough rising, so that, once I was finished with my panel at five (local time, 'natch), I could pop a deep dish into the oven for all of us, which was a very delicious choice on my part, I must say. (It turned out really well!)

The Sunday panel itself was not my best performance. I will take full responsibility here. If I am willing to yell at the clouds in the direction of Big Name yesterday, I do the same to myself: I should have prepared better. As far as I'm concerned a panelist as two jobs: show up on time and be fully prepared to talk about the subject at hand. I was on time. I failed the other one. Not spectacularly? But enough.

The title was "Help! I Was Reincarnated as a Worldcon Panel!" and was about a type of Japanese portal or another world fantasy manga and anime called isekai. I am, admittedly, a casual fan of isekai--but it turns out there were only three of us on that panel and NONE of us were fully prepped to do the heavy lifting. I feel pretty embarrassed about that. I had about a half-dozen titles ready, which might have been fine in a panel of four or five? Honestly, had I remembered there were only three of us, I would have had a bigger list of names of anime and manga ready and at hand. I probably should have just opened up Wikipedia to "manga type: isekai" in the middle of the panel, you know? But, I didn't.

And so we did flounder a bit.

On top of that, it never helps that, on any given anime/manga panel (unless it's about a single title), the Venn Diagram of "what I've seen" and "what the other panelist are familiar with" often has ZERO overlap. Anime is just too huge a category even when you narrow it down to a single "type" like "anime about food" or "anime about life in another world." Thus one of the big points I had been hoping to make about how difficult it is to actually define isekai fell flat because *gasp* (but also no surprise) I was the only panelist familiar enough with Bleach to make the point I wanted to argue... which is that this fighting manga, Bleach, goes to another world very often and has lots of other markers in common with isekai as a genre, but it is decidedly NOT isekai by anyone's definition. Why, right?  So, obviously, I'd been hoping to go from there to spark a deeper discussion... but instead I was met with, "Huh, I don't know Bleach well enough to say one way or another." Well, okay, that might be true, but that reply doesn't exactly foster the conversation I was hoping for because explaining the entire plot of Bleach is not only off-topic, but also, in my case, likely to go WAY off into the weeds. So we just sort of let my thought hang there awkwardly. At this point, something happened to the panel's chemistry. Like, it became clear that we weren't picking up with others were putting down. If you were to watch it, you would definitely see me doing that thing that happens when there's no clicking between panelists were I say, "Did that actually answer your question?"

It was just generally like that.

Again, this probably felt WAY worse to me as a panelist than how it "read" to the audience. 

This morning I Zoomed into to "If I'm Not Kira and You're Not Kira, Who is Writing in the Death Note?" which was a celebration of the fact that last year marked the 20th anniversary of the debut of Death Note's serialization in Weekly Shounen Jump Magazine (December 2003). I was initially quite worried about this panel because I had not heard much from the moderator other than receiving an invite to a Google Group and, honestly, I had to wonder what is there left to say about Death Note that hasn't already been discussed to death?  But, I think it actually went very well. I mean, maybe if you watched it, you'd be like, "Why does Lyda think THIS is a better performance from her than what she did on the isekai one??" But, I think it really is about panel chemistry--at least from the inside. The people on this panel all had very good, thought-provoking ideas. Yeah, it's true that I was kind of just along for the ride in many ways, but it was a good ride. 

That's a wrap, folks!

I would say that, generally, I found the Glasgow WorldCON online experience to be a good one. I am a bit disappointed that I only managed one hangout in RingCentral with people I didn't know very well. I did only try to recruit twice, however (and if you look at it that way my success rate was 50%!)  Maybe if I'd had more energy on Sunday, I might have been able to drum up another meet-up. But, for whatever reason, people just weren't checking in there.

Even so, given that the majority of this conference was in-person, I felt surprisingly well-connected to the whole thing. It was BY FAR the best hybrid experience I've ever had as a panelist. I might feel differently about all of this if I didn't have quite so many panels, (It's insane that I, a relative nobody, got 5 panels. There were people way more famous than me with far fewer.)  Although, I don't know. The day I had nothing on, Friday, I really enjoyed watching the livestreams and the RePlay panels. I'm sometimes really terrible about attending other people's panels when I'm physically at a con, so I guess this is one of the benefits for online for me. Also, because it's not "appointment TV," as it were, I can catch panels that were scheduled opposite things I was on or each other. So, that's just kind of nifty, I guess.

For me it was worth the cost, I guess.

Anybody else attend virtually? How was your experience?
lydamorehouse: (Default)
 I had two panels yesterday. I moderated "The Immersive Possibilities of Horror Podcasts" and was on "Everything We Love (a Little or a Lot) about Fan Fiction."

One of these was a disaster. Can you guess which one?

No! The one I moderated went smashingly!  I had a brief moment of panic when I showed up to the panel at the proscribed twenty minutes ahead of time and it was just me and Jennifer Brozak. Jennifer kindly reassured me that, worse case scenario, we could just squee about the various horror audio dramas that we love (which, while I was not prepared for that, I agreed would probably work out fine.) Then another panelist showed up--one who had not shared his e-mail, so once he got everything working, I briefed him on the proposed agenda, my moderating style (hoping for freeform, but, because this was online, might nudge who to go next if no one seems sure who should). Then, when it was still just us three ten minutes to, I sent out a follow-up email saying, "Hey, please log-on if you haven't already. We're about to start!" I did this because Jennifer had been having a very hard time with the time zone calculations and missed a number of panels, including one she was meant to moderate. At any rate, the nudge worked! It prompted a fourth panelist to show up. We went live with the four of us, but not even before introductions were finished, our final panelist came on, profusely apologizing. They were in California and had nearly overslept. 

But, after that, we filled our time perfectly. The questions and answers went well, I think, and, because I had listened to everyone's podcast at least a little, I was able to speak directly to some of the kinds of audio work they did (and remind audience where to find the various shows). I kept a close eye on the time. In fact, I had everyone wrap up so fast that we ended up just shouting recs at the end, which was kind of adorable--at least to me.

It had, I think, the perfect combination of "these people are clearly knowledgeable about their work" and "also real people."

The disaster panel was "Everything We Love (a Little or a Lot) about Fan Fiction." 

I am not going to name names here, but this year's WorldCON seems to have an overarching theme of "there are some Big Names who think the rules don't apply to them." The person on this panel was not as big a name as GRRM, but they were the person on the panel that it's likely most of the audience had heard of, in terms of books sold, current-ness of publications, etc.

But, so, I showed up, as is requested in all of the materials sent out to panelists, at LEAST twenty minutes early. The reason for that is so, like with one of my panelist on the podcast panel, all technical difficulties can be ironed out before the broadcast goes live onto RingCentral. In the case of my previous panel, it took the second panelist a good ten minutes to fully connect properly. He had try something, have it continue to not work, and then totally reboot his entire computer, etc., before it all sorted itself out. He showed up in plenty of time, however. Which is good, because once things go live, the technical support person really has no way to talk to the panelist in trouble, except through the private chat (which you can only see, if you're logged in correctly) or via email. 

But, so, back to the fanfic panel...

When I come on, the technical support person asks me if I've done a panel like this before. I assume (correctly) that what she means is, "Have you used Steamyard yet at the con?" I say, yes, in fact, I just came off a Steamyard panel that I moderated. She asks if I had any technical issues during that panel, and I say, I did not, one of our panelist did, but it was all sorted before we went live, thank you all for your amazing work (<--like you do.)

Big Name swans onto the panel five minutes ahead of launch. The tech assistant who is still on the screen at this point asks very nicely to Big Name, whether or not they've done this kind of online panel before. They fully misinterpret the question and seem vaguely insulted to be asked, as there is a hair toss and, "This ain't my first online con rodeo."

WHELP. 

Maybe you spoke too soon, Big Name.

Because almost immediately Big Name starts having technical problems. They seemed to kind of have it working, we go live, but then--of f*cking COURSE--proceeded THOUGHOUT THE ENTIRE PANEL pop in an out or be distractedly mouthing swears, etc., etc. 

We tried to carry on?

However, any time we'd start to get a thought going, Big Name would be there with an "Ah! I'm back!" seize a few seconds, and then, inevitably, drop back off. Or worse, come on and bring with them this terrible beeping sound that caused at least one of the other panelist to have to remove their headphones (as I think they were particularly noise-sensitive and so the sound likely physically hurt them.) 

You know how this could have been solved, Big Name?

BY ATTENDING THE ONLINE TRAINING SESSION LIKE THE REST OF US.

I lost sleep in order to go to one of these. I got the time wrong and ended up staying up late only to realize that 2 am in Glasgow Monday, was actually a time in my time zone on SUNDAY--so I'd missed the training by a full day. Apparently, a lot of other people made this mistake, and so Glasgow kindly sent out another set of options for training. I carefully did the calculations for that and attended just so someone could walk me through how it would work and to get tips like, "Steamyard really plays best with Chrome, so if you don't have it, please consider temporarily installing it," etc., etc. 

And, yeah, one of the things they "trained us" on was Zoom, which many people are sure they're fully comfortable with, but I knew that Zoom was only for the hybrid panels and every single one one of these proprietary online meeting spaces, like Steamyard, has some kind of special foible, so I was there to learn about Steamyard... and, yeah, as it happens, it's also simple enough, but I'm still glad I went. I feel that not only did my attendance show respect to the tech folks, but it also gave me a chance to to listen to all of their specialized knowledge and to be able to ask question directly about how hybrids would function, what was good to know about Steamyard and all of that.  I also just, personally, feel less nervous knowing that I've done all I can to make sure my end of the con goes smoothly. 

Maybe Big Name really is all that busy and couldn't make any of the half-dozen training sessions. Okay, then. SHOW UP AHEAD OF THE PANEL WHEN YOU WERE ASKED TO. They built in thirty full minutes between online sessions in a single room so that problems like this could be fixed well-ahead of going live. 

I don't know who Big Name is blaming at the end of the day, but I'm sure if they are complaining it's in the vein of, "The tech side of WorldCON was a mess! Why do these cons always have to have a different system for their online things!!??" like this isn't ENTIRELY their fault. 

Fill out the form if you want to be on programming, George.

Go to the tech sessions, if you want your online experience to be smooth, Other Big Name.

It's not that hard, people. In fact, it's the LEAST you can do.
lydamorehouse: (Default)
 I had no paneling today, so I just attended panels and such.

The first panel I watched live in RingCentral was "Faeries in Fantasy Literature," with Amal El-Mohtar (mod), Frances Hardinge, Holly Black, Jo Walton, Terri Windling. A vey star-studded panel, though I didn't know that when I jumped in (the Glasgow folks are really expecting online members to mainly use their member portal, I think. That seems to be where all the pertinent information is, and they don't repeat it elsewhere.) At any rate, it was an interesting panel. I have perhaps never confessed this here, but I've long had an intellectual crush on Frances Hardinge ever since I read Cuckoo Nest and The Lie Tree, the later of which is my favorite. She did not disappoint by explaining that one of the reasons she writes about changelings is because for whatever reason she had a childhood anxiety around doppelgangers and copies. She then proceeded to recount an amazing dream in which she was in her house, playing with her sister, when the phone rings. Naturally, she got up to answer it, and when she did she discovered it was her sister on the line, saying, "Where have you been? We've been looking all over for you!" And of course, she would wake up then wondering, if that was her sister, who had she been playing with all this time???

TERRIFYING.

And, of course, told much better by her. 

It sort of stopped the panelists for a while, because everyone was sort of processing the images she's brought up. 

After that panel ended, I cast around for stuff to do. I tried out connecting to the RingCentral hangout rooms, but no one was ever in them. My schedule reminded me that I had wanted to maybe watch, "Watching, Playing, Performing TTRPG Play." I really thought this one would be right up my alley, but it wasn't. There wasn't anything inherently wrong with the topic or the panelists, but I just wasn't feeling it. 

So, I went back to those hangout rooms at RingCentral. I tried popping into one and sitting around, hoping that the (1) under Books might bring people in, but it did not. So, I left and went over to the WorldCON Discord and on the meet-up channel just said, "Does anyone want to virtually hangout with me in RingCentral's Book channel?" And An Gry from my Food in Anime panel right away showed up to say. "Oh! Pick me!" so I quick hopped back in and we chatted for a good half an hour about her life in Bangkok, Pacific Rim fandom and fanfic, and other rambling bits of each other's lives.  After a while, C. L. Polk also joined us for a bit, but before we could get too much into it with C.L., Mason came down stairs and I realized it was noon and I hadn't eaten anything at ALL yet. So, I begged off to go make lunch. 

After lunch, I had much worse luck. I hopped into "Gods and Faith in Fantasy (Online)."  There seemed to be some technical difficulties with it, however, because only two of the four panelists showed up. I'm not sure if people are having trouble processing the time differences or if there's something wonky about Steamyard. I mean, I suppose it could be both? I am deeply concerned that people are having issues with Steamyard because three out of my five panels are fully online, on Steamyard, including the one I'm somewhat nervous about moderating. I guess we'll see how it all works out! It certainly didn't seem all that difficult to me when I went to the training, but maybe not everyone managed to make it to a training session? C.L. Polk said that if she had any advice about Steamyard, it was that you need to be very careful logging in, because once you choose your options, you can't un-choose them. Which is good advice!  The written instructions do suggest that you test all of your equipment before accepting the invitation and that was NOT mentioned in the training, so perhaps this is part of the problem.

Anyway, the content of the panel was a bit weird since it wasn't entirely clear if the two panelist could hear each other, either? I was interested in listening to Sonia Salaiman because she writes fiction based on Palestinian folklore, which I know absolutely nothing about. She only told a couple of stories, however. I did learn that in certain folktales in Palestine, jinni are ifrits who were banished by Eve from the Garden of Eden, but prayed for by Adam, and so they aren't fully only spiritual beings, but more like an underground magical race. I was, like, dang, yes this urban fantasy basically writes itself, doesn't it?

That was pretty much my day? I poked around at a few other things, but nothing excited me, and I checked through the Discord for other meet-up possibilities, but nothing much materialized.

Still, it felt like a day at the con, you know? I'm always glad when there are some spontaneous and personal interactions that happen in online spaces, because that really ads to the feeling of really being at a convention.
lydamorehouse: (crazy eyed Renji)
 me "at" Scotland
Image: Me, on a panel at Glasgow WorldCON (hopefully not being too ridiculous.)

First, I have to say that the technical folks behind-the-scenes at WorldCON are INSANELY competent. I'm sooooo impressed. Getting into the panel was seamless. I was really impressed with how, on Zoom, we were able to not only see our fellow in-person panelists, but also a shot of the live audience (so that we could gauge reactions.)  Technically, it could not have been better. I'm sure there will be various technical snafus as the con continues, but this one went off in a way that seemed effortless--though very clearly that just meant well orchestrated. 

My first panel was "Let them Eat! Food in Anime." It went very well--at least from my perspective. I don't think I talked too much. This is a problem/bonus of being on a panel with me. I'm very much a cooperative overlapper, who will get excited and build on what has been said, but, in some ways, Zoom makes it easier for me to 'behave." I can put on the mute and nod along and make my "uh-huh" noises silently, and not be as tempted to leap in. Or if I am tempted, I can just mouth things to myself. I did re-watch a bit of the replay which is available on RingCentral and I *think* I did okay. 

I really loved everyone on the panel. They were all very knowledgeable and I loved that An wore her bear ears! I was telling Mason afterwards: THESE ARE MY PEOPLE.

Plus, I got to have an actual squee moment when someone in the audience mentioned Mr. Villain's Day Off, which I freaking LOVE. And my insane enthusiasm made the audience laugh. So, there is that. 

I'm currently listening to one of the livestream panels "Book Bans and Moral Fascism." 

I was inspired by my positive experience to get my questions and agenda together for the panel I need to moderate, so hopefully that will help them as much as Ryan's outline helped me.

Okay, not much else to report! More tomorrow!
lydamorehouse: (Default)
 It's going okay, I will say. 

SO FAR.

Two days into my super-busy week and I'm still upright!  Plus, I just had an incredibly informative session with the Glasgow WorldCON Online folks that is making me feel pretty confident about my ability to navigate all the technology. I'll be writing con reports once everything starts up on Thursday, but it's going to be interesting for those of us participating as well as attending online. There are THREE ways, technologically-speaking, that I'll be interacting with the con. One is just Zoom. For the hybrid panels, they'll be zooming us into the live event, like is typical. The other one that online participants will be dealing with is a program called Steamyard--which, remembering the complicated Chicago WorldCON interface, I was really nervous about. But, unlike that one, in Steamyard I only have to master exactly three buttons, so I think I'm good, honestly. 

The other one, which is mainly for attendees who aren't on programming, is called RingCentral. I'm actually going to spend some time exploring that one today, because that's where I can decide which panels I want attend as an audience member, etc. It's got all the virtual hangouts and things like the table talks. 

It's a lot? But, it's only Tuesday. I have some time to settle in and figure everything out.

I cancelled my usual podcast recording this morning (it's okay, it would have put us ahead by one, not behind), so that I could spend some time going shopping and making a delicious lunch. I decided to stop by my nearest Asian market, Shanghai Market, to pick up some fun stuff for the upcoming week. I mention this because my first panel is going to be on Food in Anime. I had been complaining to Mason that one of the questions they want the panelists to answer is: what food have you tried that you learned about in an anime. I was, like, "What the heck? I have not done this!" Luckily, Mason reminded me that I sought out taiyaki at our local Obon Festival because it was supposedly Renji (from Bleach)'s favorite food. 

Wikipedia's image of taiyaki

And do you know what they had at Shanghai market?? Frozen taiyaki!  So, I ate a serving size as pictured above as a desert after a soba stir-fry that I made up with veggies that I had around.

I'm trying to think if I've ever tried anything else specifically after having seen it on an anime. A lot of what I've tried, if I recall correctly, mostly came out of the research I did into Japanese food while writing my mega tons of Bleach fanfic. Things like kakigori, tsukemono, and tonkotsu curry, are all things I'm pretty sure I discovered that way. I guess some people on the panel have actually tried following recipes from the actual manga they've watched! I'll be fascinated to hear how that turned out for them.

Last night's programming committee meeting for ConFABulous was... oh boy. Let's just say I solved one problem by offering my Zoom pro-license for the next meetings. I am comforting myself with the fact that these are early days yet, and it might not be as dire as it seems if I'm the most organized person in the room. I am stealth competent, after all. I just don't normally play competent on TV, as it were. (Also, mostly people go to ConFABulous to play games, not go to paneling. It will be FINE.)

So, yeah, generally good so far.

How about you?
lydamorehouse: (ichigo irritated)
PART ONE.

 The first part of which begins like this. I'm going through my online calendar just to make sure that I have all my WorldCON panels sorted out and in the right time zone, when I look at "The Immersive Possibilities of Horror Audio" and I happen to notice...

...I'M THE MODERATOR. 

I'm pretty sure that I had checked that I didn't really want to be a moderator, but, just to be clear, I don't entirely mind. I clearly approved it? And, in many ways, I'm the perfect person to do this since I am NOT a podcast producer. Even Jennifer Brozek, who I'd initially thought was "just" an author, (like me) does a horror flash fiction podcast called Five Minute Stories.

BUT. It feels really weird to moderate a panel if you haven't at least heard of some of the work that the panelists have been involved in? So, I now have a "listening list" (like a reading list, only for podcasts) that includes: Call of Cthulhu Mystery Program, "Mother," She Wrote, The-Channel-Show, and Five Minute Shorts. One of the other people on the panel who didn't include his email seems to produce dozens of award winning podcasts of things like Murder on the Orient Express, Long Night in Egypt, etc. 

Specifically, I am supposed to be discussing the immersive possibilities, which are described thusly: Eerie, unsettling, and spooky tales are a perfect fit for audio dramas. Our panelists converse on modern horror audio dramas, like The Lovecraft Investigations, The Magnus Archives, and Old Gods of Appalachia, and how they use clever sound design, ambient audio, and other audio techniques to immerse their audiences in the world of their stories.

Audio techniques.

Wish me luck, y'all. I know jack all about audio techniques!  But, I suppose that my ignorance is where I will start. What are the basic audio techniques you might use to create atmosphere in your horror podcasts? Why are wind chimes inherently spooky and lonely sounding?

But, so that's kind of the stuff of nightmares. 

Luckily, my panel isn't until Saturday and I can spend some time listening to the various podcasts and thinking up my questions. I do also hope to talk to the panelists about the actual podcasts listed since I'm a huge fan of all of them.


PART TWO.

It's not just WorldCON that is haunting me this week. Let me just go down everything I have to do. Tonight, Monday, at 6 pm, I'm going to be attending a ConFABulous programming committee meeting that I foolishly volunteered to be part of. Actually, I did this last year, too, and it was fine. Unfortunately, I have been feeling incredibly brain dead when it comes to panel ideas for a GLBTQIA+ (mostly gaming) convention. In fact, in desperation, I looked at what is being offered at WorldCON this week, in the hopes that it might at least clue me into what the hot new queer books/podcasts/movies/TV are this year. Alas, WorldCON has a number of queer-focused panels, but.. they don't name their sources!  So, like they're going to talk about Queer Characters in YA Fiction, but they don't say, "like so-and-so in such-and-such." So, I need to spend a least part of today trying to put my finger on the pulse of what people might want to talk about at a queer gaming con. IF YOU HAVE ANY IDEAS, PLEASE COMMENT BELOW. 

Okay, moving on. Tuesday afternoon I have a "how to" training session for WorldCON online. I am also meeting a friend for an online chat later, but that's fun and not work. That will be the carrot to the stick, if you will. I suspect the first will be tedious, but necessary. I always attend these, if possible, because there's always some secret that they forget to tell you in their written instructions that is both obvious and easy to miss. Like, where on the right hand side of the screen the whatever button is. (And we all know how crucial the whatever button is.)

Wednesday I might have started back up with my problematic D&D group because they are running an all warlock mini-campaign, which just sounded too fun to resist. Do I want to talk about this? Maybe, but not today when I'm generally feeling overwhelmed. I promise to post about it in a filtered/locked post.

Thursday, I have my first WorldCON panel at 7:00 AM, and then, exactly twelve hours later, I host my writers' group in-person at my house. My writers group, in their infinite wisdom, has decided that we need to meet in-person again (Congratulations! There's currently a surge in COVID cases across the nation!) I agreed to this with much grumbling because 1) see above (the grumbling), and 2) there has been a lot of noise throughout the years since we had to pivot to Zoom about how hard it is for people to concentrate online, etc., etc., and despite the fact that this has never been true for me, I do believe that it's a real issue for other people and I legitimately want to respect that (the agreeing).   

May I just say? Despite this insistence, we have yet to have an in-person meeting where everyone actually shows up. At least two people have been (or will be) missing every time we do in-person meetings--we've only had one so far, and, to be fair, at least one of the absentees this time is from someone who will be in Glasgow, so I suppose I must forgive. However, I suspect this trend will continue because MOTIVATING YOURSELF TO GET OUT OF THE HOUSE IS HARD. This was my number two reason for not wanting to go back to in-person. (#1 being that COVID is not over, despite how much we want to think it is.)  Luckily, I grumbled loudly enough that we are actually only meeting in-person for half of our regularly scheduled meetings. On the second Thursday of every month, we are in-person, but on the fourth Thursday we are still Zooming. I think that second bit (the Zoom meeting) will actually ensure that our group continues to actually function. We also all agreed that, should it just be easier (snow/weather emergency or what-have-you) we can just shift to Zoom. 

Who knows? Maybe I will press that button Thursday if I feel overwhelmed. 

Friday, thank god, I have nothing on. But then Saturday is my big programming day (including the one I'm moderating!) and I have one panel each, Sunday and Monday of next week. 

AAAAAAHHHHHHH!!

I mean, I am actually incredibly chuffed (as one might say in the UK) about my WorldCON schedule. I'm very pleased and feel very, very lucky to be taking part in so many wonderful panels, but I like to really prepare for panels, so I am feeling like it's finals week, you know?

Okay. I'd better go off and try to figure out what the queer youth of today are up to!
lydamorehouse: (Bazz-B)
 First of all, WorldCON sent out their final schedule today, so now I can officially announce where you can find me (virtually) in Glasgow next weekend (August 8-12).  My panels are online, unless otherwise noted:
 
  • Let Them Cook - Food in Anime (THURSDAY: 1 pm GMT/8:00 am CT) - hybrid
  • The Immersive Possibilities of Horror Audio (SATURDAY: 7pm GMT/2:00 pm CT) 
  • Everything We Love (a Little or a Lot) About Fanfiction (SATURDAY: 10pm GMT/5:00 pm CT)
  • Help, I Got Reincarnated Into a Worldcon Panel! (SUNDAY: 10pm GMT/5:00 pm CT)
  • If I'm Not Kira and You're Not Kira, Who is Writing in the Death Note? (MONDAY: 1pm GMT/8:00 am CT) --hybrid
Three out of the five panels are, as you can see, anime and manga panels, so I guess I have made myself a kind of reputation? To be fair, on the questionnaire when they ask about your specialties, I always point people to my manga review site, so... I reap what I sow, I suppose. And, I'm not really complaining! In fact, I'm thrilled! I am particularly excited to talk about Food in Anime, though, as I told the moderator, I really hope that we can mention manga, too, since that's where most of my favorites exist. 

But, so I have a couple of early mornings, both for hybrid panels. We'll see how this goes. I've had some bad luck with hybrid in the past--not being able to hear the other panelist and basically being Max Headroom in a corner and so not getting called on to participate a lot. But, I am hopeful!

As for reading, expect a lot of manga over the next week and a half!!

This week, of course, it's still been all cyberpunk, all the time. I finished a re-read of Gibson's Nueromancer, as that's the subject of our most recent podcast (which should be dropping later today or early tomorrow), and I started listening to the audiobook for Klara and The Sun by Ishiguro Kazou. I just finished watching Star Trek: Prodigy's second (current) season, and really loved it.  Every time my family looked over my shoulder while I was watching this they had some disparaging comment about the animation, but I thought it was fine. Not my favorite style, but the story made up for it, IMHO. 

In my TBR pile, I have a supposedly cyberpunk graphic novel called Twelve Percent Dread by Emily McGovern, a bunch of random manga that I will now probably dump to read later, since I need to focus on food and isekai (another world) manga. 

What about you?
lydamorehouse: (Default)
 Mason has left the building.

This morning was like old times. All three of us were up before the crack of dawn and bundled into the car. I took Shawn to work first and then, instead of taking Mason to Washington Tech, like the old day, I took him and his backpack (and duffle bag) to the airport. Any minute now, he'll be winging his way back to school in Connecticut. 

We'll miss him.

Per my previous blog, one of the things we did this last weekend was go out to Tavern on Grand, as it will be shuttering some time this year (early June is what the papers said, I think.)  The place was packed, which was a little freaky for us, since we are still avoiding crowds as a general rule and masking in most public places. We decided we really wanted to do it, anyway, so we we masked as much as possible, and managed to have a decent night out. Hopefully, we did not tempt fate. Fingers crossed.

Otherwise, it was a quiet weekend around chez Morehouse. I'm still working on finishing up my gaudy Valentine's quilt. There is so much glitter, so many hearts. I will be surprised if anyone wants this thing when it's finished. But, it is kinda cute? I should have it pieced fully by tonight, so perhaps there will be in-progress pictures tomorrow.

Tonight is going to be a long one. Shawn has a Friends of the Ramsey County Library board meeting tonight that she can't skip. As I am the family chauffer, I will be in attendance as well--just skulking around the stacks, looking for manga to read. I just finished a couple of first volumes. Last time I was stuck hanging out at the library, I was in the grown-up section and picked up Mieruko-chan by Izumi Tomoki, which... I'm uncertain why it ended up shelves with adult materials. The horror elements are reminiscent of Ito Junji, who somehow, always ends up shelved as adult. My biggest guess is that the art style is fairly ecchi? There's a lot of fan service--but, like, not all that much more than you might find in standard shounen manga, many of which are shelved in teens. I really wish I could be a fly on the wall for some of these decisions. I mean, I'd be fine with all the fan-service stuff being shelved as "adult"? or all as "teen"? But, be consistent is all I ask. I mean, maybe something very ADULT is on its way in this series, but volume one was very typical of "girl sees horror stuff."

The other manga I picked up and read the first volume of was a very strange series from the 1970s called Orochi by Umezu Kazuo, I say it's weird because our titular heroine doesn't appear to be human, and clearly has some supernatural powers? Like, she has the ability to reanimate the dead, but isn't aware enough of human nature to understand why this might be a VERY BAD IDEA. I picked up two volumes of this one and will probably try to read the second before I pass too much judgment on it as a series. The library had all five volumes, so if I decide I like it enough to continue, I can read the whole series.

I'm also still doing a few things for Cheryl Morgan at Wizard Tower, but given the Chengdu blow-up, I suspect she's not in a hurry to hear back from me.... https://www.cheryl-morgan.com/?p=29370
lydamorehouse: (Default)
 My last day of Virtual Chicon was actually Saturday, which is two days ago now, but I'll my do my best to recap for those that are interested. 

I had a great couple of panels on Thursday, despite being ten minutes late to the panel I was most excited about "Satoshi Kon: a Retrospective." The panel moderator was Alina Sidorova and she was very kind in that, despite my late arrival, she gave me an opportunity right away to dig into my theories about the transness of some of the reflective images in Kon's work. This sparked a very lively conversation. I think, generally, this was a really great group of individual fans, each with their own unique perspective. I wish, in fact, we'd had more time to explore Osawa Hirotaka's point that Kon, himself, has said that he was deeply influenced by music, and that there is often a connection between art and music. I know nothing at all about music, since I'm not actually much of a fan (I always dread the classic author interview question which is: What kind of music do you listen to when you create? My answer: none, are you nuts? How can I hear my characters talking over someone else's lyrics??? But  NO ONE likes that answer. I'm supposed to have a playlist. I fail playlists.) So, I mean I would like to hear from people for whom music and their art are intrinsically linked, and we ran out of time before we could go deep on that. I was also on that panel with Nick Mamatas, who was also on my later, much more chaotic panel "Noir and SF/F."

The Noir panel was rough for me for a couple of reasons. First, my internet decided to be deeply unstable. Second, while I wrote a noir cyberpunk, I don't actually read or watch a lot of it otherwise. So, every time there was a question like, "What are you reading now in the noir genre that you would recommend?" or "Are there noir SF stories with alien detectives?" I had no clue how to answer. But, luckily, both the moderator T.C. Weber and Nick had a lot to say on pretty much everything (<--I say that with a smile, I really liked the both of them a lot.) Marissa James and I stayed out more often than not, though me more intentionally that she, I think. 

Virtual panels seem to come in a lot of varieties. I actually saw at least part of one "Cyberpunk in Different Cultures" that was set up like an Academic presentation, where each expert actually ran a power point presentation. Then, after each person gave their separate speech, they would come together and discuss as a group. I am not a super fan of this? I mean, I feel it can be quite good if it's a survey topic, like "Cyberpunk in Different Cultures," where what the viewer wants at the end is a list of books or materials to consume.

There are others, like the "Noir" panel where everyone talks whenever they feel like it and it's in constant danger of devolving into chaos, albeit a fun chaos. 

I actually thought that our "Satoshi Kon" panel was a good hybrid in that, while we didn't have a power point prepared, it was clear that each of us had a THING that we wanted to say about Kon's work. But, instead of waiting until the end to discuss, when ideas might get lost, we would each say our piece, have some excited cross talk, and then it would be the next person's turn. I absolutely credit the moderator for being able to orchestrate this kind of discussion. Alina was really good, too, at making sure everyone had an equal voice and ample time to speak. 

It's really hard to make an online panel as fun and informative as an in-person one, but I feel like I had two really decent experiences, even the more chaotic "Noir" one. 

I will say that I find that there's something about video conferencing that makes a lot of panelists into expressionless robots. I don't know what causes this, but some people go really flat, like they're staring into a TV screen. I notice that very few people smile or nod along and that brings the energy down. In an effort to counteract that I always make it my habit to smile, nod, and turn off my mic so that I can say the "uh-huh" noises to myself without breaking up their audio. It's an effort to stay engaged, but it's not that much more of an effort than it is in Real Life (tm) in my opinion. 

I watched the Hugo Award ceremony on YouTube and I have opinions on that, too, but they're probably not for public consumption. The only thing I can say about it is that I think there's something very insular that happened this year. Same people, different award happened more than once. That being said, I was so happy to see Neil Clarke get a Hugo this year. I also want to be clear that I feel everyone nominated was very deserving, winner or not, it's just that... well, I had to wonder this year how much "ah, I know that name!" went into the voting decisions of WorldCon members.  Though who knows what happened given that the Hugo's are decided with the run-off ballot style. Perhaps what I noticed was a matter of people winning a majority in the number 2 ranking. Who knows?

Anyway, it was still lovely to watch. Someone's speech always makes me tear up a little, and this year was no exception.

In other news, I spent far too much time today debating with a reader of my fan work about why I was not writing their favorite character the way they saw them. I tried to answer with the simple, "Because I'm writing my vision of the same character." To which they responded, "But why, though," and then dropped me a (and I kid you not) THREE PAGE GOOGLE DOC letter. The letter might have been more useful to me, but it seemed to mostly be comprised of "Why did you write him this way, when he's obviously this other way?" without any supporting documentation. This is fan fic, show me where you get this idea from canon. I want page number and panel, so I can reconstruct your thought process and reasonably discuss our differing takes on the same moment in canon. I am always, 100% up for that.

Me, discussing Bleach canon:
The conspiracy guy from "Sherlock," I believe
Image: The red string conspiracy guy from "Sherlock," I believe.

It's that, or accept that you just like Soft!Aizen and there isn't canon support for your preference and you don't care (but then don't argue with people who write Hard!Aizen.) 

This person also seemed upset that my story had "an agenda." "You were trying to paint the villain as a good guy!" I had to break it to this fan that every story has an "agenda." It's called a "theme," in your English class. If a writer doesn't have something they're trying to say, they probably will run out of steam before it's finished. But, the theme or agenda it doesn't have to be as big as my exploration of "What if Aizen was evil, but also not wrong about the Soul Society and Ichigo helped him win?" It can be, "What if Ichigo really liked knitting?"

Both of these are "agendas," because the fic writer is probably also saying something about why Ichigo might like knitting or why knitting is cool. In the story, they'll PROBABLY CENTER KNITTING. (This person was really upset that I centered Aizen, and I was like, well, that's because to make the case that Aizen is evil but also not wrong, I have to let him talk about it???) But, the point is, all writing is about SOMETHING. It's also not illegal or wrong for me to want to make a political statement in my fan fic, even if canon doesn't support it. Fic writing, for me at least, is about the exploration. You've got this world you want to play in for some reason, often because you find something gnarly or toothsome in it and you want to chew on it. That, I explained to them, is the point of it all, and what that might end up feeling like is an "agenda."

I have a very bad feeling that I, at 55, might be arguing with someone who is, in point of fact, 12. I am trying to be emphatic, but not rude. Twelve or twenty or two hundred, I felt really compelled to explain that I don't owe anyone their vision of this character we have in common by the happenstance of fandom. This is fan fic. 

If I want to write non-canonical, out-of-character stuff in my fan fiction, I'm actually allowed? I actually prefer to write as in character as possible, but that's my preference. It's not a requirement of the format. 
lydamorehouse: (Renji 3/4ths profile)
As I think I've previously mentioned, I changed from attending Chicon 8 / 80th WorldCON in-person to virtual. I really waffled long and hard about this, but two things factored into my decision to go virtual. First, the pandemic, despite our wishful thinking, rages on. Secondly, this weekend is the same weekend that Mason heads back to Wesleyan University to start his second year of college. Even though my son is a fully grown and capable adult, I would still have been sad to not have been able to see him off to the airport.

I made the switch to virtual just as they were sending out programming. I got an AMAZING initial, draft, in-person schedule:

in-person, draft schedule
Image: my initial draft schedule.

I took a screen shot of it because I figured that when I switched to Virtual that late in the game, it would be beyond hope to be accommodated. I felt that was reasonable given how much WorldCON volunteers have to juggle, I should note, though I was very sad at the prospect. So, I thought, "I shall snap this picture of what could have been and be pleased that I was in the running for so MANY super-cool looking programming items." I was especially sad, at first, imagining that I'd lost the opportunity to talk about anime film director and mangaka, Kon Satoshi.

As I posted a few days ago, I actually have a very robust virtual con schedule. I was inordinately pleased to see that the Kon Retrospective had been shifted fully to virtual. That panel is first thing tomorrow morning and I am psyched. So, I should say that going into this convention I was/am in high spirits.

Yesterday was a bit up and down for me, though.

I was able to attend the "Dress Rehearsal" for programming participants a week ago. Chicon has chosen a new-to-me online conference hosting software called Airmeet. It seems to have been specifically designed to deal with a large volume of conference attendees, and it has a couple of fun features, including a private "backstage" option for panelists to hang out in, pre live panel, to talk. My only frustration is that a new software means a large learning curve for the majority of the attendees and tutorials have been hard to come by. The session I attended, I think, tried to do too much. A lot of us writers had very specific questions about their needs and the staff tried to answer to all of them, in specific, before a general sense of how Airmeet works had really been established. But, it's mostly intuitive to the moderately internet savvy, I'd say?

But, so, okay, my con experience so far...

My virtual con yesterday was a mix of soul-crushing and uplifting, in that order, at least. Thus, I actually ended the day feeling okay about it all?

My Table Talk was the soul-crushing event. I ended up popping into one of the "lounges" that Airmeet has set up for people to gather. There is a specific kind of "help desk" one, labeled: Info. Table Talks are extra confusing on Airmeet, because they are not listed on the on-line schedule. The reason is, of course, that they're not actually PUBLIC events, per se. They're sign-up only. So, anyway, I was a little uncertain how they worked, technically, so I dropped in when no one else was in the Info room/lounge and asked the woman working there if there was anything special, mechanically, that I needed to do.

It was explained to me that when the Table Talk was about to start a notification would show up under "my meetings" and then you could click to join. That seemed very reasonable and so I asked if there was any way to tell how many people had signed up from her end. The Info Woman said no, but an automatic email would have been generated if no one had signed up at all.

Okay, I thought, there's a relief. I hadn't seen one of those.

My publisher from Wizard's Tower Press, Cheryl Morgan, saw me online and popped into the room and complained a bit to Staff Lady about the fact that she had, in fact, tried to join my Table Talk, but the sign-up closed before she could get to it. Apparently, you have to sign up ahead of time by a full day, which mostly makes sense, except apparently the online con stuff wasn't fully available early morning Wednesday. Also a lot of people just coming in did not realize that they should have done so earlier if they wanted to get on Thursday Table Talks. (Cheryl implied but didn't say that this also clearly put international fans at a disadvantage, because a reasonable time to be awake and checking one's con schedule on UK time is very different than Chicago time.) Staff Lady said that they were trying to deal with this by dropping low-attendance Table Talks into the public lounge spaces so that people might be able to spontaneously join the day of, just like you can in-person.

Okay, this is all very important because: no one but Cheryl ended up at my Table Talk.

DEMORALIZING.

BUT I also did not get any kind of email saying that I'd been cancelled, so I have no idea if there were no shows or if people didn't get the joining email when they shifted me to public--because they clearly did. I waited and waited for my "join my meeting" notification to show up and it NEVER did. Eventually, in my panic, I happened to see it materialize in the public lounge spaces, so I was able to join. So, I don't know what happened there. I should have been informed if there were ZERO attendees, and the system shouldn't have counted Cheryl because she missed the official sign-in. Did the shift to public mess up some notification that everyone, including me, should have gotten? I have no idea.

But, on the other hand Cheryl Morgan and I had a lovely talk. In fact, we were able to do some business. She was wondering if I wanted paper copies available for the e-books, and I was like, "Hell yes, why didn't we do it from the start?" So, that's something we'll be doing, which is wonderful. Then, you know, we generally caught up on each other's lives, learning Welsh/Japanese via Duolingo, and all sorts of various mundane things like that. I really like Cheryl as a person? So, even though we were both staring at each other hyper-aware of the empty "room," it wasn't a total waste of time.

My reading, on the other hand, went really well. When I pressed the "go backstage" button, I discovered that my technical assistant was the Airstream Tutorial person, a person named Gail. Gail, it turns out is a HUGE fan of mine, and basically gushed at me about how awesome I am and that was EXACTLY the pick-me-up that I needed after the empty room fiasco. Also, she could tell how many people came to the reading and it was about a dozen, which is, for me, an absolute crowd. I also told Gail that she could record the reading, so if people want to check it out later, it will be available. So, if any of you reading this report are attending virtually or have access to the virtual option, feel free to check it out. 

Afterwards, it occurred to me that the short story I read at the reading should have probably come with some trigger warnings (there's sex work and implied abuse and violence), so I reached out in chat to Gail so that she could at least add those to the recording of the reading and we had another lovely back and forth and I asked her to send me her snail mail so I could send her something, like a signed copy of a favorite book, as a thank you. She was OVER THE MOON. When I got the snail mail address, it came with another lovely, long email telling me all the things she loved about my writing.

So, ultimately, this was very gratifying for my bruised ego.

I would say, in fact, that it all came out in the wash. Because the lack of a crowd at the Table Talk seems to have possibly been the result of some technical error, I don't even REALLY feel all that badly about it.  I notice right now, in fact, that hardly anyone is taking advantage of the lounge option in Airmeet. I've been occupying a table in the so called "Coffee shop" hoping that someone will notice me and drop in, but just sitting here hasn't resulted in anything. I suppose if I want to chat, I'll have to drop a DM to someone in Airmeet and see if they want to virtually hang out. That seems more intrusive than I want to be, however. 

I'm hoping other people will post con reports because I am definitely having a case of FOMO (fear of missing out) over all of this. It would actually help me to hear other people's stories of how it's going for them.

lydamorehouse: (Default)
 I had been slated to attend WorldCON in-person, but a month or so ago, when COVID numbers began to spike, I requested to be shifted to fully virtual. I must have gotten my request in in early enough because I am still on a fair amount of programming. Whoot! So, if you are attending WorldCON/Chicon8 this weekend and have virtual access, here's where I will be:

Thursday, September 1, 2022
 
5:30 PM  Virtual Table Talk - Lyda Morehouse / Tate Hallaway (Airmeet Tables,) Duration: 60 mins
 
7:30 PM Reading - Lyda Morehouse / Tate Hallaway (Airmeet Readings,) Duration: 20 mins


Saturday, September 3, 2022

10:00 AM 
The Legacy and Influence of Satoshi Kon (Airmeet 5,) Duration: 60 mins
Alina Sidorova (moderator), Osawa Hirotaka, Lyda Morehouse / Tate Hallaway, Nick Mamatas
 
Come explore this retrospective on the maker of films like Paprika, Millennium Actress, and Tokyo Godfathers, Satoshi Kon. Often exploring themes of performance, social stigma, and the human psyche, Satoshi's stories have left an indelible mark upon media though focus on the synergy between dreams and reality.
 
7:00 PM Noir and SFF (Airmeet 2,)Duration: 60 mins
Lyda Morehouse / Tate Hallaway, Marissa James, Nick Mamatas, T. C. Weber (moderator)
 
Noir fiction and SFF have similar roots in the pulps, and speculative fiction often uses noir themes—or at least its surface appearance. Our panelists will consider noir's influence on cyberpunk and novels like Miéville's The City and the City or Khaw's Hammers on Bone, and ponder the best uses of the fedora. . . in space! Let's talk about our favorite SFF hardboiled detectives, existential dread, and French cinema.

lydamorehouse: (Default)
 Willow looking out the window
Image: Willow sees something out the bedroom window.

So, I am planning on going to Chicago WorldCON. For one, Chicago! For two, [personal profile] naomikritzer is up for a Lodestar this year (the YA Hugo) for her novel Catfishing on Catnet, and she is my friend and I would love to see her win again (or, you know, hold her hand, if she doesn't.) 

I've been feeling very lucky to have gotten past the various hurtles to be considered for programming. Chicon has announced its first wave of programming participants and... I'm not on it. APPARENTLY, the email I got that sent me to a list to frantically check for my name, implies that there's still another chance for me to be on paneling. So, I guess I am still in the running? I am crossing my fingers.

But, you know, I am disappoint.

Like one is.

Plus, I did not manage to get my novel done by the end of May, so I am feeling generally loser-ish. 

And it's gray and threatening rain, but not actually raining. (The worst!)

WHINE.

So, here are pictures of my cats.

Sleepy orange boy
Image: sleepy orange boy, Buttercup.
lydamorehouse: (gryffindor)
I've been writing to various friends about how I would have run a virtual WorldCon enough that I want to distill my ideas here, in one place.

By now, we all know how disastrous the Hugo Ceremony was, but I have a much bigger and much more... mundane complaint.

I was telling [personal profile] naomikritzer via email this morning that it's clear that the same problem that GRRM has: being hidebound, enamored of the good,old days, etc., affected ALL of ConZealand this year. I suspect it's because they approached the idea of a virtual con the wrong way. They said to themselves, "These are what my favorite things about WorldCON are, so how do I translate that to virtual," INSTEAD of "How do I take the virtual world and import what I love about cons into the way people experience the internet??"

It's a subtle difference, but critical.

Like, what BAFFLED me was that ConZealand, THE WORLD SCIENCE FICTION CON, wasn't 24-hours.

Sure, okay, everything is on New Zealand time, because the main organizers live there, cool, cool, but why the hell not get volunteers in every time zone so that the people in Europe and the African continent could attend at their convenience, instead of having to get up at midnight and attend readings at 2 or 3 am. I mean, yes, there are night owls everywhere, but for fuck's stake, there are also FANS IN EVERY TIME ZONE.

I don't understand why World Con, this year didn't take advantage of that?

Like, also, for much of the world New Zealand is already tomorrow. Make that a theme? "Come to the Future, ConZealand, where is already tomorrow!" and then do a 24-hour con, where in the middle of NZ's night, fans in Germany or Lithuania or Croatia (or all at once) carry the torch by running English-lanugage (or subtitled, because fans could DO this,) panels with their country's biggest SF writers and fans, and then the torch is passed to Zimbabwe and India and Russia, and on and on across the globe until New Zealand wakes up again and can take back the reins?

How fucking cool would that have been?

We could have harnessed the global power of fandom and done something newsworthy for its AWESOME, rather than being called out for transphobic racist bullshit AGAIN.

It just pissed me off that when I woke up at my ungodly hour of 8 am, there was nothing at all to do, officially, at WorldCON. Sure, sure, the Discord was 24 hours, but that's not the same as getting to see a panel in... (let me see who might share a decent time zone with my 8 am with a quick Google) Okay, if I am awake at 8 am in St. Paul, it's a nice decent afternoon 2 pm in Spain, the UK, the Republic of Ireland, Portugal, Morocco, Sierra Leone, Western Sahara, Mauritania, and Algeria, just to name a few.

THINK ABOUT THIS.

I wake up at 6 am and hop over to the WorldCON schedule and see that people are deep into their afternoon over in the Republic of Ireland, so I watch a panel with Irish authors talking about the state of their fandom/pro-dom, and, then, I see that Ethiopia is having a watch party for its famous post-apocalyptic film Crumbs. Mmm, but I can't decide between that and watching the film Afronauts (set in Zambia, directed by a Ghanaian American woman.) After that, I decide to check out science fiction from the Indian sub-continent organized by the Indian Association for Science Fiction Studies®, Bangalore (IASFS), Indian Science Fiction Writers Association. 

You could have issued a downloadable and printable passport that people could have stamped if they attended a panel held in another country/by another country's fandom and encouraged people to try to "catch them all."

Think about how cool this could have been,.

It would have been easy, because it could have been crowdsourced into one of the most active and brilliant group of nerds in the world: FANS.

And it could have been done with just a little forethought and some organization. Put the world out early and ask for volunteers. Tell people, "offer up your SF/F content: movies, fannish clubs, authors" and say, "we will worry about translations once we get some excitement rolling," because you know that if somebody wanted to run an obscure Thai horror film that needed dubs, we could have found someone to do that shit ASAP, and make it available in dozens of languages. We could have contacted folks in Japan about running cosplay or debuting new anime that already has a huge international followers.  

There is stuff out there. It just might not be in English, but that's such a tiny hurtle, if you think big enough.

Also, WorldCon is often a destination con. Where were our local folks running around doing virtual tours of New Zealand natural wonders--stuff New Zealanders are uniquely able to show us, because THEY ARE NEARLY COVID FREE. They could have even showed up people, doing things, together, like going into a bookstore, and live-streaming videos from there. 

For con that invites the world in, it is a shame we didn't think to crowdshare it with the world.
lydamorehouse: (Default)
A view from the lookout near Stillwater, Minnesota, of the St. Croix River.
Image: NOT NEW ZEALAND. Instead, this is a picture from a scenic overlook near Stillwater, MN, of the St. Croix River.

I spent most of the day both yesterday and the day before, NOT "attending" WorldCON. In fact, when Mason admitted to feeling a deep yearn to go on a short road trip, I literally had him put his finger down as I flipped through a new book I bought called "Day Trips From the Twin Cities."

By chance, his finger hit the entry on Taylor's Falls, a town that we had spent some time near on our trip, last year, to Michigan. We'd stopped at the Interstate State Park there. We remembered the landscape as pretty and since Mason did not want to get out of the car at all, it seemed like a perfect destination.

So, we zipped up 35E to Highway 8 and followed that to Taylor's Falls. For those unfamiliar with my lovely state, Taylor's falls is only about an hour away. We crossed over into Wisconsin briefly to try to see if it was possible to see the falls of Taylor's Falls from the car, but it was not. So, we started down the river back towards home, but had a much better experience once we crossed back over and followed highway 95 through Marine-on-St. Croix down into Stillwater.

old school screenshot because my asus was being a butt
Image: old school "screenshot" with my phone because my asus was being a butt.

Exactly what we needed.

I did a little "attending" last night, however, since [personal profile] naomikritzer was up for a Lodestar (as, of course, was [personal profile] yhlee .)  I will tell you that was also somewhat of a disappointment. I mean, Naomi won! YAY!!  But, there were technical difficulties: https://watch.thefantasy.network/the-2020-hugo-awards-livestream/https://watch.thefantasy.network/the-2020-hugo-awards-livestream/  and so she had to stop and restart, and it was like that a lot last night? Plus, following various social media snark, I wasn't alone in thinking that George RR Martin went on a bit too long about the good, old days in between announcing the winners. If you have the patience to watch this whole thing, power to you. I didn't. I wandered off and did several other things, while checking into the Discord server now and again to see who was winning. By chance, I popped back on in time to see another Twin Cities denizen, [personal profile] elisem  win (yay!)

If you're curious who else won what last night, check out https://locusmag.com/2020/07/2020-hugo-lodestar-and-astounding-awards-winners/

After that, I stayed awhile to follow Naomi around to various parties, but I think many of us have forgotten how to people... or all the good conversations happened after I pooped out and went to bed (which, to be fair, again is pretty typical of my in-person WorldCON experience.)


lydamorehouse: (??!!)
Yesterday was my first "full" day at WorldCON/ConZealand. I attended a few programming events on Tuesday night, but not enough to really get a sense of how WorldCON was working for me.  

Now I have a bit more of an idea, and I have to say that I'm not finding WorldCon to be as fun for me as a regular member as Virtual WisCON was.

At least, SO FAR.

I should lay out a few caveats for those of you who maybe don't know much about me outside of my blogs about food and gardening. I am a published science fiction/fantasy author, who had her heyday in the early aughts. My first professionally published novel came out from Roc/Peguin USA in 2001. I won a few awards, was moderately well reviewed, yada yada. I also had a stint in Romanclandia when I switched to writing paranormal romances for Berkley (also a Penguin imprint) in the middle of that decade, (to be precise: 2006,) under the pen name Tate Hallaway. I have a bit over a baker's dozen of books traditionally New York publishing house published and a few that have come out from smaller presses. So, when I say "as a regular attendee," I mean not as a program participant, which is how I experience cons for the most part, even now. The last WorldCON I attended, which was when it was the 2016 MidAmerica Con in Kansas City, MO, I participated as a panelist... and, as it happened, the con wingman of [personal profile] naomikritzer who was up for a Hugo Award... which makes for a VERY DIFFERENT WorldCon experience than most people get.

So, to be fair, my normal experience of cons, even when not palling around with a Hugo nominee, is much more "insider-y" than most. That ABSOLUTELY does taint how connected I feel to a con.

However, I wasn't on any Virtual WisCON panels this year, either, but I somehow managed to find some good Discord chats to join in, I ran into people who knew me, and I felt more "with people" in a way I am decidedly NOT feeling here. Maybe it was having [personal profile] jiawen to watch opening ceremonies with? Or the spontaneous parties, where you could literally stumble into a jitsi meeting that someone organized on the fly? If those are happening here at ConZealand, I am not finding where they are. But, the fact that within minutes of going to the "Concourse Atrium" Discord Channel on the WisCON server I "ran into" several people I knew IRL but rarely get to see really made the Virtual WisCON experience feel startlingly like what happens at meatspace WisCON.

To be brutally honest, I tend to feel somewhat disconnected at Worldcons, so maybe this *is* actually a lot like my normal experience??

So, okay. What I have done so far at WorldCON includes a few panels, but mostly listening to a lot of readings. Those are entirely passive as a non-presenter. You can choose to go into them with your Zoom camera on, but most people go in dark since you're always, automatically muted and expected to stay that way. If you have questions for the reader at the end, you need to use the chat function and I am surprised the extent to which no one does? I do see the chat being used more at panels? Though because there is often a programming track on Discord, a lot of cross-talk seems to actually happen there.

So, I've been watching people read a lot.

I am rarely a fan of readings, so it's been pretty passive and pretty boring. Charllie Jane Anders did her level best to make her reading into a highly enjoyable performance piece, but I did not feel like I was in a room with her, and I'm not entirely sure why not. Maybe the room I'm set up in is kind of hot and stuffy? I don't know.

I tried hanging out in the con bar channel on Discord, but part of me got really irritated by the fact that I paid $190 dollars to watch someone I don't know type: "I've poured myself a Scotch. Wish I had cheese stix." 

The hallway wasn't much better.

I mean, this is partly how text channels on Discord servers WORK? I am a long time Discord user, so it wasn't just the chat function that bugged me. It very much may be an issue of the attendance fee? It's one thing when your expectations are low because you paid what feels like a more reasonable amount (I  choose to spend $30 on Virtual WisCON, though I could have attended for free). I am currently UNCERTAIN  how my $190 is being spent on Virtual WorldCON right now.

To be perfectly fair, I have NOT tried to join a voice and/or video channel on Discord. I do see that people are breaking out into those and I suppose that's where I'll find the WorldCON version of the spontaneous parties. I may just have to be brave and break into one of those or try starting one and seeing who might show up.

I did give myself a tour of the Art Show, while waiting for Charlie Jane Anders's reading to start, and that was okay and I even lingered on one piece and considered buying a print of it, but then I decided Shawn would kill me if I actually bought one of those cat and dragon type pictures. But it was really pretty. If are registered and you go, I recommend "Calico," because it's just a wintery scene with two calico colored creatures, one a cat, the other a dragon.... it's just nicely done.

I sort of tried to wander the dealer's hall. They do have it set up in a way that you can just click through the dealer's web pages in a way that almost sort of mimics the experience of wandering through a hall, but, like in real life, I hit two costume sellers in a row and I was like, "I'm not going to hit buy on any of this, what am I even doing?" and so bailed out.

I did go to one of the "Party Bands," because I was one of the featured guest at the Wizard Tower Press party yesterday. I had a hour where I was sort of a panelist, in that I did a reading and answered Q+A afterwards for the first hour of a Zoom breakout room/the party. I shared that party with Juliet E. McKenna and so I stayed to hear her reading and listen in to the afterwards. I felt that I had a really lovely conversation with people around the world about how f*cking cool birds are (flying dinosaurs!) and that very much a WorldCON experience because I learned that parrots are invading the south of France from someone French, living in the South of France. So, I mean, that kind of stuff is always awesome. I am absolutely the sort of person who enjoys the kind of rambling conversations you can get at Zoom parties with strangers and adding an international dimension was, for me, extra awesome.

So, I am having some fun?

So far, my favorite thing about WorldCON is seeing into the apartments/houses of people in OTHER COUNTRIES. During the training session on how to get the most out of ConZealand, I spent an inordinate amount of time trying to see what was all happening in the background of a Japanese couple's... apartment? (It was small enough that at one point, the lady got up to get her and her male companion cups of tea and she only went partly out of the screen.) And I was like, holy shit, Zoom meetings are a house snoop's DREAM.

I admit that probably makes me a little creepy? But at one point during the Wizard Tower party Martha Hood's parrot wandered along the back of her couch, and, I  had to private message her on the Zoom chat because we had just been talking about birds and she failed to mention that SHE ACTUALLY OWNED ONE AS A PET. (I couldn't just talk to her about it because this happened in the middle of someone else's reading time.)  

I mean seeing other people's pets is always cool.  

But I  keep coming back to the fact that I paid $190 to do this.
lydamorehouse: (Default)
 Some time ago, I registered for CONZeland, the 78th World Science Fiction Convention.... which begins today in North America, because it is already tomorrow in New Zealand.  

I spent a surprisingly large portion of the day yesterday trying to figure out WHEN things were happening and how to sync my Discord account to their Discord channel and get set up with their other concurrent systems.

I was hoping to be able to download my schedule into my Google calendar so everything would show up completely in CDT, (GMT-6,) but if that was possible, I never figured it out. In fact, I just wrote down everything, translated to my time, on a piece of PAPER. Because, while they *did* have a way to show your time on panel descriptions, the problem was that I could never get the full schedule to appear that way. If I wanted to see *my* time zone shown, I'd have to click through to each full panel description individually. I mean, I'm glad it was there AT ALL? 

Still, this means the list under "my schedule" is pretty useless as something to quickly refer to.  And the time slots, even translated to my time zone, all appear in military time, and, as someone whose dyslexia also effects numbers, I can not easily remember what time 1800 hours is, even if you're just saying,"D'uh, Lyda, subtract 12!" That just doesn't happen easily in my head, I have to write it down to do the math, by hand, each time.

So now I have my scribbled notes. 

That should work just fine. 

This is only important because I have ONE thing that I absolutely MUST attend tomorrow (my Wednesday, New Zealand's Thursday) my UK publisher, Wizard Tower Press, is hosting a party for their authors, which includes me, and I am doing a reading for them at 2 pm (CDT.GMT-6).  IF you are also attending WorldCON, please come? 

My publisher's press release, regarding the event: https://www.cheryl-morgan.com/?p=28097

I will be reading from my newest release, Unjust Cause, which you can buy here: https://wizardstowerpress.com/books-2/books-by-tate-hallaway/unjust-cause/ or anywhere fine books are sold. This book can come to you as paper, hardcover, or e-book. /advertisement.

I have actually not yet checked to see how the party rooms operate. Are they Zoom? Are they Discord voice/video channels? This is going to matter because I'm going to have to figure out which computer to use, because not all of mine have the same processing power. If there is more than one "room" in a Zoom meeting, it has previously (at the Nebula parties I attended)  not been possible to navigate independently from my iPad, whereas it is/was, when I use Mason's old computer (which, technically, is one of mine now.)

Ah, virtual cons. 

I mean, I have really loved them? I really loved the way the Nebula parties were structured and WisCON was a blast. but, there is always this tech adjustment to be made at the start.

Hope to see you there!
lydamorehouse: (ichigo being adorbs)
Since all the cool kids are posting theirs, here's my MidAmericaCon II / WorldCON schedule:

Wednesday Aug 17, 2016
7:00 PM
The Interstices of Historical and Fanfiction 1 hour | 7:00 PM - 8:00 PM, Kansas City Convention Center, 2204
Lyda Morehouse | Dr. Heather Urbanski (Fitchburg State University) | Ms Sumana Harihareswara | Teresa Nielsen Hayden
Historical fiction is a work of literature, comic, film, or television program set in the past. Fanfiction is a work of fiction produced by fans for fans, using famous people or source texts as their inspiration. Frequently the worlds overlap. Let's discuss the overlaps, benefits, and pitfalls of working in these genres. The overlaps include writing fanfiction about historical fiction, setting fanfiction in an alternative universe by placing the narrative in a different historical era, fanworks about real-life historical figures (Historical RPF), or historical fanworks -- any fanwork set in the past.

Thursday Aug 18, 2016
12:00 PM
What is a Fan Writer? 1 hour | 12:00 PM - 1:00 PM, Kansas City Convention Center, 2206
Lyda Morehouse | Rich Lynch | Mr. Guy Lillian | Foz Meadows | Goldeen Ogawa | Teresa Nielsen Hayden
What we mean when we say: Fan Writer. Is it a professional writer doing some work for free? Is it a way of life? Some say that the internet made us all fan writers. What does (and doesn't) this term encompass, is it a tradition, and how has the interpretation changed over the years?

Thursday Aug 18, 2016
10:00 PM
Anime Stories to Watch in the Dark 1 hour | 10:00 PM -11:00 PM, Kansas City Convention Center, 2504B
Lyda Morehouse | Mr. John Wiswell
When one hears "anime", horror may not be the first thing to come to mind. This panel might change that. Don't be scared, and join us as we explore horror in anime.

Friday Aug 19, 2016
11:00 AM
Living in a Cyberpunk Society 1 hour | 11:00 AM -12:00 PM, Kansas City Convention Center, 2208
Catherine Lundoff | Takayuki Tatsumi | Lyda Morehouse | Allan Dyen-Shapiro | Ms Pat Cadigan
We may not be able to jack in directly, but we are part of the Cyberfuture. When technology thrives but society decays, seemingly dystopic worlds arise. To what extent is our world a cyberpunk universe and what more can we expect to happen to take us there?

Friday Aug 19, 2016
1:00 PM
Autographing: Jeanette Epps, Alex Jablokow, Lyda Morehouse, Lawrence M. Schoen, Mary A. Turzillo 1 hour | 1:00 PM - 2:00 PM, Kansas City Convention Center, Autographing Space
Jeanette Epps | Alex Jablokow | Lyda Morehouse | Dr. Lawrence M. Schoen | Dr. Mary A. Turzillo Ph.D.

Saturday Aug 20, 2016
10:00 AM
Complexity of Character: Coming Out in Teen Spec Fic 1 hour | 10:00 AM -11:00 AM, Kansas City Convention Center, 3501B
Catherine Lundoff | Mark Oshiro (Mark Does Stuff) | Lyda Morehouse | Jaylee James
Young adult speculative fiction is doing a fairly good job of featuring a diverse and varied cast of characters, but books that feature LGBT, asexual, and nonbinary characters are still not always easy to find. Let’s talk about what books and characters are out there, and what themes and identities are still underrepresented in YA SF? What challenges do spec fic authors face when writing and publishing books about teen sexuality and love? Beyond the main characters, what roles do the secondary and tertiary characters play in helping to advance the conversation about teen sexuality?

Saturday Aug 20, 2016
12:00 PM
Comics on the Small Screen 1 hour | 12:00 PM - 1:00 PM, Kansas City Convention Center, 2503B
Terrence Miltner | Melissa F. Olson | Pete Balestrieri (University of Iowa) | Mr Lee Harris | Lyda Morehouse
From Batman in the 60s to The Incredible Hulk in the 70s to The Flash, Jessica Jones and Supergirl, we do love our superheroes on the box. But why do some comic heroes make a successful transition to the small screen and others tank on arrival, or even before?

Saturday Aug 20, 2016
1:00 PM
Representation in Comic Books: From Absences to Affirmatives 1 hour | 1:00 PM - 2:00 PM, Kansas City Convention Center, 3501B
Anna Raftery (TAFF) | Ms Sumana Harihareswara | Lyda Morehouse | Bill Campbell (Rosarium Publishing)
Bitch Planet gives us a larger woman who is proud of her body, the Lumberjanes show queer teenage romance, Hawkeye is deaf, and yet Oracle was ejected from her wheelchair and became Batgirl again, echoed in the TV series Arrow, where Felicity Smoak was 'fixed' by science. Our panel discusses representation within comics, where we are succeeding, how representation is moving forward, and where it still needs to avoid harmful stereotyping, assumptions or tokenism.

Saturday Aug 20, 2016
5:00 PM
Yaoi and Yuri: Japanese Graphic Romance 1 hour | 5:00 PM - 6:00 PM, Kansas City Convention Center, 2205
Lyda Morehouse | Lauren Schiller | Jaylee James
*The nature of this session may result in adult themes being discussed.*
Fans of manga, graphic novels, romances, and LGBT characters – come learn about yaoi and yuri; terms for manga about m/m and f/f romance, respectively. This introductory session discusses where you should start. We also discuss some of the debates around the representation of gay characters in these comics, and the wider impact of these manga.

lydamorehouse: (crazy eyed Renji)
Catherynne M. Valente has weighed in on the Puppies and the Hugos this morning (edited to add: apparently this came out awhile ago but was being passed around FB yesterday). I haven't read all the words because I'm suffering a bit of Hugo neepery burnout. That doesn't mean I've stopped thinking about it. In fact, I'm having some thoughts about it that are probably... I'm not sure what, but no one on my "side" is talking about it as far as I can tell.

Obviously, everything about what the SP/RP did to this year's Hugo was wrong with wrong sauce. But, I've been thinking a lot about why anyone sympathize with them, ever, under any circumstances. I don't think it's as simple as a lot of people want to paint it. It's super-easy to decide the whole lot of them are racist (and in Beale/Vox's case, that's not at all unfounded.) But, if that were the only motivator, I don't see how they'd have quite as much traction. Okay, maybe I'm being naive here. Clearly race relations are broken in the US, so maybe that's enough to fuel this kind of thing... but, okay, really? I just want to talk about ANOTHER aspect.

In Larry Correia's back and forth with George R. R. Martin, Martin vehemently denies that there are 'cool kids' in SF/F. He's wrong. Because, of course there are. Whenever you get a group of people together, cliques happen. That's just the nature of humanity and group dynamics.

Correia whines a lot about feeling shut out, and, while I think it all amounts to a load of man pain, I actually sympathize with him a little, on a basic human level.

I GET feeling left out of that inner circle, particularly at somewhere as huge as a WorldCON. I spent all of 1998 Baltimore WorldCON feeling like I was forever just one step from the parties everyone was talking about the next day. You'd go to a panel the next morning and hear Gardner Dozois laughing about how Warren Lapine shot a pickle out his nose (or visa versa) and I'd think: What? Where? When? How come *I* wasn't invited!??

Baltimore, it should be noted, was particularly egregious that year because of some corkage law or other that messed up how and where alcohol could be served and so there were A LOT of rumors of "secret pro parities" where the free beer flowed freely. I was also, it turned out, just on the verge of making my first pro sale, but not there yet.*

But, this happened to me once I was established, too. In fact, the WorldCON I felt the worst at was the most recent ChiCON in 2012, when I had, what, fourteen books under my belt? I was on paneling and, therefor, very much part of the "in" crowd. I also got my very first ever invitation to a secret pro party (a party I later referred to as the f*cking boat) which was a cruise on the Chicago canals/out into Lake Michigan hosted by Random House (which was not even my publisher.) I have never felt more uncool, than I did at that WorldCON, despite everything, and it all had to do with the fact that my career was starting to sour. But, regardless, I felt left out and all the things that Correia complains about (except no one shouted at me that I was a liar and a misogynist, perhaps for obvious reasons. Though honestly? I might have believed everyone hated me, my mood was so foul. I felt very picked on during the one panel I was on, because it was about serial fiction and all my series had failed.)

Okay, so you see? We all feel this.

It's especially maddening when you're just starting out, because you finally broke in only to find that there's still barriers to being in the spotlight, and we ALL want to be in the spotlight.

Look, we're all divas. Correia is just saying out loud what lot of us feel: boo hoo, it's NOT all about me! (Pro tip: most of us don't say it out loud, because we realize how whiny and self-centered it makes us look.)

BUT... yes, okay? I actually sympathize a little with this. To say there aren't cool kid cliques is disingenuous too. There just are.

Also, this feeling of being shut out of WorldCON culture something that has happened to people on the left, too. Not that long ago (but apparently outside of the collective memory), there was a huge controversy around the London WorldCON about a cliquish inner circle of white guys (and GRRM is even pictured!)

Here's the thing I want to say about this: con culture is a thing. It's a thing everyone needs to learn how to negotiate.

I've even talked about this idea before on this blog because I came across someone on Twitter complaining about feeling left out/unwelcomed at a con. The thing I said to that person (who was decidedly on the left), is that we're all responsible for our own con experience. It's not the con's job to make you feel welcome. You have to learn the culture of cons and figure out how to fit in. Some conventions even have panels on the opening days ABOUT how to make inroads and make friends and be involved in a way that will let you leave the con feeling like you were part of it in a positive way. I was lucky because we have a lot of local cons to "practice" on, some of them are HUGE, so you can get something very akin to a WorldCON experience. I know for a fact that I bounced in and out of the first con I ever attended, which was a WisCON: 1984, when Elizabeth A. Lynn was one of the Guests of Honor.

I did that con and maybe hit an early MiniCON and thought, "Eh, not much for me here." It wasn't until much later when I was starting a writing career did I go back and really work to make in-roads by volunteering for panelling, etc.

TBF, the local fan scene is such that you did have to kind of know the right people or at least be known to them. I somehow got on Eric Heideman's radar, and that was panelling for me for life.

So, fandom as insider-y? Hella yeah.

Does it mean the Hugos are broken? I don't think so. Yeah, it's possible they've been out of touch, if only because WorldCON members are aging, etc., but as Cheryl Morgan talks about in her take on Puppygate-Winners and Losers, in many ways the Puppies have brought a renewed interest in the Hugos that you couldn't have bought and paid for, if you'd tried.




----

*Out of curiosity, I went to see which WorldCONs I've attended and they are: 1998 BucCONeer (Baltimore), 2000 ChiCON (Chicago), 2004 NoreasCON (Boston), and 2012 ChiCON (Chicago).

April 2025

S M T W T F S
  1 2345
6 7 8 9101112
1314 1516 17 1819
20212223242526
27282930   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 23rd, 2025 05:20 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios