lydamorehouse: (more renji art)
So, that means that I've posted Tate's latest installment. It's sexy times again... because Alex and Valentine have rushed back to Robert's house to try to play at a little B&D. And... let's just say Alex is not very EXPERT at the whole dom thing....

http://www.wattpad.com/49931265-unjust-cause-part-8-of-tops-and-bottoms

Because you know what? It's not all 69 Shades of Awesome. I don't know about you, but I'm lucky to be able to THINK during sex, much less plan out how to get someone tied to the bed. And, part of the fun of this particular experiment in self-publishing is that I get to write sex the way I want. I'm personally very fond of silly, vaguely-awkward, (more like my real life experiences) sex. I mean, I still hope, one day, to write the super-hot, yet not, scene in which the cat interrupts the sexy times, because YOU KNOW you've had that happen, and far too often we don't celebrate that stuff for the wonderfulness that it truly is.

Plus, I queered things up some. Not just by queering the dom/sub status of the traditional male/female (which I ultimately don't do in this one, but which I plan to by the end of this story), but also when Valentine is talking about this former lover, who is a phoenix. This person is reborn presenting as different gender with each fiery rebirth, but Valentine is VERY ADAMANT that Jin never CHANGES gender, just presents differently.

This is very important to me.

I suspect, if I were still being traditionally published, this would be one of those things I would have fought with my publisher about, and more likely than not, eventually capitulated on. To this day, I'm bummed that I gave up the fight for Matyas' queerness in the Garnet Lacey series. In the book in which Garnet gains the power to see people's inner gods and goddesses, I'd wanted Matyas to have a goddess inside. It wasn't going to change anything about him, not one thing, but I got a very firm 'NO. IT IS NOT DONE.' Boys had to have gods, and girls had to have goddesses, full stop. I THINK I managed to have a waiter in Paris who had a goddess, but that was okay because he was just a throw away character. Because GOD FORBID someone people liked be just-so-very-slightly-hinted at having queerness of any kind!! Dude was sleeping with a girl at the time, even. Though one, I might add, who wore sensible shoes and had a dog, but we won't talk about how CLEARLY I WAS SIGNALING HER QUEERNESS. (This was Izzy. In my head she was a butch bi-woman.)

Not that I have FEELINGS for REASONS.

Sometimes it's so very hard to remember that it was science fiction that taught me the radical notion that you can't judge who you'll love by your lover. A story written by Theodore Sturgeon in 1953 called 'A World Well Lost' was my very first exposure to a sympathetic queer character. I found much more relatable men and women in Elizabeth A. Lynn's books, and, a lifesaver, given that I grew up int the 1970s in a smallish town (though to be fair to LaCrosse, there was at least one gay bar, and my father had an out lesbian colleague at his Catholic college.)

And I did write queerness into my science fiction, rather blatantly. It was just less okay in romance. I will say, this is why I tended to capitulate on fights about this stuff. I mean, I always felt I was trespassing into a foreign land, anyway. (As some of you know, I was lucky to remember to include certain bits of male anatomy.)

Anyway, it's nice to be able to stretch a bit in this. Of course, now we have to see how it goes over with "my public."
lydamorehouse: (Default)
In Stephen King's ON WRITING, he has this great little bit about how writing is awesome because it's like time-traveling telepathy. I read his example, and I thought, yeah. He's nailed it, that's pretty much how it is. I'm thinking it now; you're reading it later. Cool.

Except, when I get my revisions from my editor, it hits me. You can only read my mind if I actually tell you what I'm thinking. And, depending on who you are, I might even have to spell out things that I don't bother thinking because they seem so patently OBVIOUS to me.

Telepathy: Fail.

I think, too, this is why a lot of authors think their editors are morons. We utterly fail to spell out critical details (which seem so CLEAR in our own minds,) and they write to say they didn't see it coming. And, my first response is: "What, are you some kind of idiot!? I clearly... oh, wait. I didn't actually SAY that anywhere in the text. I just knew it to be true, so I thought you would too. Um."

But, on the flipside (and to be fair to both sides of telepathy: fail), it can be irritating when you, the writer, feel like all the subtlety is being lost because you're writing in 2 x 4s for every ah-ha character moment, etc. because the editor doesn't share your brain cells. Especially when your writers' group had no problem with said issue(s), which only exaserbates the sensation that your editor is a complete dolt.

Alas, my editor is not a dolt, or a moron, or an idiot. I only feel like she is because, in reality, I'm the moron, and she only managed to quite astutely noticed all the missing bits in my thought process.

*sigh*

On Saturday, I went to an event organized by [livejournal.com profile] haddayr and a friend of hers on Facebook, which was an awesome antidote to all the stupidity about 9/11. Instead of burning books, we gathered to _read_ them. When I left there weren't many of us, but I don't think that's what mattered. It was cool to sit in Minihaha park and read aloud the words of the Holy Qur'an (in translation.) Which, is quite literally, poetry (even in English.) I read my favorite bit, which is the story of Iblis/Satan which, among other things, illustrates Allah's awesome mercy. In the Christianity that I was exposed to, there's very little sense that God and Satan are anything other than enemies, forever. (Unless, of course, you actually read Job, in which it's quite clear that Satan goes to heaven on a regular basis to chat with G-d.)

In the story in the Holy Qur'an, Allah makes Adam from clay and asks all the angels to bow down before his new creation. Iblis, thinking this is a test of his loyalty, refuses, saying, basically, I will bow only to you, Allah. (Though in the passage I read on Saturday, it's about pride. He says that fire, which he's made of, is superior to mud.) At any rate, Allah tells him he screwed up and banishes him. This, understandably fuels Iblis' hatred for humanity. But, IMHO, the EVEN COOLER part is that Iblis asks to be forgiven on the last day. Allah _agrees_.

That's right. Even Satan/Iblis is forgiven by Allah, the All Merciful.

How cool is THAT??

I think it's incredible, and it's sickening that anyone would take a book with this wonderful story in it and destroy or deface it in any way. Which is why I've decided that whenever I refer to this book, I will use the honorific "Holy." I will also promise to make a similar nod of respect to the other religions of the book and refer to the bible as the Holy Bible, etc. Although do you call the Torah holy? Well, I will for now, until someone corrects me.

Even though these are not my religions by far, I think that I'd rather err on the side of respect. It's that whole crazy idea I heard someone say somewhere before... Do unto others as you would have them do unto you. Or as our Muslim friends say it, "That which you want for yourself, seek for mankind."

May 2026

S M T W T F S
     12
345 6789
10 11121314 1516
1718 1920212223
24252627282930
31      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 20th, 2026 11:01 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios