lydamorehouse: (Default)
I saw a skeet on Bluesky a couple of days ago that hit me hard. It was from a trans person who was decrying the lack of energy and outcry around Congresswoman Nancy Mace's proposed bathroom ban in DC and the Capitol building. This person was like, "Where is everyone? Where is the groundswell? Last time we were so loud! Now, it's crickets!"

I am ashamed to admit this, but my first thought was, "OMG, it's because I am already so tired."

But, thankfully, my second thought was, "No, that's exactly what they're hoping for. That we're too tired to do it all again, to commit to calling or writing our Congress members as early and as often as it takes." So, I sat my a$$ down in my chair today and I wrote to all three of my congress critters. It was going fine?

... and then I hit Tina Smith's form.

As many of you may remember from the last go-round, a lot of Congress folks have these little electonic forms that you fill out. Often one of the required feilds is "subject matter" and you are only allowed to choose from a drop-down list of things like, agriculture, economy, foreign affairs, etc. Okay, so my House Rep, Betty McCullom had the option "LGBTQIA+" and since I was premptively writing to remind her that trans people are people who need to pee and so I expect her to vote down bullying bullsh*t that makes life extra difficult for my fellow human beings, I clicked that. My Senator Amy Klobuchar did not have a LGBTQIA+ option, but did have Civil Rights, so, since trans rights are civil rights, I clicked that.

Tina Smith had neither.

I chose "General" since that was my only option, wrote my piece, and ended with a sternly worded P.S. in which I noted that I found it deeply uncomfortable that there wasn't even a "Civil Rights" option.

I went back to doing the dishes.... and proceeded to slowly lose my mind.

By now, no doubt, most of you have seen this insanely powerful show of force by a minority voice in the New Zealand house of parliment.  (If you haven't, watch this. Even if you have, feel free to watch it again. I have it on loop when I need to be reminded that a FEW can be very, very powerful voices.)




And I kept turning around in my head that Tina Smith was so cowardly that she couldn't even put CIVIL RIGHTS as an option for things that she was willing to talk to her constituents about.  I couldn't let it go. I put down the dish I was washing, wiped my hands, and returned to the keyboard.

Clicking "General" again, I basically entitled my follow-up "And Another Thing" becuase.... Do you remember when all the pudents told us that one of the reasons that our legistalors have been moving to the center/right is because they used to get harrassed so constantly by the conservative wack-jobs in their districts that they started to feel like those loudest voices were the will of the people? I have decided that I'm going to be a liberal whack-job that this darkest timeline needs.

So I told her what I believe. 

Personally,--and I am aware that this is nothing but a gut feeling, I have no polls to back this up--I believe that the Left didn't turn out to vote because of people like her: cowards. From the top down, Democrats have been yellow-bellied cowards for some time now. Just one haka would have gone a long way. But, instead, what we get is senators like her who are too afraid of the right, too cowed by Nazis, too determined to work across that aisle, that they won't even put CIVIL RIGHTS down as an option of things to talk about.

If I get put on some nut job ban list by her office, I don't care. Civil rights seems like the sort of thing that a person REPRESENTING ME ought to have the balls to DISCUSS.  I mean, I'm not even asking her to stand up for them, since, clearly, she's afraid to even utter LGBTQIA+ on a list--much less Civil F*cking Rights. 

I didn't swear in my letter, though. Nothing useful comes of that. Honestly, nothing useful comes of writing our Congress critters either, but this is one of those things I've determined, for myself, is a "yes, and."  It takes so little effort on my part to send an email. It is something I can continue to do so that, if nothing else, historians will know that there were a few of us who didn't just surrender like mindless sheep to the fascists. 
lydamorehouse: (cap)
Last night I finished the last of the SECRET INVASION titles, and, looking around for a bit of light bathroom reading, I picked up one of the CIVIL WAR titles (I think it was Chronicles #1)... and suddenly, I missed the whole civil war storyline something fierce.

My reading of CIVIL WAR has been necessarly spotty. I came back into comics when CIVIL WAR was mostly wrapping up, so I couldn't read it episodically and the collections are actually somewhat difficult to navigate as an outsider, especially given how many titles the storyline straddles.

So, really, I'd never read many of the sort of major events or first moments, and only knew about them from context and what I'd gleaned from later issues. The issues I read last night collected some iconic scenes -- the whole Stampford School Incident and the moment Captain America goes rogue. The most powerful image, however, was the end piece with Spider-Man juxaposed with a story about family forced into the Japanese rellocation camps of WWII. The very last panel shows the family heading into the concentration camp on one side, the Statue of Liberty in the middle, and Spider-Man gazing at the statue saying, "With great power..."

Oh. My. God.

Where's the awesome now?

I think a lot of my disappointment of SECRET INVASION is that there's nothing, for me at least, in the new storyline that can compare to moments like that. For one, the Skrull's aren't an enemy I can understand. The powerful thing about the CIVIL WAR was that the "enemy" became us. "Who's side are you on?" was the tagline, and it pretty much summed up what was exciting for me about the CIVIL WAR. As a reader, I was engaged in the story in a much more personal way. Was Captain America's illegal resistance justified? Should a soldier follow the law, when the law is unjust? Is freedom more important than security? Or are there times when security should trump individual freedoms? What I loved about CIVIL WAR is that the answers were NEVER portrayed as simple. I think that it was pretty clear that many of the authors shared my personal politics, but that didn't stop them from making very logical and sensible arguments for "the other side."

Spider-Man never finishes his sentence. We know that his tagline is, "With great power comes great responsiblity," but we're left with our own minds blown open to what he seems to be suggesting which may (or may not) be:

...and what IS your responsiblity in the face of facism?? Facism from your own country in the name of security?? Do you do nothing and face the consequences that you may be allowing evil, or do you stand up for what's right even when popular sentiment is against you?

The Skrull invasion, for me at least, doesn't ask anything quite so difficult for me. Yeah, maybe the non-Skrull/real Captain America stepped off the "captured" Skrull ship, but... who cares? The person who won my heart -- the REAL Captain America (Skrull or not) -- stood up against facism and for civil liberties during the superhero civil war. The rest just doesn't matter.

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    1 23
4 56 78910
111213 14151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 19th, 2025 08:16 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios