Movies and Comics
Jul. 17th, 2012 10:52 amI've been hearing a lot of hoopla about the new Batman movie and "spoilers." What confuses me is that I would have thought most people know what happens to Batman when he meets Bane. It was a pretty big deal when the comicbook came out, and considering that I, a Marvel fan, even have a clue makes me think that, in fandom at least, nothing that happens at the end of the movie should be a surprise. Especially given the cover art of that particular issue. It's memorable. It kind of sticks in my brain, even after all this time. In fact, knowing what I do is why I actually have no plans to see this movie.
I guess I've always been confused about the lack of cross-pollinization in these two fandoms. Marvel's latest movies have only made me convinced that EVERYONE reads the comics, because the directors so clearly give us long-time comicbook fans so many GIFTS. Also, the movies are full of "dog-whistles" for comicbook fans--just setting the Thor movie in the southwest made me understand WHICH Thor I could be expecting. And, then as a bonus, we got a little nod to the older Thor with the "Dr. Donald Blake" referrence.
Genuis.
Or not, I guess, if you don't get it.
Because, what, only two days ago, people on the Internets got the screaming heebie-jeebies at the announcement at ComicCon of the mere TITLE of the next Captain America movie, which is simply, "Winter Soldier." Now, if they're not reading, what are they getting excited about? I mean, I'm squeeing. I may even have squeed my pants a little when I heard the title, because I've gone on record saying that I was PRAYING they were setting up "Winter Soldier" in the first Cap movie, what with the dog-whistles of Bucky's age and the scene where he breifly uses the sheild before falling off the train to his apparent doom...
So are Comic movie fans, not comic fans? I haz teh confuses.
I guess I've always been confused about the lack of cross-pollinization in these two fandoms. Marvel's latest movies have only made me convinced that EVERYONE reads the comics, because the directors so clearly give us long-time comicbook fans so many GIFTS. Also, the movies are full of "dog-whistles" for comicbook fans--just setting the Thor movie in the southwest made me understand WHICH Thor I could be expecting. And, then as a bonus, we got a little nod to the older Thor with the "Dr. Donald Blake" referrence.
Genuis.
Or not, I guess, if you don't get it.
Because, what, only two days ago, people on the Internets got the screaming heebie-jeebies at the announcement at ComicCon of the mere TITLE of the next Captain America movie, which is simply, "Winter Soldier." Now, if they're not reading, what are they getting excited about? I mean, I'm squeeing. I may even have squeed my pants a little when I heard the title, because I've gone on record saying that I was PRAYING they were setting up "Winter Soldier" in the first Cap movie, what with the dog-whistles of Bucky's age and the scene where he breifly uses the sheild before falling off the train to his apparent doom...
So are Comic movie fans, not comic fans? I haz teh confuses.
no subject
Date: 2012-07-17 04:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-07-17 04:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-07-17 04:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-07-17 05:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-07-17 05:08 pm (UTC)I know what you're saying, though. I'm a little nervous that they seem to be going RIGHT THERE too. Of course, I'm always nervous with every new announcement. This is my fandom. Things could go so... badly, especially now that they're blockbuster movies.
no subject
Date: 2012-07-17 05:41 pm (UTC)I never read Winter Soldier; I only heard about it I think from you, or maybe someone else around the same time when they mentioned that The Rule Had Been Broken. What little I've learned about Winter Soldier did not encourage me to read it.
You mentioned actually picking things back UP in Civil War; Civil War was long after I stopped, and what I learned about it (partly because for a while it looked like I was going to be doing videogame scripts for it) told me it was a total crock of crap, Marvel pissing all over its own creations about the way that DC is right now with its obscene "reboot". (Bitter? About the way they've debased Princess Koriand'r? Me? Never.)
So I suspect that while we enjoy some of the same things, there are also a lot of things we look for in comics that are very different.
no subject
Date: 2012-07-17 04:11 pm (UTC)I have no idea who Bane is. I have no idea who the Winter Soldier is. This is because I stopped regularly reading comics a long time ago. But, if you don't consider me a comic fan, I shall have to ask you who Kent Nelson was and why, if he so chose, he could have kicked Superman's butt!
no subject
Date: 2012-07-17 05:01 pm (UTC)Also, the reboot of Thor isn't bad either, J. Michael Strazcynski (sp?) did a pretty good job with it.
Bane was long enough ago, I thought people knew. Perhaps I only know because my cousin Jonathan called me up in near-tears over this particular villian.
no subject
Date: 2012-07-17 04:19 pm (UTC)There are multiple audiences. The ones who know nothing about Winter Soldier won't be screaming about the spoilers. The ones who DO know will, or might not if they don't care about spoilers. The ones who don't know who Bane is will be the ones complaining about spoilers that tell them what's going to happen, while the people who do know who Bane is won't care about the spoilers, but may well whine vocally about any changes they see. And so on.
There's not one audience for these things, there's many. Given how "big" Avengers got to be, there's a large proportion of that audience that may never have READ a superhero comic book, and those who have, hadn't read one for twenty years. But there'll also be large detachments of devoted comic book fans in there, too. And different groups in there -- some who barely know anything about Spider-Man but followed Thor religiously, others who thought Cap was The Man but never paid attention to Iron Man, and some who read everything they could get their hands on.
no subject
Date: 2012-07-17 05:05 pm (UTC)I know just enough to be dangerous, but I have to admit to being surprised at how much of an "insider" the Marvel movies made me feel. I guess I've gotten spoiled being pandered to this way.
no subject
Date: 2012-07-17 05:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-07-17 05:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-07-17 05:10 pm (UTC)I was just realizing that I probably know Bane so well because of my nephew's reaction when he was reading Batman. I guess a lot of the old-timers don't know Bane. That's cool. The movie is going to be pretty dang shocking, then....
no subject
Date: 2012-07-17 05:34 pm (UTC)I don't think it's an age thing at all. I think it's comic readers vs. non-readers, which come in all ages. A gazillion people who never cracked open a comic in their lives go to comic-inspired movies.
no subject
Date: 2012-07-18 07:30 am (UTC)Firstly, it may not necessarily depend on age, but when you started reading comics. I pretty much read no US comics (apart from Dark Knight Returns at university) until I picked up the Sandman books when I was in my late 20s (I'm mid-40s now.) I've caught up on some back story but there's so much of it for both DC and Marvel universes that I'm only peripherally aware of some of it.
I know vaguely what happens between Batman and Bane simply because I've seen it mentioned online by various people, not because I've read the relevant comics (yet). Similarly, I know vaguely about the Winter Soldier because I read the Civil War books - where the Winter Soldier is mentioned in passing - and the Death of Captain America stuff.
There is a huge amount of backstory, even in relatively recent years, in comics. So if you come in at a certain point, how much of the older stuff can you know?
I sort of think of it as rather like how people consume Doctor Who these days. Some people have come in and fallen in love with New Who (i.e. since the 2005 revival) Some of those have gone back and watched Old Who (as is only right and proper!) others will only know what happened pre-New Who by what's mentioned in passing in the new series and what people mention in conversation or online.
And there's a lot less of that than there is old comics!
ミュウミュウ 長財布 ピンク
Date: 2013-03-18 06:35 pm (UTC)[url=http://www.miumiubagsoutletjapan.com]ミュウミュウ バッグ[/url]http://www.miumiubagsoutletjapan.com
ルイヴィトン 財布 メンズ
Date: 2013-04-09 01:33 am (UTC)[url=http://www.lvbagsonoutletjp.com]ルイヴィトン バッグ 新作[/url]http://www.lvbagsoutletonjapan.com
[url=http://www.lvbagsonoutletjp.com]ヴィトン 長財布[/url]2013最新のルイヴィトン 財布,本店は有名なルイビトン 店舗として,ルイビトン ハンドバックを最安値価格で販売しています!ルイヴィトン激安限定割引85%!
no subject
Date: 2013-04-12 09:38 am (UTC)With that said, together with the quite a few custom made baggage to be found to choose from, just how can any individual consider the greatest yet much more necessary in contrast to other folks? You need to be aware of the home benefit some bag one of the trustworthiness of the internet theme, styling, nicely artist. As well as you may also side fairness to an alternative ladies handbag type even so, if more appealing then famed women determine the products usually whilst returning important and vital conditions within lifetime.[url=http://www.miumiunewbagsjapan.com]miu miu 財布[/url]http://www.miumiunewbagsjapan.com
Blake Successful sometimes appears picking Kate Folding shovel.
[url=http://www.hermesbagsonlinesalesjp.com]エルメス 店舗[/url]8-10. Fendi
Burberry enjoys their just verify development hallmark. This can be a single that come with an idea regarding superior shopping bags on earth. Any individual staying noticed putting on this particular Burberry quality might be welcomed that has a "Wow!"
[url=http://www.hermesbagsonlinesalesjp.com]エルメス バッグ[/url]http://www.hermesbagsonlinesalesjp.com
Their email list should never are already best but with no New York-based deluxe wet fabric supplies, the actual Train. This example entire capped their email list when using the elements your shopping bags try beyond the understanding of a great deal adult females on the Educate complete.