Home Again

Jun. 16th, 2024 11:08 am
lydamorehouse: (Default)
I always feel like a complete alien at Christian funerals.

For those of you who are not intimately familiar with my life so far, I was raised a secular humanist Unitarian Universalist. I add that first part, because many UUs are, in fact, Christian. We were not. I did, however, spend three years in a Catholic grade school (4th, 5th and 6th grade) and my extended family are all Roman Catholic. So, I guess I'm not a full alien to it all, but sort of like.an odd cousin out.  (Do not, however, feel the need to explain Christianity to me. For one, I am an American, I'm soaking in it, but also please keep in mind that I wrote five books that center around religion and I did my reading!)

Upon arrival at the church, both Mason and I noticed, at least, coming in that there was a "All Are Welcome" pride sticker on the door. The pastor was a young-ish woman and did not choke or blink when I was introduced as Shawn's wife. So, that was something, though I was interrogated after the service by some blue-haired ladies, but I will get to that in a moment. 

The church itself had an airy feel, in part because they did something very unique with the stained glass:


Not the usual full panes of stained glass, instead art pieces hung in front of a circular bay of windows.
Image: Not the usual full panes of stained glass, instead art pieces hung in front of a circular bay of windows. 

Because I was not following along on all the Jesus stuff (and because I am objectively a terrible person) during the service, my mind wandered. My attention kept being drawn to the window at the far left. 


vulva window

Trying NOT to see what I thought I saw:

Tell me what you see, Dr. Freud.
Image: Tell me what you see, Dr. Freud.

If this were a Catholic church (which it was not, Margaret and her family are Lutherans), I would know exactly what this window was meant to symbolize: the Annunciation. There's the Holy Spirit in the form of a dove... uh, let's say "pollinating" in deference to any of you who might find ruder language to be blasphemous, the vulva-shaped womb of Mary.... and there are the those blue lilies at the bottom, clearly showing off their, er, stamen and lilies are generally a metaphorical stand in for, uh, again let's go with--Gabriel's "message" from God.

Not that the image is nearly as subtle as I'm trying to be. That central image in the red interior is taking away a lot of the metaphor for me, personally. Like, I don't know what possessed the artist to go with that, but I don't know how you see that as anything other than what it looks like to my dirty mind.  Let's just say, mushrooms are not typical images associated with Christ.

Also, because of who I am, I went up to the pastor afterwards when it was clear she had finished making her rounds with the mourners and just asked. I said, "I'm not Christian, pastor, can you explain the iconography here?" She stammered and handed me a pamphlet. The pamphlet was, much like most sex ed materials, decidedly unhelpful and instead of explaining anything I was actually looking at, it talked about "the waters of creation" and salvation in Jesus Christ, Our Lord. So, my guess is that I'm kind of right? Like, I see lilies, but I could go with water breaking from the womb the gushing waters of capital c, Creation. 

Besides my dirty obsession with this stained glass, there were a couple of other unusual parts of the service. This may be the first funeral EVER where the Revelation of John was read as one of the readings. For reasons that the pastor later explained, but which still felt like a stretch to me, we got Revelation 22:2

Which, in the King James version, reads thusly:

 In the midst of the street of it, and on either side of the river, was there the tree of life, which bare twelve manner of fruits, and yielded her fruit every month: and the leaves of the tree were for the healing of the nations.

Which is generally strange out of context, but which refers to the "new" Jerusalem which will arise in the thousand year reign of Jesus returned, in which all the streets are orderly and golden, etc. etc. So, at least, this is during the "nice" part of the End Times, I guess. The pastor, in her sermon, explained she chose this section because it referenced a sense of everything being in its place, prepared ahead of time, which was the sort of particular, tidy mouse that Margaret was. The sermon was actually very nice in terms "getting" who Margaret was at her core and letting people acknowledge that sometimes we didn't always want all the extra fuss she made for us. But, Revelation was a new one for me, generally. I might have actually gasped when they noted what they'd be reading.

It did make me think that--not that this would ever happen--but whether or not I could get someone to read the entire Revelation of John at my funeral. I just feel like someone should be ranting about the whore of Babylon and the four horsemen in a corner, while people are trying to remember me. And, of course, I did have to wonder what Margaret would think of it. She was enough of a church-goer I'm pretty sure she'd have been scandalized to have an apocalyptic text read. 

But, you know, churches are just sort of baffling to me. For instance, I was greeted by this sign in the women's bathroom.

Sign that reads: "Wash your hands and say your prayers because Jesus & Germs are everywhere."
Image: Sign that reads: "Wash your hands and say your prayers because Jesus & Germs are everywhere."

I posted this on Facebook because I thought it was funny, but I forgot that I would probably look like a sociopath for mentioning that it was spotted at my mother-in-law's funeral. Please don't think that? I'm just looking back at this with a more distant perspective. 

But, one last Jesus thing, if I may. There was, of course, communion at this service. Normally, I just opt out completely, but Mason and I exchanged a look when the pastor invited those who did not want to partake in communion to come up to the altar for a blessing. That seemed like the polite thing to do? But, we failed it. At this church, which has a cool roundness to that that does, in fact, do a lovely job of invoking a sense of being invited to God's table, the people receiving (the I guess NOT transubstantiated since these are Lutherans) Body of Christ, of which there was a gluten free option! were supposed to kneel before the pastor (and, apparently, also God??) Had I known that was part of the ritual, I would not have opted for the blessing, because I probably should have knelt, but didn't, so then Mason didn't either... and so there we are, standing literally in front of the rest of the congregation, as we were part of the first few to go up being seated just behind the family, clearly REFUSING JESUS. 

Like, had I to do it again, I would have just stayed in my seat and encouraged Mason to do the same. 

Or just knelt. 

Not sure what possessed me not to. Probably Satan!

But, so... immediately after the service was over and we were all headed for the post-service church basement luncheon, at least one blue-haired lady accosted me and demanded to know "Who exactly" I was to Margaret. So, I got to look at her and explain, "I am Margaret daughter-in-law's wife." That seemed to be an okay answer because I was no longer pressed to EXPLAIN MYSELF, though at least one other woman came up to our table at the luncheon to ask if I'd gone to high school in Valparaiso because I looked "so familiar." I demurred and explained that I have that kind of face and, sorry, but I have only ever come to Indiana to visit Margaret.

After she left, I explained to the table (which was just my immediate family and one of Margaret's daughter's cousins,) that I was pretty sure it was the haircut. I look like every butch lesbian that anyone has ever met.

The church luncheon was actually surprisingly yummy. They had really good fried chicken as the main. The rest was kind of meh, in the way of pot luck sides, but they had excellent cheesy potatoes, too. I actually had a very good meal at the luncheon, though I managed to immediately spill some greasy chicken on my silk shirt. As my friend Walter says, "If it's good enough to eat, it's good enough to wear." 

We had been sort of dreading hanging out after the service, but it turned out to be a perfect evening for sitting outside and catching up. Shawn's step-sister's cousin (I guess that makes her Margaret's niece?) was funny and sharp and really good company (we had adopted her to sit with us at the luncheon) and it turns out the one of Shawn's step-sister's kid's wife was a DELIGHT--she works with placing refugees and reuniting families that have been separated, but is also just generally a really interesting person. So, we did the business of reconnecting with family and the living, which is, in so many ways, the purpose of these sorts of things. There was closure for us, too, since one of the things everyone did was order a Margaret Rounds memorial pizza, which is what she used to always have for us whenever we arrived in Valparaiso for a visit. 

She will be missed. 
lydamorehouse: (Default)
 I should preface this question I have for my Christian friends by explaining, for those who don't know me, that I grew-up non-Christian, but Roman Catholic adjacent.  

Both of my parents came from Catholic families, but left the church before I was born. I was raised in a secular humanist Unitarian Universalist fellowship, which was its own weirdness, but is only tangentially related to my question. The thing to know is that my extended family remained Roman Catholic. I also spent 4, 5, and 6th grades in Catholic school. Then, I got my undergraduate degree at a Lutheran college (now university,) where I was required to have several religion credits, including one Bible Study course (which I passed, with a B.) 

So, it's not that I'm, like, "Christianity? What even is?"

Also, if you ONLY know me through DW and my previous stint at LJ, the other thing to know is that I wrote a five book trilogy about angels and demons of all sorts (by which I mean, I wrote not only about Christian angels, but also Muslim and Jewish ones.) I did a f*ck ton of research in these areas because 1) it fascinates me, and 2) I have literally no dog in the fight--I'm now a pagan, but I still very much hold to the UU tenant of "universal salvation," which at it's core means that there is truth of some kind in all religious doctrines and all y'all are already "saved" no need for any intermediary, like a personal relationship with a particular "correct" deity.

And that's the thing that I suspect is critical to my question. I have no personal, emotional attachment to any elements of Christianity. 

With that set-up, now on to the actual question I have for you, my Christian friends on Dreamwidth (or anyone who wants to weigh in, honestly)....

So, there I was last night, sitting at a new friend's house watching Good Omens with the hostess and another friend of hers. We've been watching two episodes at a time and I'm not very regular, so I think last night was episodes 3 and 4. Three, I think, starts with a super-long montage of Crowley and Aziraphale meeting-up at various historical/Biblical moments throughout time. 

When we hit the crucification, my friends almost audibly gasp and say: "I can't believe they went there."

Okay. I get that this is "the" moment of Christianity (though one could argue that the resurrection is a bit more critical.)

BUT.

These two people are long time nerds. I have no idea how they responded to THE MUSICAL NUMBER in "Life of Brian," but I suspect, like nearly every nerd I have ever known, these two could probably sing the words to "Always Look on the Bright Side of Life!" and would do so, with relish.

The crucification, so far, as this non-Christian can tell, is live-action depicted all over the place, including in another musical "Jesus Christ, Superstar." 

Pardon the pun, but I did not think that the crucification was all that sacrosanct. 

During the break, I asked my friends what the big a$$ deal was, but I think they were much more surprised to discover I wasn't Christian and so we kind of talked around it or, if they gave me an answer, it was vague and unsatisfactory. Something like, "You just don't," which seems patently UNTRUE.

I have been thinking about this A LOT and my only current conclusion is that the objection wasn't to the crucification itself, but to its inclusion in a montage clearly designed to show the viewer that these two angels are very, very much in LOVE. I will take no argument on this point. The screenplay adaptor/co-writer (Neil Himself) seems to agree with me and I don't need his twitter confirmation, since someone, presumably Mr. Gaiman, wrote in a gay man on the street comforting Aziraphile when Crowley storms off after asking him to run away with him and says, LITERALLY, "Oh, honey, I've been there. You're better off without him." And Aziraphile nods sadly instead of, you know, no homo-ing the fuck out of that and saying (like he often does when other angels confront him about this forbidden relationship) "We're not friends!" (I should have counted how many times Aziraphile says that in the episode. I would guess three, as it seems a very clear nod to Peter's denial of Christ. They are friends, after all, very much more than, though clearly never consummated.)

So, is it that the presence of gay angels sully the crucification?

Or is there something, my Christian friends, that I am MISSING about the way that scene was portrayed in Good Omens (as opposed to, say, "Life of Brian.")

Was it because the Jesus in Good Omens was clearly suffering while they, two emissary from a "higher authority," watched without doing anything to mitigate that suffering or even seemed to have much sympathy (never mind that earlier, there was a lovely and VERY RADICAL discussion about WTF with the flood, God, why would you kill all these people because you're feeling pissy? EXCELLENT question and one many non-Christians have wondered!)? Was it the fact that the stigma were clearly being placed in the CORRECT place? So, that added some kind of "historical" accuracy that made the humor hard to deal with, what?  I mean, was it the implication that the God of the Old Testament was not, in point of fact, any kinder than the God of the New? That does, by the way, seem to be a theme, given that God's army clearly WANT the end of the world and war, so you wouldn't think JUST that scene would be gasp-worthy if you were going to be offended by how God is being portrayed in this series. 

Thoughts?

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    1 23
4 56 78910
111213 14151617
181920 21222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 22nd, 2025 08:18 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios