lydamorehouse: (shield)
Do you remember, right after Trump was elected, the article that was first posted on Facebook that everyone seemed to reprint, which was "20 Lessons on How to Survive Fascism"?  It's always worth a reread. I've been thinking about that article a lot, on and off, throughout these four years. Some of the pointers are very "big," like the concept of 'don't obey in advance" and "stand out." But, the one I keep returning to again and again is the idea that small talk is valuable. From the article:

"11. Make eye contact and small talk. This is not just polite. It is a way to stay in touch with your surroundings, break down unnecessary social barriers, and come to understand whom you should and should not trust. If we enter a culture of denunciation, you will want to know the psychological landscape of your daily life."

Along with the concept that we should cultivate friends in other countries, this is a huge reason why I have been continuing to write to my pen friends around the world. 

A lot of what we write to each other would very likely constitute what most people would categorize as 'small talk,' but lately I've been resisting the idea that those kinds of conversations about the weather and gardening and the mundanity of life are, in any way, SMALL.

I think they tend to get minimized because people are impatient. (Also sexism, but I won't get into that right now, but I do think this is very similar to the divide between so called high art and folk art. If it's useful and a woman made it, like a quilt, it's folk art. If a man painted it and it serves no actual purpose beyond beauty, it's high art.)

More and more, particularly with the advent of smartphone where we can have a zillion more interesting conversations in our pocket (and an increasing sense of missing out on something cooler, over there,) people are anxious to get to the "good stuff."  They don't want to take the time to lay the foundational chatter. Like today, at my coffee shop, my barista and I had a completely "small" exchange about my Caribou Perks card because I accidentally presented that to be punched at this locally owned shop. She told me she used to work at Caribou and we exchanged a bunch of completely mundane observations about Caribou--it's quality of coffee, the fact that I had a friend who used to manage one back in the 1990s, the concept of "Boo Bucks" (pre-point system stuff) and then, fascinatingly, because we'd gone down this twisty road, we ended up talking about the culture of harassment that my barista left behind in frustration after sixteen years at Caribou. CREEPY things people said to her, etc. It was a fascinating conversation because the other barista, a guy, had similar stories to share, though less about customers being sexually creepy to him specifically. We spent several more minutes trying to decide if what happened to these two at that specific company was endemic to that company or was if there was something about the commercial coffeeshops that fostered certain kinds of people/harassment.

Fascinating. 

And not at all 'small.'

Yet, we would never have gotten there if I hadn't patiently engaged in a whole lot of small talk previously. To be fair, by "previously," i also mean months and months of chatting amiably with these folks behind the counter, too. 

Some of this, admittedly, is me. I am 100% the sort of person who is genuinely interested in everything about your life. You want to tell me about the day you spent doing laundry; I totally want to hear it, all of it, all the details. Maybe this is part of why I'm a writer. It's certainly a HUGE part of why I'm a reader.

Mason will also tell you that I'm uncannily good at drawing strangers into conversation. He finds it kind of baffling, in the way of teenagers, but he will also tell other people this fact about me with with a odd sort of pride, ala, "You have no idea. I come out from class to go to a doctor's appointment and there's ima, chatting with the security guard, laughing like they're old friends."

That was a fascinating conversation, too, actually, We started by talking about the weather, for real. I made that joke about how the reason we live where the air hurts our faces it because we don't have to deal with giant scorpions and boa constrictors, and that prompted her to tell me about an amazing trip she'd taken with her family (sisters, I think,) to Texas and the weird encounter they'd had with some crows or magpies. She started the story with, "Have you ever seen Alfred Hitchcock's 'The Birds'??" and I knew it was going to be a good story from there.... and all because I spent five minutes LITERALLY discussing the weather.

I doubt any of this this will actually save us from fascism--I mean, it hasn't so far, if today's news is any indication. But, I do think making human connections strengthens one's soul. If nothing else, it keeps me exercising my 'compassion' and 'empathy' muscles, all of which this current administration would really like to gaslight and bludgeon out of us with their constant misinformation and lies. 
lydamorehouse: (writer??)
A colleague of mine, Gardner Dozois, posted a thought-provoking question on his Facebook feed: "If a time-traveling much younger version of yourself came to the door, would he or she be disappointed in the older you they found? Why? Or if they WOULDN'T be disappointed, again, why?"

I said that it would really depend on how much younger this younger version of me was.  My high school self would probably have been pretty surprised to discover that her older self was an out lesbian. Although maybe less so my senior year of high school, when I was rather religiously reading the Gay Comix I'd bought at the downtown head shop.  

Probably more shocking, however, might be to find my older self married and with a kid.

I NEVER imagined myself married.  

But, disappointed? I think not. I think my high school self would have DIED OF JOY to find out that I'd become a published science fiction/fantasy author.  In fact, I said, "I think my younger self would cheer me up."  I don't think my younger self would give any sh*ts that I wasn't currently publishing. I could just see her bouncing around on the porch saying "FOURTEEN?  I PUBLISHED FOURTEEN BOOKS??"  I'd probably invite her in and say, "Yeah, check out this bookshelf.  This is all you. You've been translated into Polish, German, and.... Look!!!  JAPANESE."  My younger self probably would have been like, "Japanese? Whatever.  What the hell is this weird art? Why are her eyes so big? But Polish! Wow! Grandma Morehouse could read this! And Grandpa could read the German ones!"

Then, she'd get to the Tate stuff and be like, "Romance?" and given me the skeptical side-eye, like 'am I really at the right future?' In fact, I'm very sure younger me would pull all the faces about romance.  I would just shake my head and say, "Dude. You have NO IDEA how romantic you are. And thank GOD you're performing heteronormativity now or I'd have no memories to draw on."

Then she would have rolled her eyes and said, "'Heteronormativity'? People in the future talk weird."

I'd be like, "You say 'gnarly' on a regular basis. UNIRONICALLY. Do. Not. Judge. Do you want to hear about how you MET Anne McCaffery or not?"

What about you? What would your past self say to you?

Adulting

Mar. 6th, 2017 09:12 am
lydamorehouse: (Default)
Today, I woke up thinking about "adulting."  

Last Wednesday, I had lunch with a friend of mine.  We met at Eli's East, which I had never been to before.  As usual, I had a great time chatting with this particular friend, who is someone I've recently gotten to know after last year's Gaylaxicon.  At one point during our conversation he said that even after marriage and divorce, the thing that made him feel like a real adult was caring for houseplants.  

At the time, I mostly let this comment go by, unremarked, because I was far more fascinated to know that he'd been married and divorced already. (He's younger than I am by a decade... or possibly two.)

This morning, a half a week later, I woke up thinking about this idea: what are the sorts of actions, events, etc., that make people feel like an adult?  What constitutes "adulting" for most people?

I was thinking about this because I remember the first time I felt really independent, adult.  It was the first time I took my own laundry down to the basement laundry room of my college freshman dorm building. I was seventeen. It was, in point of fact, the first time I'd ever done my own laundry.  Despite a lot of other independent acts in high school, for some reason, doing this job that my mother traditionally ALWAYS did for me, felt like the true moment of independence.  There were things about it that also felt very... Big City. I had to have quarters, figure out the machines on my own (and all the sorting rules!), and some weirdo tried to convert me to Lutheranism--he was very affronted that I had not accepted Jesus Christ as my personal savior.

But, then again, my generation has, I think, less issue with "adulting" as a thing.  We grew up in that mythical era when parents flung open doors to the very young and said, "Come back by dinner time," and we really did roam far from home without any supervision whatsoever.  I regularly had to solve problems like, "Holy heck, how do I get my shoe out of this muck I have wandered into in the local marshlands" without being able to use my nonexistent cellphone to call for help and being miles (often literally) from home.  

And I wonder if it's some of this early practicing with independence that made the transition into "adulting" a little less... noticeable?  Or, maybe more accurately, MORE noticeable on a smaller scale.  I mean, for my friend it was the small thing that made him feel grown, too.  But, it came much later for him than for me.  MUCH.  

I guess my question is, how about you? No matter how old you are, do you have a singular event where you said to yourself, "Wow, this is IT.  THIS is the moment I am independent. THIS is the transition into adulthood!"?? No shame if it's something "traditional," like, "The day I signed the lease to my first apartment" or "got married" or "got my driver's license." Similar, no judgments, if it's something really odd, like, "The day I bought my first pair of underwear" or something I can't even fathom.  

I'm also curious if you find yourself in your late thirties (or forties or fifties or whatever) and you're still not feeling like "adulting" is a thing you do regularly. 
lydamorehouse: (Renji 3/4ths profile)
 I'm about to say something ridiculously stupid. I'll probably get in trouble for it and you can all feel free to tell me how wrong I am (because I do promise to listen).  But, on the other hand, I'm very much NOT one of those writers or bloggers who gets a whole lot of attention anyway.  

There's been a lot of talk in my circles lately about how women of a certain age (and SF women writers of a "certain career length") begin to disappear as they age.  I'm young yet (at least in my opinion), being several years away from fifty (only three...), but I might fall in to the "certain career length" category, since I was first published at the very beginning of this century.  

I'm hearing war stories from my colleagues, women in SF, that are mind-boggling.  The kind that make me feel like what I did in 1999 is neigh-on impossible now--that, publishing SF as a woman with a female protagonist, is harder now than it was back then. When I asked why this is, it was explained to me that I was an acceptable token.  Token women weren't seen as a threat.  Now that nearly 40% of SFWA is female, we're seen as over-running the genre, ruining it, or, as the Lightspeed Magazine campaign snarkily said, "WOMEN DESTROYING SCIENCE FICTION."

I don't doubt this, by the way.  Numerous studies have been shown that some men feel outnumbered by women, when the actual percentage of women in the room is only at a third, or even less.  It's also very, VERY clear from things like Gamergate and countless others, that sexism is alive and well and very much the blunt weapon of choice of a surprising number of people these days.  

That's not really the issue I want to talk about though.  I bring it up, only to make sure that what I'm about to say is not conflated with any sense that I might not believe sexism is a real thing. Or that I think because my experiences with it are very different, that I don't believe it happens all the time to people I know and that it is scary and real.

I think, however, when it comes to aging, one must plan to do it graceLESSly.  

On Facebook, the other day, author Sharon Lee brought up the idea of the disappearing woman of a certain age with an example of something she saw happening in a restaurant.  A woman was ignored by the servers, presumably because she was female and because she was older (also presumably alone or in the company of another woman).  A number of people jumped on to the thread and added at if you'e "of a certain size" it can be even worse.  People actively don't want to see you. You get hostilely ignored. 

Again, I don't doubt this is a real phenomenon.  Not at all.  But, sometimes I think yelling loudly is the solution.

It's probably far too simplistic.  I realize that.  But, I'm planning to go out kicking and screaming.  I've been ignored by servers.  If it's busy I will give people a slight benefit of the doubt and give them a few extra minutes to get to me, but if I'm left hanging too long I start yelling.  I starting saying, "Excuse me, I need service."  If I can't get people's attention that way, I leave.  And I make sure to tell the manager or someone on the way out that I'm leaving because i got ignored.  

I feel like that's my personal solution to a lot of problems.  I have never had a man talk over me, BECAUSE, IF HE TRIES, I JUST SHOUT LOUDER.  Like I said in my post about "fandom being welcoming," I am super-privileged in that I have never, ever doubted my right to an opinion.  If someone tells me to my face that I don't have the right because of some chromosomes I have that they don't, I tell them to shut the f*ck up, because they're obviously a moron.  

I read somewhere too, that part of women disappearing has to do with the male gaze, i.e. that we "disappear" because MEN no longer see us. I know that can't be all there is to it, because I stopped courting the attention of men in my first year of college.  Even then I gave, as the kids would say, very few f*cks about what ANYONE thought of me, male or female.

To be fair, I have somehow, despite this attitude, never been issued a death threat. No one has ever threatened to rape me or harm me because I dared to say my opinion.  

And I know this happens to other women.

And I know that being white helps a lot.  I also know that being a professional "of a certain career length" actually comes with privileges, too.

So maybe it's more that I just WISHED that shouting helped. And maybe I'm just going to keep shouting for all the people who can't.

You may see me on a lot of panels about this in the future, because Eleanor Arnason and I have decided we're not going to go out quietly.  Maybe we will continue to be ignored as we grow older (just as we were when we were young), but at least we will make what noise we can.  I refuse to not contribute to the conversation, even if I wasn't invited.




lydamorehouse: (ichigo being adorbs)
I was scrolling through my Twitter feed, like you do, and I came across this:  "Why 'Fandom is Family' is Problematic".  It's a collection or round-up of tweets (probably involving a much larger discussion) about the phrase 'fandom is family' and why we should stop using it.  First of all, I've actually never heard this phrase in my long association with SF fandom, and I tend to agree that family is not ALL THAT to everyone and it certainly should not be a phrase used to shelter abusers, etc.

What I'm reacting to is the idea that fandom (and it's not clear which 'fandom' is meant here, but maybe SF con fandom?) is unwelcoming because it has so many in-jokes... or...?  I'm not sure, because I think, in point of fact, that the very term "not welcoming" is a dog-whistle for the Tumblr-generation/fans.  

I'm not saying they're not right.  

When I first entered con fandom, I felt very lost.  I didn't know the routine. I didn't know the lingo. I didn't have many friends who went to cons.  In point of fact, I dropped out of con fandom until I was a newly energized/hungry writer and saw the advantages of meeting people by being on panels.  It should be noted, too, that I am, and have always been, a vey out-going and social person.  It's not normally hard for me to make friends with strangers.

So it's absolutely true that a person's first con can feel very... exclusive, excluding even.  Certainly, LONELY.

I experienced that whole feeling of exclusion all over again, despite years of being in sf con fandom, when I entered the anime fandom (and the anime con fandom, both of which have their own sets of rules and entire language books full of code and lingo and acronyms.)  I even posted here that what i needed for the next Anime Detour was a translator to act as my guide.

But...

I never felt it was the duty of the con runners to make me feel "welcomed."  I felt weird about my lack of knowledge--uncomfortable even, but I didn't let that stop me. If I felt any sense of privilege it was a self-empowered one, which was to say I NEVER DOUBTED THAT I HAD THE RIGHT TO PARTICIPATE, I just had to figure out HOW.  I also never doubted that figuring out HOW was on me, and me alone.  So, I thought, "Alright then, I need to ask what does mean?"  I need to call up my friends and say, "Okay, who here is going with me?"  I asked my more anime con savvy friends, "So... when someone is in costume, do I talk to them 'in character' or... What?  How do I interact here?  What are the rules?"  In my early SF con days, I found someone I knew and asked, "Okay, so what DOES it take to get on panels?  How do I volunteer for the stuff I like?"

I'm not saying this because I feel like "kids these days" (or people new to fandom) don't have the same where-with-all that I did/do.  

But, because this term gets bandied about a lot, I do wonder if "not welcoming" actually is for them one of those words they use that means something that my generation doesn't quite understand the same way.  I wonder if it means more than what I'm describing.  I'm wondering if there are very specific ways in which the younger generation feels less empowered to just participate, despite the things I described above.

I'm not sure.

I want someone to tell me.  I want to understand.  I want to hear the stories that will open my eyes, so I can FIX the things for you (and, ultimately for all of us.)

In the meantime, I have to guess from context.

One of the back-and-forths in the twitter round-up made it seem like one person felt left out because Michael Thomas joked about "TRUfandom" (which is also a phrase I didn't know).  She said, basically:  "Whelp, see what I mean, I don't know this stuff."  To me, that's not being shown the door, and having it slammed in your face, that's just BEING NEW.  I've had the same experience as an old-timer, getting onto Tumblr and going to Anime cons.  I never felt unwelcome.  I just felt NEW.  

We all need to learn each other's language.  

I think that this is less 'insider-ism' than just the way sub-cultures operate.  I sometimes have to use the urban dictionary to parse out what my neighbor is saying to me or what comments on my fan fic mean.  I don't think my neighbor or the fans of my writing are trying to insult me or exclude me or intentionally make me feel unwelcome.  In fact, each time I deciphered a bit of the code, I felt brought closer in.  When someone left me ILU on my fan fic, I'd no idea for sure what that meant.  I looked it up, and it means "I love you!" or "I like you" and is kind of just a term of excitement, bonding, or, as my subculture would call it, squee.

I really think that when Michael made his comment his intention was inclusion, as in, 'like that joke we have about TRU fandom, you and me."  Yet it was seen as endemic to the problem.

I think we need to stop assuming hostility from each other.

Fandom needs all of us, young and old.

Srsly.
lydamorehouse: (Default)
Okay, after getting some wonderful suggestions for improvement, here's what I came up with for a second draft of my review of the art book that caused me to FREAK OUT about my art skills.

----
Every time I pick up a book about drawing, I end up learning more about myself than I do art.

I ordered Foundations in Comic Book Art: Fundamental Tools and Techniques for Sequential Artists by John Paul Lowe from Blogging for Books this month because I’m a frustrated artist.

As the title suggests, this is a book aimed at teaching fundamentals to beginners. It is a book chock full of exercises aimed at improving basic skills, from learning to draw straight lines to understanding the specialized needs of visual storytelling. The example art throughout is magnificent, and for every lesson there’s a written and visual example. The tone of the book is fairly serious. It is aimed squarely at someone like myself, who is desperately looking a way to ‘level up,’ and gain the extra skill sets needed to become a comic book artist/graphic novelist.

Lowe’s book should have been perfect for me, but after reading through it several times and trying some of the examples, I ended up instead with a visceral emotional response which can be summed up in two words: I suck.

The forward and introduction to Lowe’s book suggest this is the very last feeling that I should’ve come away with. Lowe is very much of the belief (as am I) that art, like any skill, can be learned by anyone regardless of innate talent given enough time and energy.

I’m not sure what it is about this book that left me with that feeling. As I’ve said, this is a textbook aimed at teaching basics. Yet I left it feeling like there was no way I could ever master any of it (despite being far from a novice artist,) and it was all too overwhelming.

I wonder if it wasn’t because all the art shown was so good? This is one of those art textbooks where I’m already green with envy just looking at the instruction images that are supposed to be teaching me to see basic shapes in every day items, and instead of seeing the circles and squares, I’m thinking: damn, look at that cool apple! How come I can’t draw an apple like that??

There are a few playful images in the textbook, but even those examples showcase tremendous skill in background drawing. There were no examples that made me feel: oh, hey, I can do that.

There were no suggestions for work-arounds. Like, for instance, in my own comic book art, I have been known to cheat. I’ll take original photographs and use them as background images:

 

 The other thing that was missing from this book that’s been tremendously helpful for me, as someone who has considered coming into graphic novel writing from the other side is, a script. There’s a very specific kind of writing format that comic book WRITERS use that I’ve been privileged to see thanks to a friend of mine who works for Marvel and DC. What looking at those taught me was how important it is for the writer of comic books (if they’re not the artist) to think visually as well and consider how much text/dialogue can reasonably fit in a panel.

So, while I think this is probably an awesome textbook to go with a class, I’m not entirely sure how well it works for me. There are two huge chapters at the end of this book that are specific to digital programs that I’m not using. I would have preferred that space be used to talk more about the business of comic book writing.

Your mileage may vary.

As I said, my strong emotional reaction to what is essentially a textbook surprised me.

lydamorehouse: (more renji art)
After my post about the horribleness of fruitcake, my friend [livejournal.com profile] empty_mirrors decided to send me DECENT fruitcake from the UK, where she's from.  The packages arrived earlier this week and included some other UK delicacies that we can't get 'round here, including Jelly Babies and Treacle (because Mason always hears about treacle in the Harry Potter books and had to know!)  We haven't had a tasting yet, because Shawn came down with a horrible case of the laryngitis crud that we've been passing around the household, and we wanted to wait and have a special UK day/tea where we tried ALL THE THINGS and it seems unfair with her snorfling and unable to taste much beyond her own mucous....

With any luck, that will be this weekend.  I plan to take may pictures and post all our reactions.

But, poor Shawn, this cold/laryngitis thing has been growing stronger with each person it attacks (like a shounen hero!), so she's been really knocked back, far worse than either Mason or I.  I'm still suffering a tiny bit--my sinuses are still runny and my throat hurts, but I'm otherwise mostly over it.

The issue of British food (and fruitcake) came up last Friday when I dined with the Wolves (the good folks at Sofa Wolf had me over when my friend and fellow writer Kyle Gold was in town.)  Turns out, the Wolves make their own figgy pudding, which is another one of those things that you always hear about, but... at least in my case, have never had.  So I slyly invited myself to some holiday gathering so I could taste it.  I mean, it sounds like some kind of sweet version of haggis!  You make it one year and let it... ferment?... age?... in a cold, dark place for OVER A YEAR????  Seriously, I can't wait.

I had a lovely time, as usual, with the Wolves.  Afterwards, Kyle and I have been emailing back and forth percolating on an idea for a furry-type novel for me.  Could be fun, is all I'm saying, and at this point, I have so very little to lose.

In fact, later this afternoon, I have scheduled a phone call with my agent that I'm kind of dreading.  It's one of those that could go either way.  Keep your fingers crossed for me.

Also, since I was sick, I've been neglecting my around the house duties.  Today I tackled a pile of dishes.  One of the things I like to do while doing the dishes is watch Anime on my iPad.  It sits nicely in the windowsill above the sink, so I can do my work and still read subtitles.  I've gotten through Full Metal Alchemist, Free!, Attack on Titan, and Samurai Champloo that way.  I've just started Death Note.  Death Note is different from a lot of other shounen Anime in that our hero is... kind of a villain.  No, not kind of... totally.  The basic premise is that a death god, a shinigami, has dropped his notebook , into which the names of the dead are written, into the Human World.  A bright high school boy named Light find it and discovers that he can kill people by writing their names, times of death, and cause into it.  His plan, of course, is to use it for GOOD.  He starts by picking off condemned criminals.  But, what's interesting about the story is that the slippery slope is VERY slippery and pretty soon we discover when the shinigami comes to track Light down, that our "hero" plans to create a new world and SET HIMSELF UP AS GOD.

I spend a lot of this show not sure who to root for.  It's like "Dexter," without the funny/interesting insights into human nature from the point of view of a sociopath. The only thing that's compelling about Light is how smart he is.  But he's DEVIOUS-smart, which is compelling, but also kind of... scary, especially now that Light is trying to save himself from discovery.  I like the show a lot, but it makes me remember why I'm not terribly fond of vigilante heroes, like Batman.

I know everyone loves Batman, but Batman has never been a favorite of mine (nor his Marvel analog Iron Man), because essentially Bruce Wayne (and Tony Stark) is a rich vigilante.  Both heroes use money to give them powers that allow them to operate beyond the law.  Both heroes believe they're serving justice.  In the Marvel and DC universes, it's very rare that either of them make a mistake and it's clear that we're meant to believe they're right, they *are* doing the right thing for the right reasons and filling a real need.  What's funny to me is that I'm a huge fan of two other rich vigilantes: the Scarlet Pimpernel and Zorro, but in both those cases, the universe in which the heroes live is very clearly screwed-up and both heroes fight to protect those being harassed by corrupt governments.  You could make a case that Gotham is a corrupt government, but it's not usually portrayed that way OVERTLY.  Again, over in the Marvel Universe, the same could be said for New York (or LA, depending on if Tony is in the East Coast or West Coast Avengers at the time), but, you know, again not strictly obvious or overt....

I don't really know where I was going with this thought except to say that I guess shows like "Death Note" feel more honest to me, like a REAL exploration of what might happen if you have an intense sense of justice combined with the knowledge that sometimes the system fails to catch the bad guys/punish them properly.  And maybe some Batman story lines *have* dealt with this, I don't know.

I probably just don't like Batman because he has a butler.  Who has a butler in this day and age? (And yes, I KNOW some people still do, but do we LIKE them??)
lydamorehouse: (more renji art)
Thanks to [livejournal.com profile] revolutionaryjo, last night I finished #24 of Attack on Titan/Shingaki no Kyojin. When I mentioned in passing that I was watching this finally, a reader of my Bleach fanfic said that s/he couldn't decide whether or not to look forward to or dread the day I started writing SnK fanfic.

I'm never going to write in this universe.

Though it has a military structure that totally appeals to me (because unlike Bleach, the various units actually function a lot more like real military divisions,) the universe the characters exist in is unrelentingly grim. The situation itself is no more horrible than a lot of shonen stories. The future is a place where humanity has been forced to retreat behind walls because kaiju giant human-shaped creatures (Titans) roam around looking for tasty people to eat. A hero emerges.... you know how this part goes, I'm sure. Eren has a determination no one else has, along with a nifty superpower that makes him the hope for humanity.

There's even a lot of intriguing politics. There are spies and traitors in our ranks. It's unclear whether or not the whole thing is a farce, ie a giant set-up by the powers that be to keep humanity cowering and afraid and completely malleable and heavily taxed.

Normally, this would be a winning combination for me. But, the author is really extremely 'realistic' in his approach to war and casualties... heavy on the casual part of that, which is to say, like in a real war, people die stupid, meaningless deaths, sometimes very much random and unfair. Very, very few people get to be heroes. Even the hero of the story, Eren, doesn't always get to be heroic. Sometimes his superpower goes out of control, and sometimes he can't call it up, and sometimes he's ASKED to waste human lives for a greater goal (which also sometimes doesn't work out, even if the effort is valiant.)

That last bit is the part that has caused an utter lack of "FEELS." I care about what happens in this story, but the situation has forced me to divest in everyone. I have one character I like, but the words "DOOMED" seem so clearly printed on his face, that I refuse to imagine anything beyond THIS MOMENT.

SnK should also be a prime candidate for fic from me, because they skip over a lot of the more interesting times--boot camp is given two or three episodes before we get a timeskip and then training with the advance scout troop also gets only a few episodes. This is where the FEELS fail. Possibly more attention is given these times in the manga, because the speed at which we head into action means that I miss out on the little moments that could make these characters stand out. It shrinks the world rather than expand it for me. If we had several episodes of life at boot camp, I might give a few more 3-D maneuvering f*cks.

Yet I'm expected to keep track of all these white people. The other problem about SnK is that no one really stands out physically. Several people (being military and all) have the same hair color and hair style and there's not a single person of color. Which, I presume can be blamed on the fact that this takes place in some kind of pseudo-Germany/Europe, but last time I checked the Moors had made an in-road into Europe SOME TIME AGO. It's kind of creepy, in fact, that it is CANON that Mikasa is Asian and THUS IS CONSIDERED VERY RARE. I have no idea if that's meant to strike the kind of fear it does into my heart, but, if we have more Gunthers and Heinricks I'm going to start thinking that they're intentionally echoing Nazis.

The uniform certainly does.

So, perhaps if I read the manga I'll start sympathizing with the mindless Titans?

It will be interesting to see why Annie is one of them. Her motivations are currently unclear and it's fascinating to me that the times that she powers-up/rips free/calls others to eat her while in her Titan form is whenever someone threatens to cut off her limbs. Had she been experimented on? Is Eren's creepy-ass scientist dad somehow to blame with his Silence of the Lambs basement? My theory about why all the Titans are attracted to Eren and why they're always trying to capture him? Dad is the villain. He's created all the variants, including all the ones who are ultra-intelligent and he's done it at the behest of the government.

But, even with all this, I have very little interest in investing in this fandom beyond being a reader/watcher. if I had any FEELS it would have been focused on Jean/Marco AND ONE OF THEM IS ALREADY DEAD. It's kind of hard to write a sweeping romance with a F*CKING GHOST (although SnK fan writers/artist are sure doing their damnedest.)

So, yeah. NO. Just NO.

July 2025

S M T W T F S
  1 2345
67 8 9101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 13th, 2025 11:11 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios