I have to admit I'm not very happy with either attempt. As you'll see below, I had to try this twice. Part of my trouble getting this card to behave may have a lot to do with the fact that I'm actually pretty terrible at drawing background stuff (the opposite of Hitler, I guess. People I can do; buidlings, not so much!)
Here's attempt one:

I have, once again, written a nice, long description of my thinking over at Tate's blog (along with somewhat larger images). You can read all my thoughts about this
over here. When I showed these to Shawn a couple of nights ago, she asked me why I decided to show the Arcane tools in their traditional form of the cup, wand, sword and pentacle. My thinking is this -- even though I'm not always fond of this particular meaning for the Magician card, it is possible to read the Magician as dependent, still, on his tools (that is if if you go with the Fool's Journey idea, with the Magician as the first stop -- as opposed to the Kabblastic idea of the Fool as the pinnicle, end spot of the spiritual journey.) For Mr. Fantastic, then, the arcane tools are the ones whose code he hasn't yet cracked. These are the tools that require further study, deeper probing, as it were.
Here's my second attempt:

I'm a bit happier with this one, even though I changed very little. Reed is now in a lab coat, which I think suits this card better (as he's not a hero here, only an adept in his sanctum sanctorium). Both the infinity symbol and the gizmo that defies gravity (over his right, upraised hand) are obscured by the machinery already brought into existance by the magician, whose understanding of physics, etc. is like that Clarke line, "indistinguishable from magic." The Negative Zone is now shown open, so that when reversed, the querent is faced with the possiblity of falling into it, as it were.
Any opinons? Comments?