lydamorehouse: (crazy eyed Renji)
 There are two things I think would make Hollywood/Disney 743 ZILLION dollars only I'm certain they will never, ever do them... or, if they somehow do, they'll do them badly. 

1. "Lady" Loki, aka Loki in their female form.  So, I saw the new Thor teaser trailer and just about lost my mind.  For a very brief moment, before everyone on the internet crushed my dreams. I thought that unmasked Hela was Loki.  I thought, "Blessed Mother, they've done it. They're going with gender fluid Loki." Loki, who *is* canonically gender fluid (both in the comic books and the myths), should really be the focus of this new movie since, last we saw, Loki had seized Asgard.  A movie of Thor v. Loki would pretty much send all the fan grrls and boyz into a frenzy the same way seeing Tony/Bucky/Steve in Captain America: Civil War did. Gender fluid Loki with hot female lead + already smoking hot Tom Hiddleston = 345.2 ZILLION DOLLARS in profit. I swear to all the gods, Marvel/Disney.  Just do it. Watch people line up and scream, "Just take my money already!"

2. Then I saw the new Star Wars trailer and thought, "Meh, okay, but WHERE'S MY QUEER POLY KISS between Poe/Finn/Rey???!!" I like Naomi's reaction when I posed that question on FB. "Maybe they're saving it for the next teaser?" Because honestly, if I don't get AT LEAST a Poe/Finn romance/subtext I will be very unhappy.  I will give you my vision of how I'd love to see a tiny (harmless) scene go:
 
Rey (leans into cockpit to give Finn a kiss): Good luck on the mission!

Finn (smiles happily at her, then turns to Poe, leans over to kiss him): Good luck on the mission!

Poe (looks at Rey)

Rey (looks at Poe)

Poe and Rey (simultaneously give each other the thumbs up!) 

I know there's a big contingent of people who are really rooting for ace Rey. I'm okay with Rey having no romantic interest in the movie (though it would be even cooler if she were EXPLICITLY asexual.) But, I think that this OT3 thing would be amaze balls.  

So of course they'll never do it.

OT3!

lydamorehouse: (Bazz-B)
"Does that girl EVER shut up?"

"Who gives the nurse at a doctor's appointment a business card?"

"Do you think she's really an author, or... really, really STONED?"

"Cheerful as fuck, though. I should probably get some of whatever drugs she's on."

"Because, who has so much energy at eight am?"

"It must be caffeine."

"I'm totally going to look up this 'Tate Hallaway' person, because she's hilarious. Is monster erotica really a thing?"

"Can't be from around here, though. WAY. TOO. LOUD.."

#

Seriously, what is wrong with me?

I was in to see a dermatologist because, you know, my warranty expired at 48, and Shawn noticed a weird little growth on my cheek. (I TOLD you that my blogs would suddenly be all medical issues all the time!) Anyway, so there I was, and I might have had a little too much coffee and was already wound up because I rage quit watching Jessica Jones (more on that in a bit) and I dunno, the nurse was nice, okay? And, I just didn't feel up for the Minnesota call-and-response so t stopped trying to pretend like I knew when the hell anything happened with my body.

Her: "How long ago have you had the growth on your face?"

Me: "Who even knows? You'd think I'd notice a thing on my face. It's not like I don't look in the mirror every damn day, but I must have just dismissed it as 'weird thing that seems harmless.' I'm only here because my wife worries."

Her: ...

Her: "Um, okay..."

Me: "I've had coffee. Maybe too much."

Her: ... *smiles nervously* "Yeah, okay. I get that. So what do you do for a living?"

Me: *already reaching for business cards* "I have the most awesome job. You won't even *believe* how cool it is."

The nurse agrees that being published is, in point of fact, WICKED cool and goes on to confess that she LOVES to read and she's super-sad that she hasn't be able to read for pleasure because she's in the middle of school (she's going for her RN, I asked,) and, yes, paranormal romances are RIGHT up her alley and her husband LOVES science fiction and she WILL take that card, could I write down a few titles? She goes away and I get undressed and stuff. When the doctor comes in, I can tell the nurse was talking about me, because the doc smiles brightly at me and says, "I hear you're a famous author," to which I reply, "Yes, award-winning."

Because I f*cking have NO shame.

And, because this is a skin check, I'm basically saying all this COMPLETELY NAKED. I mean, yes, I have a sheet draped over me, but the doctor is checking out my boobs and butt, because that's her job, and all the while I'm yacking away about why I have a pseudonym (a lot of people don't understand the mechanics of why you would, and when I told the doctor that the romances are under a different name, she was very curious why that would be.)

I'm SURE I was the talk of the office after I left.

On the other hand, I may have sold a few more books.

Speaking of creative content, I'm watching Netflix's Jessica Jones. I just rage quit in the middle of episode 5. I may go back, but I'm having serious problems with this show. I will put the spoilers under a cut, but let me first say that "noir" and "dark" shouldn't mean humorless and unthinking. The epic fan fic I write has been categorized as dark because I tackle hard issues realistically. But that doesn't mean that my characters are inhuman to one another (at least not ALL THE TIME) or that there aren't moments of lightness and insight and kindness. Jessica Jones misses some opportunities for clever humor, IMHO, that could go a long way to making the characters sympathetic. As it stands, I don't like anyone on the show (with the exception of a hapless neighbor.) Read more... )
lydamorehouse: (crazy eyed Renji)
 Mild SPOILERS not under cut
.
.
.
.
 

Last night, I saw Ant Man with my usual MCU crew (Eleanor Arnason and Sean M. Murphy). I have to admit to some trepidation going into this film.  For one, I was never a huge Henry Pym/Ant Man fan when I read him in the Avenger comic books in the mid-1970s/early-1980s when he was, ironically, mostly Yellowjacket (and sometimes Giant Man).  Also, having heard that the Ant Man of the MCU would be Scott Lang, I was a bit worried that was like having a Captain America movie with John Walker wearing the cowl.

Generally, I have to say the movie was fun.  It was a good heist film, with a hilarious "crew" (which, let's be fair, included ants.)  I was particularly fond of Luis, whose only superpower, apparently, is his mean upper cut,  with which he reputably remains the only inmate to have successfully knocked out the meanest thug in San Quentin.  And, of course, his amazing storytelling style.  I think we should all start petitioning now for Luis to have his own comic book title. (Unless already does, in which case someone please point me to them STAT!)

Unlike other films in the MCU, however, I didn't have a single nerdgasm at any particular moment.  Again, this is probably very much due to my not reading much of Ant Man, and him not being as iconic a character as, say, Tony Stark/Iron Man.  (Because I think I own exactly ONE Iron Man, but he's a feature in so many titles I've read, including, of course, the Civil War mega-arc, that I knew a lot about him and his villains, sidekicks, etc., going in.)   Yes, I say 'not iconic' knowing FULL WELL Ant Man was a founding Avenger along with the Wasp.  Thing is, you ask your average, on the street fan and they will laugh and say, "ANT... man?  Really?  Ant??"  (Well, not any more, but they did.)  Also,and this I will put under a cut ) 

In fact, I am starting to be slightly irritated by the seemingly 'one woman per film' rule Marvel has going on.  Yes, we get a five second cameo of another one and that person's story was critical to the plot, but... COME ON.  As much as I adored the 'heist crew,' I fail to see why ONE of them couldn't have been a lady.  The get-away driver, maybe?

Yes, Hope Pym was fairly bassassagain since this might be significant later... )--though my complaint there seems to be that badass is  the only mode Marvel can do lady in, atm (well, badass or vaguely undeveloped in the case of the Wanda Maximoff/Scarlet Witch in Age of Ultron.)  So, besides "child in distress," I could have used a few more female faces. Marvel has a lot of female superheroes to choose from, and, you know, statistically there are just more of us alive at any given time.  


I'm a huge Marvel fan.  I had fun at Ant Man.  This isn't a huge 'boo.'  I just think it's one of those thing that I'm putting on my 'watch this' list.



lydamorehouse: (ichigo being adorbs)
St. Paul didn't close schools today.

The wind chills are expected to reach -35 F (-37.22 C for my foreign friends--also is this right?  I don't know that my converter can handle minus temps). Winds are expected at 15 to 25 mph. How wind chill works is that it's "the measure of the perceived decrease in air temperature felt by the body on exposed skin due to the flow of air."  Another fun fact is that when the real temperature is -19 F, exposed skin can freeze in one minute.  The REAL temp outside at the moment is -23 F.  (My family thinks the skin freezing thing is false, well, fine: it's still colder here that it is on some parts of Mars.)

Minneapolis closed school.  

For a point of reference, Minneapolis is 10 blocks from my house to the west.  I can drive down University Avenue for less than a minute and arrive in Minneapolis.  

So... Mason is home today because I'm not sure what St. Paul is smoking, but it's not safe.

St. Paul has decided that all absences are excused today, at least, but we would have kept Mason out regardless and he doesn't even wait for a bus.  Why?  Well, firstly, in protest, because most other people do have to wait outside and buses do not run on time always.  Secondly, because the last time we decided to go in temperatures like these our car broke down and Shawn and Mason had to walk several blocks home while I was forced to sit in the car to wait for triple-A.  I was lucky, our break down was tire related and I could have heat, but our car door also sticks open and super-cold temps, so I was really very chilly.  

The decision, St. Paul has said on its Facebook discussion about this, was partly to aid homeless youth for whom school is the one place they can get a regular meal.  At the same time they announced this, a call went out to the neighborhood for warm winter coats for homeless kids because there's a real shortage.  So, St. Paul required homeless kids to leave the warmth of their shelters, wait for the bus without winter coats, just for a meal?  I'm not entirely sure how well all that works in terms of logic. 

So, yeah, that's my morning.

As I just told my friend in Wales when she asked me if I was writing--not yet, I have to drink more coffee and complain about the weather.  It's the Minnesotan thing to do.

:-)

I also thought I do a very mini review of Ms. Marvel #10.  My subscription finally came, btw.  Long ago, I decided to subscribe to Ms. Marvel because at CONvergence many years ago, I was on a panel with Sigrid Ellis, who suggest that the best way to support women comic book writers was to subscribe to the titles they wrote.  So, dutifully, I went to Marvel.com and put in my credit card info.  I was pretty sure I was being ripped off because nothing ever came.  Turns out, I apparently signed on to start AFTER #9.  At any rate, #10 "Generation Why" showed up at my doorstep a couple of days ago.  

Read more... spoilers.... )

In general, I'm just as happy my subscription starts now.  I'm looking forward to seeing what happens next (though I'm really hoping for an actual defeat for the Inventor soon).  I really like G. Willow Wilson's voice for Kamala.  Like my example under the cut, it's funny and sharp and smart.  Also, I'm growing very fond of Adrian Alphona's art.  It's stylized, but in a way I like?




lydamorehouse: (shield)
Those of you reading on Dreamwidth will see a new icon, Captain America's shield:



This will serve as a warning that I'm about to talk far too much about the Marvel Universe (comic books or movies) with probably very little other bits about my life.

Before I start on my Marvel stuff, though I want you all to know that once again I got a 99% percent on my Japanese quiz. This may sound as if I'm acing this class, but I thought about it a lot last night. One of my fellow classmates, Mint, has this wonderful pronunciation, right? He didn't do nearly as well on the quiz as I did. I think the reason for that is simple: anime. I'm really, really accustomed to LISTENING to Japanese because I listen to it at LEAST once a week (sometimes daily when I'm on a dishwashing/watching spree.) I think this means that I can hear the distinct words better than my classmates, because the quiz is that Tetsuya-sensei says the word (or occasionally phrase) in Japanese and we write down the English version. God forbid it be the other way around, that I would have to SAY the Japanese to his English. Half the time he looks at me like, "WTF are you even trying to say, Lyda-san?" when I do try.

So, you know.

Given that that's why I'm taking the class--a desire to hear and understand Japanese better, I feel I'm doing great. But if I were hoping to talk to someone Japanese, I think I still have a really, really long way to go.

Okay, so Marvel...

I just found out this morning that the new Captain America movie is subtitled "Civil War."

I'm so excited that I could squee my pants. Seriously. As I was telling my friend in Wales this morning, "Civil War" was the arc/storyline that truly brought me back to reading comic books regularly again after about a decade or so hiatus. I know I've written about it here when I was reviewing comic books more regularly and I also know that it's a bone of contention for a lot of Marvel fans.

Regardless about how you might feel about Civil War as it happened in the comic books, I feel like it's a good choice for the movie franchise. It seems as if they're already setting Tony Stark up for certain things, given spoilers (minor) though already out in the movie rumor mill ) By the time we get to Captain America 3, he may already be the spoilers if you're unfamiliar with the comic books ) I imagine that a good set of writers could dovetail all that nicely into what needs to happen to pull off a minor, two-hour version of Civil War. Especially if they use Age of Ultron to set up some of the tensions building between Steve Rogers and Tony Stark. Ideally, they'll do this with a background of major Civil War comic story line spoilers )

Ultimately, though, that's the problem, isn't it? Taking on these gigantic story lines and trying to distill them into two hours often means that some of the important character moments, etc. get lost in the Hollywood need for explosions.  Civil War appeals, I'm sure, because it comes with villains we already know and a lot of opportunity for every fans' wet dream of the versus, i.e. Hulk vs. Thor!  Who would win??  

And it's going to get complicated as they draw from earlier story lines like the Infinity Gauntlet, which is one I remember from when I was a youngster.  

So, I don't know.  I guess, fingers crossed?  Other Marvel fans, your thoughts?

Also, I have to admit that I'm not super-fond of the casting of Benedict Cumberbatch as Steven Strange.  I'm not necessarily against it, but Mr. Cumberbatch is currently overexposed.  I don't feel like the Marvel 'verse particularly needed him.  It would have been more interesting for my money if they'd gone with someone far less well known, like Oded Fahr.  I know there's no particular reason to cast an Israeli actor in the role of the very white Dr. Strange, but then there was no reason to cast Idris Elba as Heimdall EXCEPT THAT HE WAS THE MOST AWESOME HELMDALL EVER.  So, you know, it can work.  Also, it would make sense to case Strange as a PoC if only because it could have mitigated some of the awkward of the manservant Wong.  Some.  Honestly, I'm not sure how they're going to deal with Wong or a lot of the overt-Orientalism that permeates the Strange title.

TBF, that may have changed.  I think the last time I picked up the Dr. Strange title I was 12.  Though someone on FB told me that Wong is still there, acting more like Jarvis (which I'm not sure is different from his past or any better in terms of the racist stereotyping.)

So that whole thing could be interesting.  I particularly loved what my nephew John had to say about it which was, "If they shoehorn in an appearance by Loki just to make Tumblr poop itself, I refuse to see this film."

Tumblr may very well poop itself that that mere suggestion.  I'll be okay as long as they don't cast Martin Freeman as Wong.

lydamorehouse: (more renji art)
If you've been awake these last few days (and hang out in fannish circles on the Internet), you probably heard that Marvel is introducing a new Thor, a female Thor.  She looks pretty awesome to me, so I'm not quite sure what has certain fans in an uproar.  As a long time Thor reader, there is one single qualification in my mind to be Thor.  You must be worthy of Mjolnir.

For those of you just tuning in, comic book fans will happily explain that Thor not being Thor is so yesterday.  We've had a horse-faced space alien (a fan favorite, in fact,) Beta Ray Bill.  We've had, I kid you not, a frog.  All of those who welded Mjolnir before were WORTHY.  So long as this person is, I could care less.

Different people take on iconic hero titles all the time.  Do you even know how many Captain Americas we've had? At least one of them was insane, another had been a recently brainwashed super-assassin for the Russians.  So, you know, in the average life of a Marvel fan, this kind of thing is very ho-hum.

I was particularly struck by what it means (to me, at least,) to be a Marvel fan as I was finally reading through the Entertainment Weekly article about the new Avengers movie, Age of Ultron.  The article laid out the reason why the movie writers of the script decided not to make Henry Pym the inventor of Ultron.  I read that and thought, like a Marvel fan does, "Huh.  Okay, why not?"

"Huh.  Okay, why not?" could be a Marvel fan's mantra.

How about we reboot the entire mutant franchise when a villain goes back in time to kill Professor X? Huh.  Okay, why not?  (The Age of Apocalypse is still one of my favorite canon AUs.)

How about we replace a ton of your favorite superheroes with Skrull?  Huh.  Okay, why not?  (Secret Invasion. I  was less sold, but you know what, this is Marvel.)

How about the new Director of S.H.I.E.L.D. is a super-villain?  Huh.  Okay, why not? (Dark Reign.  Didn't read it, but am planning to try to collect it.)

The list goes on and on and on, and two thirds of my above examples are actually fairly recent developments, and don't even get me started on the whole Ultimates concept.  (For those of you who aren't comic book fans, Ultimates is like Marvel said, I wish we could re-write some stuff, and the PtB said, you can!  We'll just make it an AU fic, but because we're the bosses, it'll be canon because we can just make up a whole new set of titles for you!)

You know, it's like I tell new Attack on Titan fans--don't get too attached and roll with the punches.  Most of the time, the story carries you through all your fears.  Sure, sometimes it's stupid.  But, Marvel has, what now?  At LEAST 60 years of canon, some titles running weekly, bi-weekly, or monthly without interruption in all that times.  There's got to be some stupid given the sheer vastness of canon.  And, writers and artists can change mid-storyline, so Marvel fans have learned to cope in MULTIPLE ways.  I mean, I'll be honest, for me, I've been known not to finish a story because there's been a major writer shake up (still don't know how everything worked out after Straczynski left Amazing Spider-Man).

My friend [livejournal.com profile] empty_mirrors asked me how does Marvel deal with people getting older, and I said, "They don't."  Given the mess of the above, there's really no reason to.  Readers have learned to say, "Huh.  Okay, why not?" when confronted by the fact that Reed Richards is stated in canon to have fought in WWII.  Writers tend not to bring that up.  Or, when they do, they get points for coming up with clever work arounds.  Honestly, a lot of us long-time fans appreciate when writers like Bendis slide in a line for Peter Parker like, "Look, how weird can it be?  I once had four arms!"

Because, yes, yes he did.

And that's the other thing Marvel comics are made for readers to come and go from it.  New readers can pick up a title at any point and go from there.  I've done it when I've come back to story lines.  But fans drop out, new fans come in, old fans return, etc., etc.

And sometimes Thor is a woman.
lydamorehouse: (more renji art)
At the library yesterday, I gravitated toward my usual favorite section to shelve: teen (because they have all the manga and the comic books.) So, I came across this:

APR110728_1

Black Widow: The Name of the Rose (Margorie Liu/Daniel Acuña). According to the back cover copy, "collecting Black Widow 1-5, plus some material from Heroic Age #1."

When I started it, I was a little afraid it was going to make me feel old again, like the new Hawkeye title did. The art is similar, but deeper:

tumblr_m64y2u7IUa1r2v9ujo5_1280

But, for some reason, I really enjoyed the heck out of this title. I think maybe it's partly the fact that Black Widow is super-competient. She also gets beaten up, being mostly human, like Clint, but... she's just so much smarter and independent. Looking back to Hawkeye at the scene where Clint can't figure out how to untangle his cords for his entertainment system and calls Iron Man/Tony Stark, it's hard not to compare it to the time Stark is called in here... to find out that the reason Black Widow was attack was because she was secretly carrying a recording device, collecting spy information on EVERYONE (ally and enemy alike). Clint comes off as a moron; Natasha kicked your butt and you didn't even know it.

There are also a couple of scene that made me hyper-aware of Black Widow's sexuality. Guess what, guys, she has boobs. But, what SHOULD feel like gratuitous fan service never entirely did--even the scene where she's tied up, naked. I think the reason was because she comes off so completely unfazed by it. Like, 'ho-hum' bad guys are trying to make me feel vulnerable using my gender. Ah, well, I guess I'll just have to escape and KICK THEIR A$$ES WHILE COMPLETELY NUDE.

It's weirdly awesome.

I recommend it.
lydamorehouse: (more renji art)
Some time ago, a friend and I had been IMing and she'd asked me about where to start with comic books as an Avenger movie fan.  I'd told her about several of the collected volumes I enjoyed, and particularly mentioned that, as a Marvel movie fan she might want to check out the four volumes of Ed Brubaker's CAPTAIN AMERICA: Winter Solider and Strazynski's re-boot of THOR, since clearly elements of those had appeared in the movies.  Being polite and not raised by wolves, I asked, "So, what are you reading?"

She recommended the new HAWKEYE (by Matt Fraction).  So, I checked it out. I read both of the volumes that the library had: HAWKEYE: My Life as a Weapon and HAWKEYE: Little Shots.

I've decided that maybe I'm too old for this title.  The main artist is someone called David Aja and his art is very... what's the word I want?  Kind of "indy"?  I'm not sure.  Here's what it looks like:

Unknown-1

I can't say I dislike the art, but it has a flat, slick feeling.  The stories follow Clint Barton (aka Hawkeye) in his life in New York City.  This is one of the things I tend to really adore about Marvel, in general, which is that a lot of the story is about what a screwed up life Clint has made for himself and how much it honestly sucks to be nothing more than a sharp-shooting archer in a team full of super-soldiers and gods.  Clint gets banged-up.  A lot.  Actually, you kind of start to wonder if Hawkeye's real superpower is the ability to get fairly seriously wounded and still live, despite not having a mutant healing factor. They also do some fun things with his stupid-a$$ arrow collection (because, seriously?  How dumb is that?).  At one point during the story he decides what he really needs to is organize everything and you know, maybe mark them with tape or something, so he doesn't accidentally reach for the smoke-bomb when he needs the exploding tip.  The trip to the hardware store to get tape becomes it's own adventure, of course, in the way of such things, and he ends up randomly using whatever comes to hand, as it were.  That's just funny.

But Clint really isn't that interesting on his own.  Frankly, he never has been.  When my cousin Laun and I used to play pretend Avengers, I would often be Hawkeye because... well, back in the 70s, it was clear Hawkeye was the hip friend to Captain America.  And he was handsome, clever, and charming.  (I always liked playing the hot guys.  Charisma 18+ FTW).   But, kind of an empty slate, really.  At least from my reading, which admittedly wasn't terribly deep.  Laun was always the bigger Avengers fan.

I'm not sure the reboot does Clint any favors.  He's constantly upstaged by more interesting cameos, including one by his adoptive dog, Arrow (shown above.) HAWKEYE: Little Shot has a series of misadventures with the women in Clint's life, complete with Romance Comics style covers, in between each section.

But, a lot of people called each other 'bro,' and a lot of the action was kind of disjointed in a way that made me feel... tired, and too old for this title.  Also?  Who prints this stuff so small?  I needed my reading glasses!

Yet, I'm glad I read it.  There was a tiny little throw-away scene that kind of fascinated me.  It showed PowerMan (aka Luke Cage) and Spider-Man (Peter Parker, 'natch) sitting around Avengers/Stark Tower playing video games.  Peter was in his Spidey suit, like he often is, hanging upside down with his legs crossed, like he does, and apparently getting his ass kicked by Cage.  It occurred to me that I bet Spider-Man sucks at video games.  I bet he sucks because a big part of his ability is his Spidey Sense.  I bet he spends a lot of time getting blind-sided by stuff that seems, from his perspective, to come out of nowhere.

Also, can we talk, Peter?  You were the only guy in "uniform" at the mansion/tower.  What's that about?  (Truth? I suspect it's because Parker is actually intentionally nondescript.)

Well, so I guess my recommendation:  Go ahead, give a try, with a caveat--it's very... arty, maybe 'modern' even.  I don't even know if that's a bug or a feature.  Milage will vary.

And, in other news, there *is* video from Wednesday night:



It's a lot of reading, but if you want to hear my squee about Anime and random things, skip to the last five minutes or so.
lydamorehouse: (more renji art)
Uffdah, as they say around here.  Mason is back at school after three weeks hiatus, and every SINGLE Crossroads parent seemed to have forgotten how to use the parking lot. I'm lucky I'm not still there (or responsible for some car/child accident!)

This weekend, Mason spent part of his time at KidCON, which is [livejournal.com profile] naomikritzer's gaming gathering of friends.  Mason came back really wanting to play Munchkin with us.  We have a basic set, and I've now been tasked to pick up a booster packs, if they have them, at MarsCON.  It was, admittedly, a lot of fun and totally got me jonesing for my RPGing days.  And Mason is the kind of person--not unlike myself--who actually ENJOYS hearing the tales of campaigns past, so I got to tell him about Fred Fumble, the Moon-Moon of the elf world, who routinely stumbled into his campaign mates and did THEM damage during a fight.  Fred's other name could have been Friendly Fire Fred.

It makes me wonder.... am I still one phone call away from a game?  If I asked around, could I find a D&D/RPG going down  RIGHT NOW to hook up with???

I used to joke that RPGs were my drug of choice, because if you go down the "Are you an Alcoholic/Drug Addict?" AA/NA pamphlet check list, "Do you have a hidden stash?" etc., my answers were often YES, if bent to include words like "of dice" or similar.  Do you think about gaming when you're not gaming?  OMG YES.  Do you schedule your life/change plans with others so you can game?  OMG YES.  Have you ever skipped work to game?  OMG YES.  The big one was always, "Could you get your drug of choice with one phone call/within the hour?"

Could I?  I used to be able to.  I had at least two friends on speed dial that were GMs who I probably could have talked into gathering something RIGHT NOW.  Actually, I bet I could... I still know gamers and their husbands/partners.

The other thing we did over the weekend was finally watch "The Wolverine."  True confession time: I can't remember every single detail of the Japan Saga.  I'm not even sure I ever read the Claremont & Miller original 4(?) issue miniseries in 1982 or if I caught up with Logan and Yukio later when Buscema penciled.  I have only the vaguest memories of those issues, and they kind of go like this: Yukio = kick ass; Makoto Mariko = tragic love interest (wife?); Silver Samurai = cool and adamantium.  The rest is lost to the annals of time or have been replaced by Bleach trivia.

Even with so little, I still feel like the movie betrayed my SACRED MEMORIES.

I will say, the filming on location, that was beautiful.  I wanted to live in all the houses they were in, particularly Mariko's bolthole in Nagasaki.  I also wanted her to feed me the nabemono she cooked Wolverine when they were there.

But the rest?  How did they make a cool arc so uncool?

I mean, Japan is just cool.  I don't know how you mess up Japan.  They even go to a love hotel and it's not nearly as funny and awkward and 'WTF, Japan?' as it should be.  There is talk of honor, but, I think, ultimately, it's hollow....particularly for the one person it should never be: Wolverine.

Shawn, half way through the film, turned to me and said, "They're making Wolverine nothing more than a brutish thug."  Casual fans of Wolverine might say, "And?" Isn't that his character?  No, it's really not, nor has it ever been.  Shawn is a much, MUCH bigger Wolverine fan than I am, but I can tell you the simple Marvel formula that sums up what Wolverine is about:  Wolverine is a beast struggling to be a man.

Wolverine stories, when they're at their best, tap this core issue.  I feel like (and I may be misremembering since I, frankly, remember almost nothing,) Claremont's Japan Saga and subsequent Japan arcs deal with this in a unique way--the idea of Wolverine as a ronin, as a masterless samurai.  They said those words in "The Wolverine" but they never meant them.  The writers of "The Wolverine" seemed to think this meant ronin = wild, lawless thug.  When, in fact, ronin should equal a lost soul that desperately craves honor and a code to live by.  This is a good analogy for Wolverine's constant struggle to tame his inner demon. Claremont knew that (I think.)  Or, if he didn't, subsequent writers who took on the Japan Wolverine really hammered that into my subconscious.

"The Wolverine" screwed this up a number of ways.  They did that thing modern superhero movies often get wrong, they focus on the super and not the HERO.  At one point Wolverine comes across one of the baddies and LITERALLY thows him over a hotel balcony.  We see that he's survived the fall by landing in a pool, but Yukio says, "How did you know that pool was there." Wolverine says, in full-on badass mode, "I didn't."

But, see, right attitude, WRONG MOVE.  Of all the Marvel heroes, Wolverine is most-likely-to-thoughtlessly-slaughter, but a good writer makes him suffer those moments because Logan/Wolverine doesn't WANT be only a beast.  Similarly, there's a moment when Wolverine sticks his chopsticks upright in the rice bowl and Mariko explains the chopstick taboo to him (which has to do with funerals and being considered bad luck/bad taste), but then he does it again.

I mean, okay, Wolverine is a brute.  This is one of the reasons I never entirely cottoned to him as character in the comic books.  However, I always felt that Mariko/Japan was one of the things that civilized him in a very sympathetic way.  I mean, it's classic, right? The love of a woman tames the wild man.  I'm pretty sure that started with Enkidu and is a total trope, but it's a good one... and it works with Wolverine, IMHO, because sometimes the love is slightly more platonic, like his relationship with Kitty Pryde.  And with Mariko/Japan there was (at least in my head) this lovely combination of love and HONOR.

The movie didn't seem to even try to go there, which is weird, because it was kind of slow in places.  If they were going to skip the character stuff, just SKIP IT, and go right into the ninja pile up, you know?

Ah, well, opportunities lost.  Once again, Hollywood neglected to call me.  I'm not sure what they're thinking when they don't tap me, honestly.

In other news, if you're curious about the other members of my writers' group, Wyrdsmiths, today on our blog Kelly McCullough is the featured interviewee.  Check it out: http://wyrdsmiths.blogspot.com/2014/03/kelly-mccullough-writes-fantasy-science.html

In IN

Nov. 12th, 2011 02:55 pm
lydamorehouse: (Default)
Okay, we survived the trip to Valpariaso, Indiana. It was, as usual, a VERY long drive, however, we entertained ourselves by letting the .mp3 player choose the music. Our only rule: NO SKIPPING.

We have long believed that the device has had its own agenda. Now we're certain. We probably have thirty or forty big band/40s tunes on the thing out of thousands of songs. What did it play? EVERY SINGLE one. No, it wasn't stuck in genre, because ocassionally it would bust out with some opera, zydeco, or Patsy Cline (or Ella Fitzgerald or other jazz era/old-timey country). We also got some classical. One or two rock songs, but the .mp3 player picked very "easy listening" options.

Given how much rock and blues we have in comparison, this is a pretty clear indication that our .mp3 player has become an AI, complete with its own personality. (I'll double-check, but I don't THINK the brand name is a wholly owned subsidiary of SkyNet.)

We have decided to name our .mp3 player "Cap" in honor of Captain America, since it clearly prefers music that Steve Rogers would appreciate.
lydamorehouse: (Default)
Even though Shawn thought I was fairly crazy, I went out last night with some folks I only sort of know through the Internet and fandom to the midnight showing of "Thor." More than that, I paid over twice the usual price for movie tickets for the privilege.

But you know what? It was AWESOME.

I need to preface anything I have to say about the film by the fact that I'm NOT, nor have I ever been, a Thor fan. As I said before, I remember looking over my cousin Laun's shoulder at various Silver Age issues of Thor. I vaguely followed the Beta Ray Bill storyline of the early 80s. But Thor was never a title I sought out or bought for myself. Of course, I knew about him from his various interactions with the Avengers and other titles that I preferred.

Part of my inability to attach to Thor as a character is, in point of fact, the whole God thing. I was never a big fan of Superman because I like the heroes that bruise more easily. For me part of being heroic is the courage it takes to stand up to powers much stronger than you are. Thor is a freaking God. Hard to be stronger than that.

On top of that rather major character issue, I was also a snotty kid. I thought the title was full of people with strange names and hard to pronounce words, like, Mjöllnir. Plus, people talked weird (and in a weird font) on Asgard. They had very stylized costumes and Jack Kirby made everyone look square (literally) and kind of grumpy.



The writers of the movie deal with the God-issue very nicely, IMHO. I don’t think it’s a spoiler to tell you that, in the movie, Thor gets cast out of Asgard for being a self-centered git. Odin strips him of his powers and, he spends the rest of the film attempting to be worthy of Mjöllnir again. For me, that’s a classic Marvel conundrum. It’s like Spider-Man’s “with great power, comes great responsibility” only it’s more like, “heroes need humility as well as strength to be truly great.” Though, humility isn’t quite the right word in this situation. One of the things I love about what the writers explore in the Thor movie is the idea of what it means to be a hero. The turning point in the movie actually stirred me. I cared about Thor enough to care whether or not he came through the other side of his challenge.

That’s pretty miraculous, IMHO, since normally I could care less.

It helps, though, that the actor who plays Thor (Chris Hemsworth) is a complete hottie. (IMDB just informed me that he played Kirk’s dad in the Star Trek reboot. Cool!)

I also really ended up liking what they did with Loki, who, from my memories of the Thor comic books (which, granted is very sketchy), could very easily have been played as a larger-than-life EVIL villain. What they did in the movie, IMHO, was make him the hero of his own story in a way, frankly, that I found very sympathetic. Both Thor and Loki have serious daddy issues/needs to prove themselves MEN, but they manifest completely differently.



I went to the movie with David J. Schwartz (author of Superpowers) . He was saying that what they did with Loki in the movie is very different from Thor canon. This is one of the moments where not being a hardcore Thor fan probably helped me enjoy the movie more.

Also, my other companion did not like the look of Asgard, but, for me, it looked exactly like something Jack Kirby might have imagined. In fact, all the costuming on Asgard really felt Kirby-esque to me, which could either be a plus or a minus depending on how you feel about his particular style. Though (and I realize this is sort of blasphemy) I normally am not a huge Kirby fan, I thought it really worked in the film.



My last couple comments about the Thor movie is that it seemed clear to me that Kenneth Branaugh is a big, fat fan (very likely of Silver Age Thor). There were lots of “money shots” early and often, including spinning hammers and lightning strikes. I laughed out loud (and sometimes by myself) at a few of the fan insider jokes, including what it probably the best Stan Lee cameo of all the Marvel films.

The biggest flaw in the film was Natalie Porter, who played a revised version of Jane Foster. It was hard to imagine her as a love interest, especially since Darcy Lewis (played by Kat Dennings) is WAY cuter and funnier. I totally fell for her in the movie and could not understand what Thor saw in Jane.

Anyway, for me, it was one of the best Marvel films to-date. Right up there with Ironman (#1).
lydamorehouse: (cap)
My holiday reading included lots of comic books, bought at HPB. Of course, as usual, I seem to collect many of these with issues missing, so my reading of them is full of gaps. Here’s what I’ve read so far:

The Amazing Spider-Man: Grim Hunt, Part 1 (#634) – Kelly /Lark & Gaudiano
The Amazing Spider-Man: Grim Hunt, Part 2 (#635) – Kelly/Lark & Gaudiano
The Amazing Spider-Man: Grim Hunt, Part 3 (#636) – Kelly & Wells/Checchetto, Lark & Gaudiano

Since I don’t really know how all this ends, all I can say was that my lack of Spider-Man history messed me up a bit in this series. I, for instance, had no idea Peter Parker had a failed clone, named after the Biblical first murderer [K]aine, no less. I think the writer(s) understood that a lot of readers might not know much about Kaine, thus there was this utterly depressing back story/mini-story of Kaine’s life previous, complete with a pathetic version of Aunt May, with whom Kaine has a detestable non-relationship with and discovers dead on the stairway. Gah! Since the entire of bit of the arc of “Grim Hunt” seemed to be about redeeming Kaine, I wonder at the wisdom of the wholly unlikeable mini-story, which simply served to make me happy he sacrificed the way he did. *

*New, later addition to this thought. At some point, Kaine calls himself a "soulless" creature because he's a clone, a mere shell of a man, etc., etc. Can I just say how much I hate this trope? Clones certainly have souls. Or maybe this is where I show my Unitarian upbringing, because I believe if you do good work that's close enough. So, live well, clone, and you shall be a real boy and have a soul!


Thor (#1): Straczynski/Coipel
Thor (#2): Straczynski/Coipel
Thor (#3): Straczynski/Coipel
Thor (#4): Straczynski/Coipel
Thor (#5): Straczynski/Coipel
Thor (#6): Straczynski/Coipel
Thor (#7): Straczynski/Djurdjevic
Thor (#8): Straczynski/Djurdjevic

People have been recommending these to me for a while, and I found this bundle on sale together at HPB. I have NEVER been a Thor fan. Straczynski, IMHO, had the sense to bring back Thor’s human counterpart Dr. Donald Blake, which helped one of my underlining problem with the title previously – relating to a Norse god isn’t easy for a mortal like me. Spider-Man deals with the kinds of things I do: mortgage/rent, keeping a job, getting along with a spouse/lover; Thor, not so much. I don’t really worry about Ragnarok much, frankly. So, bringing Blake back as the human side of Thor helped tremendously.
As with much of Straczynski’s comic work, I appreciated a lot of the little touches. I liked that Straczynski updated Blake to be a “Doctors without Borders” member. His relationship with his old lover was also wonderfully complicated by the reincarnation story and the fact that Blake is Thor to the point of obsession about Thor’s lover, rather than thinking about his own.

Speaking of the reincarnation storyline, I ALWAYS appreciate reincarnation stories that allow for gender shifts. (One of my favorites, a DC title: Camelot 3000.) I totally happen to buy into the choice Straczynski made, too.


Amazing Spider-Man Presents: American Son (1 of 4), Reed/Briones
Amazing Spider-Man Presents: American Son (3 of 4), Reed/Briones
Amazing Spider-Man Presents: American Son (4 of 4), Reed/Briones

This series follows Norman Osbourne’s son(s) after the elder’s fall from grace as the former head of the Avengers/S.H.I.E.L.D. I’ve always enjoyed a good villain, though Green Goblin was never a favorite, not like say Magneto or Dr. Doom. I think it’s the crazy, honestly. Though kudos to Reed for taking on the whole complexity of being a villain’s kid. I found some of the relationships confusing, since I own, but have not yet read “One Last Day.” MJ with Osbourne, Jr.? Srsly?

Then, though these aren’t precisely a grouping, I also read:

The Heroic Age Steve Rogers: Super-Soldier (#1), Brubaker/Eaglesham

The Heroic Age Captain America (#606), “No Escape, Part 1,” Brubaker/Guice
The Heroic Age Captain America (#608), “No Escape, Part 3,” Brubaker/Guice

I have to admit to not knowing why these titles fall under this new “The Heroic Age” banner -- perhaps to distinguish them from the popular “Ultimates”? I have no idea. Okay, never mind. I just Googled “Heroic Age + Marvel,” because I can from home now and I’m disappointed to see that Marvel has plans to make the future bright and shiny and pull away from strife like the Civil War, Secret Invasion, the Death of Captain America and other fantastically awesome writing. Oh, wait, they didn’t say that last part, but it was pretty much implied. This is sad to me. I like dark and real.

Anyway, in Super-Soldier we find Steve Rogers trying to be a superhero without being Captain America. He doesn’t have much of a problem. ‘Nuff said.

Meanwhile, James “Bucky” Buchannan is having a MUCH harder time figuring out how to be Captain America, especially when Baron Zemo, Jr. exposes his past as Soviet era assassin to the press. Yikes! (Side note: is it true? Did Bucky also get the super-soldier formula? I thought only Steve did. In fact, one of the things I like about the new Cap is that he really doesn’t have superpowers outside of the one Soviet cybernetic arm.)

Of the two, I’m actually more interested in Bucky’s storyline, which makes me wonder. Am I really a Captain America fan, or did I really only like Winter Soldier?????

*gasp!*

Iron Man 2

May. 11th, 2010 09:25 am
lydamorehouse: (cap)
Last night I got out to see IRON MAN 2 with my usual Marvel buddy, [livejournal.com profile] seanmmurphy. I know a lot of people are more lukewarm about this installment, but I enjoyed it tremendously. Of course, I'll say without spoiling that the cross-over-y bits were lovely, and I can only hope that this grand experiment Marvel seems to be up to actually works.

I have my doubts.

Thing is, I think they have a misunderstanding of movie-goers and Americans, in general. Like I told [livejournal.com profile] seanmmurphy last night, my agent speculated that one of the reasons Penguin was done with my Garnet Lacey series was because I'd committed the cardinal sin of marrying the two love interests. _Everyone knows_ you can no longer have fun, spark or excitment once you're in a committed relationship. I'd really hoped to prove them wrong. Because, for me, after twenty four years, I'm still head over heels, crazy in love. Every day is an adventure BECAUSE she's with me, BECAUSE of our history.

But the larger issue is that it has been established that romances are about "first blush," NEW love. American culture is very much about the new and improved. Throw out the old. Get the divorce and find the new, better, stronger, faster lover.

I think one of the reasons for that is because we don't have a lot of successful stories about romance between committed partners. The writers of the movie Titanic ignored one of the true life romances of that disaster (Mr. and Mrs. Strauss, an older couple, who stayed together and died together because they refused to be parted) and made up a more palatiable romance for American audiences (which was both forbidden -- by class -- and new and young.)

This relates to IRON MAN 2, how? Well, Marvel is expecting people to commit to characters. "Lost" and other serial TV shows have to give you the "previously, on 'Lost'..." bits because they know Americans audiences have etch-a-sketch brains. If it didn't just happen, they don't remember it. (By Americans, I mean, of course the general, average viewer. It is well established that fan brains are different. We have a legendary/notorious retention of storyline details and we are more comfortable with going with what's not familiar for a lot longer than the average reader/viewer.)

I don't know what that's going to be like, if, several years from now, they do success in making the Avengers movie. There's going to have to start being more than just a few hints and cameos.

And then there's going to be trouble.

Hollywood does NOT like ensemble casts. This to me is the reason for the relative failure of movies like THE FANTASTIC FOUR and SERENITY. It should be noted that I liked both movies, though I found them problematic. The problems centered around this issue. I think both tried too hard to fit the classic Hollywood mold and be about ONE character having ONE problem. The FF are a team AND a family. Their story needs to involve every character equally. Same was true of "Firefly" the TV show, which didn't translate well when they tried to make it mostly just about Captain tightpants/Mal.

So will Marvel be able to pull of an ensemble cast of big name actors all together on one screen? I don't know. I hope they can buck all the trends.
lydamorehouse: (more cap)
So as I mentioned HPB, that means I have some comic books to review. I seem to pick these things up with accidental themes, though this set was perhaps more obvious. This time, it was villains. This is a particular favorite subject of mine, because way back in the 90s, I answered a Marvel survey in one of the many X-Titles Shawn and I were reading during college that asked what superheroes we thought should get their own series. I suggested Magneto.

Thus, even though it meant breaking from my usual stable of writers, I simply had to pick up Greg Pak’s (June 2009):

X-Men: Magneto. “Testament” (2 of 5)
X-Men: Magneto. “Testament” (3 of 5)

And, then, since I was on a villainous theme, as I said, I got Ed Brubaker’s (2006):

Books of Doom (1 of 6)
Books of Doom (3 of 6)
Books of Doom (4 of 6)

After reading these, I decided that the first ingredient to being a Marvel supervillain is to be born into a historically persecuted people -- Magneto being a German Jew, and Victor Von Doom who is gypsy/Romany.

After that, I don’t really know what it’s going to take to be one of the two ultimate bad a$$ bad guy (though apparently deals with dark demons help significantly), as I didn’t get very far along in the stories. Between them, I’ll tell you, I’m more interested in Magneto. I’ve always been a Doom fan, but he’s MUCH tougher to sympathize with. I dunno, maybe it’s the whole speaking of himself in the third person thing and lines like, “Where before, though my heart was not filled with pity for the mass of humankind… now I found I looked at them as nothing more than gnats fluttering in my way.” (Books of Doom, 4 of 6)

When I was a kid, the one Marvel novel I read was the origin story of Doom, which at the time, I enjoyed tremendously. When I like him, he’s written as a sort of stand in for Lucifer: proud and arrogant and secretly kind of sexy. As I may have confessed before, I like the Doom who isn’t scarred by the college explosion at all, but merely so vain that he hides his face because he considers a tiny scar a horrible disfigurement. This goes with my whole “evil should be beautiful and seductive” theme. I like it in my Satan, and I like it with Doom.

Plus, on a completely superficial note, I think Doom has some of the best hair in the Marvel Universe. It’s always been that awesome auburn color, and wavy in just the right way. (Worst hair: Daredevil. Bad color, bad cut. Yeah, I know he’s blind, but his hair stylist isn’t!) And, while there’s one sexy scene in 3 that shows Doom’s hair off the way I like it, Brubaker couldn’t make me like Doom --which is fairly amazing when you consider he made me like Bucky.

The only scene I really sort of appreciated was when the KGB approached him to try to get him to work for the Soviets – which instantly spurred “What if?” in my head. As a child of the Cold War, I occasionally have a nostalgic yen for Migs and Red Stars and the great, mysterious enemy that the Soviets once represented. I found out on MySpace that Brubaker and I were born in the same month of the same year, so maybe it’s a generational thing.

Meanwhile, the Magneto books are developing a very sympathetic character. I mean it’s hard not to feel pathos about Magneto’s early days, even if all you know is that he grew up as a Jew in WWII and his latent mutant powers saved him from being shot to death when his family was lined up by a Nazi firing squad. The person Pak develops in the few issues I found is someone breaking under the pressure of being constrained by having to not fight back against the evil oppressors in order to save his family from repercussions -- even though, in the end, they die anyway. You can kind of get how Magneto might end up a roiling mess of “f-you, oppressors of any sort! Watch me rip the iron from your blood!”

Pak, of course, has a bit more wiggle room with Magneto’s character because, despite being the founder of the “Brotherhood of *EVIL* Mutants,” Magneto has also semi-successfully played for our team on and off. Magneto’s main conflict has always to do with a basic activist question: whether you should have justice at any cost, or whether you should play by the rules and change attitudes towards race/gayness/other civil rights issue, er, I mean, “mutants” incrementally. When Marvel writes him well, this issue isn’t as simple as it may appear, and thus his status as super_villain_ isn’t as black and white, as say Dr. Doom’s .

When we were out at Barnes & Noble on Saturday, I unsuccessfully combed the graphic novel sections in both used and new for the rest of the “Testament” series. I may have to break down and make my way over to Dreamhaven and see if they have it. I’d really like to see what happens to Magneto in this miniseries. Looks like, if I have to, I can still get it on Amazon in its collected format.

I also found several Captain America issues that catch me (sort of) up to date on that title, but they may deserve a post all their own.
lydamorehouse: (cap)
As I noted below, Shawn and I spent her birthday shopping. We spotted a HalfPrice Books in Roseville we’d never seen before -- though, according to the clerk, they’ve been there for two and a half years. For us, it was like a mirage appearing in the desert.

Anyway, Shawn checked out the new releases and I headed for comics. I found some Brubaker DAREDEVILs and ran into my friend and fellow writer Bob Subiaga, who was also hunting for cheap, used comics. He and I chatted, and I left with more stuff for me and Mason than for Shawn, alas.

When Shawn went to Kohls to shop for costume jewelry earrings, I sat in the car and read DAREDEVIL:

#84 / “The Devil in Cell-Block D” (part 3)
#85 / “The Devil in Cell-Block D” (part 4)
#86 / “The Devil in Cell-Block D” (part 5)
#87 / “The Devil in Cell-Block D” (finale)
#88 / “The Secret Life of Foggie Nelson”
#89 / “The Devil Takes a Ride” (part 1 of 5)
#105 / “Without Fear” (part 3 of 6)

I was never much of a Daredevil fan in my youth. I think used to perceive Daredevil as somewhat inscrutable (as he points out in one of the above, it’s not *his* thing to fight and talk) and, because he’s always portrayed as a serious loner, he wasn’t much fun to pretend to be when playing superheroes. My cousin and I used to prefer superheroes who were already part of a team (Avengers, X-Men, Fantastic Four) or gregarious enough to blend into an existing group, ala Spider-Man.

Plus, like Tony Stark/Iron Man, I’m never really sure how “good” Daredevil is. He’s always been out there as a vigilante – which is one of the things that I’ve always disliked about DC’s Batman (who is probably the closest DC analog to Daredevil, or visa versa since Batman came first.) But it’s more than that. I was doing the dishes just now trying to figure out why I have so much trouble sympathizing with Batman and, by extension, Daredevil.

I think you can judge the quality of a hero by his enemies. My favorite heroes fight my favorite villains. My favorite villains are often tragic in some way. Dr. Doom could have been a friend to Mr. Fantastic if only his pride and arrogance hadn’t consumed him so totally (and pride, as you may have guessed, is a sin I’m quite fond of.) Victor von Doom is what Reed Richards could be, but for the grace of god.

Likewise, Magneto is kind of the mutant version of Malcolm X (Professor X being Martin Luther King, Jr.). He wants freedom and equality for mutants, damn the cost (or screw humanity, as the case may be). Yet, often, Magneto makes a compelling argument, which is what makes him interesting to me. Professor X and Magneto are two sides of the same coin. Both want a word with mutant equality, they just have different methods.

The enemies of Daredevil (and the enemies of Batman) scare the crap out of me. Kingpin is a ruthless mob boss; the Joker is insane. If you go with my idea that enemies make the hero, than what does that say about Daredevil or Batman? There but for the grace of god you have a ruthless killer (Daredevil) and an insane megalomaniac (Batman).

You can kind of see it, can’t you?

Despite my deep reservations about Daredevil, I liked what Brubaker did (for the most part “quantum bullets” aside,) with the CAPTAIN AMERICA storyline, so I thought I’d give his DAREDEVIL a try. I enjoyed what I read as a story, but I’m still not terribly sold on Daredevil as a character.

By accident this set of DAREDEVILs and the Straczynski AMAZING SPIDER-MANs that I picked up earlier shared a common theme, which could be summed up in the question: what could make a superhero break (and become a villain)?

Interestingly, both answered basically the same way -- someone you love must die/or be dying.

For Daredevil, it’s his long-time law partner/bromance Foggie Nelson, who gets “shanked” while visiting Matt Murdock in prison. To be fair, Foggie’s apparent death is, for Matt, likely just the final the nail in the coffin. Getting sent to Riker’s Island is probably just as difficult, especially given that even without people knowing/suspecting that he’s Daredevil, as a lawyer, he helped put a lot of the inmates there in the first place.

Just as I suspected, in the darkness, Daredevil’s true character comes out, and I don’t like him. Over the course of the six part arc, we watch Matt slip closer and closer to becoming a cold-hearted, ruthless killer. It takes a wake-up call from the Punisher (of all people!) to shake him out of an unholy alliance with Kingpin _and_ Bullseye.

If I were more of a Daredevil fan, I’d appreciate this look into Matthew Murdock’s soul. But I’ve known it was dark and twisted there since reading the “Saints and Sinners” storyline back in the 90s (or 80s… whenever that was.)

I think I found Spider-Man’s struggles/descent into madness/criminal behavior more interesting simply because I like Peter Parker better. However, I can’t say it’s because his villains are favorites, though it’s notable that Doc Ock is a messed up, brilliant scientist and Peter certainly could have gone down that road. It’s actually kind of hard to point to just one darker version/antithesis of Spider-Man. His enemies are Legion, as it were. Perhaps his most persistent villain is the Green Goblin, and that wouldn’t say anything particularly nice about Petey – except, perhaps, that any evil he does, he does without knowing and that basically, at heart, he’s a good guy.

Okay, maybe it says a LOT.

Both the Green Goblin and Spider-Man have “daddy issues,” both making them essentially who they are. I can actually sympathize with Green Goblin when he’s Ozzy Osbourne (or even his father.) So my theory holds.

And yet no one has invited me to attend ComicCon; what’s up with that? *teasing*
lydamorehouse: (Default)
I picked up Mason early yesterday and we headed over to HPB in Highland. He really wanted to see what they had for GOOSEBUMPS and STAR WARS. We picked up a Kevin J. Anderson (Heir to the Empire series?) and the two Horrorland Goosebumps they had. Then I asked Mason where he wanted to go, and he suggested Bass Lake. But he burst into tears when he realized he'd left his stuffed bunny, Sirralbuoyadoh (named after a girl in his class) behind. After a little back and forth, I agreed to turn around for her. (He needed to change out of school clothes for a woods romp, anyway.)

Mason has NEVER been much for stuffed animals. People have given him tons over the years, but he's never seemed to understand what to _do_ with them. He tends to prefer toys he can build things with or otherwise manipulate towards some _purpose_. Ms. Sirr is the one exception. She is a very realistic rabbit hand puppet (though Mason asked us to sew up the part you put your hand into, and asked if she could have anethesia for the "surgery.") He actually talks to her and plays with her, which is kind of a relief to me.... because I remember doing things like that with my various stuffed animals as a kid and Mason never seemed, like I said, to get it.

Anyway, turns out it was important to get Ms. Sirr because she had been "asking" Mason to take her back to her roots, aka the forest. He'd read on her tag that she was a Dutch rabbit, and kept asking me if I thought these woods were enough like those for her to feel at home. Mostly, though, once we got to Bass Lake he got more into tromping about and getting full of burrs. We tucked Ms. Sirr into his hoodie and she rode along, kind of like a baby in a Bjorn. I got some really cute pictures of the two of them.

Last night, I actually took a short break from writing (what? I deserved it! I wrote 3,000 words, which, for me, is HUGE for one day's work) to watch "Wolverine" with Shawn on DVD. I enjoyed the movie in the theater, but I forgot who the true Wolverine fan was in the house. Shawn collected all the Wolverine issues when he spawned off his own title in the early 90s.

All through the movie, she kept shaking her head. We both lamented the lack of even a MENTION of his time in Alpha Flight and the lack of Domino in Weapon X. But while she really enjoyed the opening, Shawn just couldn't brook with all the liberties taken with the timeline (and who knew whom and when). We both agreed, however, that it was surprisingly pleasant to discover that Liev Schiber inhabited the role of Sabertooth in the same way that Hugh Jackman is Wolverine.

And she did appreciate a lot of the visuals (ehm, who wouldn't like more naked Hugh Jackman??) but also how satisfying it was to see him come out of the adamantium tank-thingie with THE CLAWS. There were a lot of "ah, the jacket" and "OMG! The belt buckle!"

She did point out that the setting is actually kind of confusing. Is it supposed to be the 70s throughout the movie? Wolverine is in the Canadian rockies some few years after Vietnam and sometimes the fashion seemed very late 70s, but then there were Hummers and all sorts of other anachronisms.

Ah well.

Anyway, speaking of writing, I'm behind so I must go write, write, write.
lydamorehouse: (cap)
Mason and I discovered a new favorite hiking spot last Saturday: Bass Lake. Bass Lake is part of the Minnesota Valley Wildlife Preserve, and it actually right around the corner from the Mall of America. It’s not very large. An intrepid explorer could easily see the entire trail in under an hour, but Mason is a wanderer and a lingerer, so it’s actually quite perfect for us. We also happened to go on a day when the Fish and Wildlife folks were setting up stations for a fishing camp for kids, and we got to help one woman set up her station by using a net to see what we could get out of the pond. Mason netted baby fish (fry), a tadpole, lots and lots of bugs, duckweed, and other things quite fascinating to a six year old.

We also tried to spend Mason’s three dollar coupons at HalfPrice Books, but Mason was the king of indecision that day. We’d earlier gone to the library, where he read the back copy of all the Goosebumps books that they had there, but then claimed to not be interested in them and put them back on the shelf. While I was waiting for him at the library, I picked up and started to read a manga they had there: HIRARA NO GO #6 (Yumi Hotta / Takeshi Obata). Of course, coming in on the sixth issue, I didn’t really know what it was about except that there was a major “go” (strategy game involving black and white stones) competition, a ghost (?), and a rivalry between two boys (one professional level, the other just starting a special “go” school). I found it engaging enough that I may check out the next one in the series, if they have it. Alas, they seemed to have a spotty collection.

At HalfPrice Books, Mason dithered over their Goosebumps, while I scoured the shelves for more JMS. As it happened, one of the employees had hauled out a huge box of graphic novels and was rearranging the graphic novel section. She kindly let me look over her shoulder at the Marvel titles. I picked up FANTASTIC FOUR Volume 1 (#527 - #532) by J. Michael Straczynski and THE AVENGERS: Disassembled (#500- 504 “Finale”) by Brian Michael Bendis.

When I started reading the FF, I realized I’d actually read a couple of these at some point because I remembered the whole arc where the child protective services woman comes and tells Sue Richards that maybe the life of the superhero parents isn’t all that great for raising kids, and that maybe Franklin and Val would be better off in a foster home. Of course, as they’re talking all sorts of crazy is happening at the Baxter Building. Again, it’s that kind of “real life” moment that I appreciate Straczynski for.

The larger story wasn’t as compelling for me, although Straczynski does try to explain one of the great mysteries of the FF universe – why did four people all bombarded by the SAME gamma rays end up with different powers? And why were these gamma rays so dang special anyway, since Earth is hit with gamma rays all the time?! (Oh, and he also tries to answer the BIG question of how did the universe start, but...) I’m not sure I bought his answer -- that the gamma rays were actually communication sent by an intelligent life form? And the power of Creation, ie, “The Word” of Reed Richards picked out personality traits that colored each person’s power? But, you know, it was a fine installment.

I’d been sort of on the look out for Bendis’ AVENGERS: DISASSEMBLED since I fist read about the aftermath in NEW AVENGERS: BREAKOUT.

If you don’t know the story, the short version is that the Scarlet Witch, a mutant whose powers are reality-altering “magic,” flips out. A pregnancy scare by Jan /“The Wasp” (who, apparently, was sleeping with Hawkeye at this point) triggers a memory for Wanda that involves some children she completely invented, literally out of thin air – because, you know, she married an android. He might be a lovin’ machine, but Vision ain’t no baby-makin’ machine.

Anyway, perhaps because the Avengers conspired to make her “forget” the whole baby incident, she decides it’s time for the worst to happen – she’s going to kill them, kill them all. Unbeknowst to the Avengers, crap starts happening. Tony Stark seems to have a drunken ramble at a UN meeting where he, among other things, insults the diplomat from Latvaria (Dr. Doom’s homeland). Some dead dude shows up as a human bomb and the mansion blows up. People die. Vision appears and launches a zillion Voltrons. The She-Hulk goes ape-sh*t. The Kree seem to invade --except SHIELD can’t pick them up on radar at all. More people die. Things are getting like crazy-insane. Even the Avengers have to admit that maybe this is more than just a really, REALLY bad day.

That’s when Dr. Strange’s astral form tells them that this has all been magic. (What? You were expecting a telegram?) Oh well, that’s great, everyone says, you can just wave a wand and fix it. Nope, he says, this is real. It was just caused by magic, special mutant magic... *cough*like Scarlet Witch’s*cough*

Everyone goes into full denial mode that all this could be caused by one of their own, and this leads to one of my favorite moments, where Spider-Man points out, as I did above, that, you know, she *did* marry a robot. How sane is that? Everyone stares at him like he just insulted their mother, and he mutters in a very Spider-Man way about how he’s sure people talk about the stupid things *he’s* done. It made me laugh. Actually, it made me poke Shawn in the ribs and read it to her. (Which she ALWAYS appreciates, I’m sure.)

Anyway, it reminded me that I like a lot of Bendis’ work. I just couldn’t cope with the Skrull invasion.

Yesterday we had a great time at Minihaha and I'll have a report on that, as well as comments on the new stuff we picked up today as part of our grand book adventure day!
lydamorehouse: (Default)
To continue an argument I had with Pat Rothfuss at CONvergence, I have to say that really smart writing never gets the credit it deserves. I’m not talking about myself, for once, either.

The panel was entitled "How to Publish and Not Perish," and Pat mistakenly made the point that the first thing a writer needed to do was "write a good book." To which, I immediately countered, "No, sorry. That's not going to save you. Plenty of good books perish, while bad books flourish." At some point during the extended argument, Pat casually brought up the TV show "Firefly," and I pounced: "You mean the show that was cancelled???" I asked, "Doesn't that PROVE my point?" He had to admit I might be on to something there.

"Firefly" is cancelled and reality shows flourish. And Straczynski's AMAZING SPIDER-MAN is no more either. And you know what? That's a crime. That's a bloody, freaking crime.

Yesterday I stopped by HalfPrice books again because the deadline for turning in the "Feed Your Brain" scorecards to get $3.00 coupons is either today or tomorrow, and I happened to also have a free cat food coupon for PETCO, which is only a few blocks further west. Once again in the used bin at HalfPrice, I found a couple Straczynski SPIDER-MANs. For a whopping seventy-five cents, I got AMAZING SPIDER-MAN #502, which I now consider to be one of the best Spider-Man issues of all time.

In a nutshell, it's the story of the Jewish talior to the superheroes/villians. It's also a story about a core Spider-Man theme, ie "you have a responsiblity to do the right thing when when it sucks to do so." In this case, not just when you have "great power", but also when you have NO POWER. Straczynski also returns to one of his favorite tropes to play with, which is what does it really means to be "the friendly, *neighborhood* Spider-Man." It's a story that's very much about being a New Yorker. I love those.

Tailor: "Hey, Mr. Bug Guy on the roof!"
Spider-Man: "You talking to me?"
Talior: "What, you see another Bug Guy on the roof?"
Spider-Man: "You talking to me?"
Talior: "Yeah, I'm talking to you."

I don't know. It's cheap, but it totally amused me. Plus, I loved that the talior instantly recognized not only that Spider-Man was local to New York, but also that he was from Queens. There were a ton of fun bits like that, including a brief questioning of Thor's manliness based on the kinds of magazines he likes to read while the tailor fixed his costume (gardening and bridal), which I could imagine irritated some. Spider-Man has a favorite diner to go to in costume... tons and tons of things what made me do the happy dance. I loved it. I thought the whole concept and excuition was absolutely brilliant.

I'm just gutted that the time will come when I will run out of Straczynski AMAZING SPIDER-MANs to read. And everything is different now. And Straczynski deserves better. I was a fan of "Babylon 5," but I'm a FANATIC for his Spider-Man issues.

I also picked up AMAZING SPIDER-MAN 39/480 "Meanwhile" and Mason got Marvel Adventures All-Ages SPIDER-MAN #53 "A Sense of Responsiblity" (Tobin), which I'll review at some point. Today I just wanted to whine about how great writing doesn't get no respect!
lydamorehouse: (more cap)
I'll probably shut up about Marvel soon, but hold on a few more posts, will ya? Thing is, this weekend is ComicCon in San Deigo and, well, I'm not there. I'm sublimating, okay? Plus, my editor *is* there. And, really, wish I could figure out how to get that sweet deal. I'd like Penguin USA to send *me* to ComicCon on their check, you know? I don't know how into the comic book/graphic novel scene Anne (my editor) is, but I can help but think I might be just a ticth more "qualified" in the nerd department. Okay, so she represents a publishing house, whatever -- but does she know how many Spider-Womans have appeared in Marvel over time? Does she, huh???

Yeah, Anne, I'm callin' you out!!

But seriously, I've been thinking about those folks who wrote in comments about how they miss the good ol' Marvel Universe, and what should happen yesterday? Mason's subscription to MARVEL ADVENTURES (All-Ages) SUPERHEROES showed up in the mailbox. From what I understand, currently there are three MARVEL ADVENTURES (All-Ages) titles: Avengers, Spider-Man and Superheroes (which replaced Mason's real favorite, the Fantastic Four.) I bring this up because if you're looking for a flashback to the uncorrupted Marvel-verse of the 1960s, this might be your best shot.

If you've been burned hard (and I can understand writing off Marvel forever. I get that way too), this might NOT be of much help. Some of the stories are not only fairly silly, but for us long-time fans they can be repetative since they can also be complete retreds of original storylines with new art and a few more modern bits tossed in.

However, Mason loved the Fantastic Four, and many of them are surprisingly fun and readable for me, as well.

Mason's first real comic book experience (thank you Target) was actually an adult title: Michael Bendis' NEW AVENGERS "Breakout" which, despite the foul language and entirely adult situations, he still loves with a desperation that, if I weren't also a fellow geek, would be difficult to comprehend. The second was a compliation of the more science fiction-y All-Ages MARVEL ADVENTURES of the Fantastic Four, which is another comic book that he can actually quote several panels from (his favorite being the awakening of the sentient planet "Ego.") Both "Breakout" and Fantastic Four get re-read a lot, though now that he actually knows how a$$ is pronounced (he used to say "iss") we keep "Breakout" on a higher shelf and ask that he read it with one of us, so we can talk about the more adult situtations.

Mason is also a huge fan of Dave Sharpe, the letterer of many of the All-ages MARVEL ADVENTURES titles. Yes, that's what I said, "the letterer," as in the guy who prints the words. Don't ask me how this happened. I don't know. There are many parts of Mason's personal experience with fandom that are, in fact, quite beyond my realm of experience, but suffice to say when he was younger, he would ask me to make up stories that involved Dave Sharpe (they'd usually be Dave Sharpe at the drawing board misspelling words or writing in wrong, silly alternate words and having to crumple up entire pages... for some reason Mason found this absolutely hillarious.) So, Dave Sharpe? Your work is not unappreciated. You have an almost-six year old fan in Saint Paul, Minnesota who looks for YOUR NAME first in any comic book he receives. No kiddin'

As a side note, I find is sort of fascinating that my current obsession with comic books conicides with my joyful return to work on the Archangel Protocol prequel. Coincidence? I'm not sure.
lydamorehouse: (cap)
[livejournal.com profile] wyldemusick just gave me the ten cent tour of the latest happenings in AMAZING SPIDER-MAN since Straczynski's departure from that title, and all I have to say is: wtf??

As I said in my reply coments, I actually find myself feeling mildly depressed. I was on-line ridiculously early this morning and so read [livejournal.com profile] wyldemusick's comment while my family busied themselves with the business of getting dressed and ready for the day, and consequently I've been thinking about this EVER SINCE.

I won't tell you specifics, because as [livejournal.com profile] skylarker reminded me, this sort of thing definitely falls into the realm of spoilers, but, MAN. What I want to talk about instead is, perhaps, more universal to the experience of being a fan.

It surprises me just how much I CARE. These people are completely made up, I realize that, really, I do... but, like any good long-running series, I have developed a personal history with these characters. I feel like I KNOW Peter Parker. More than that, Peter Parker has been in my life, on and off, since 1978 (or there abouts, when my cousin Laun took me into his basement where his father had their collection of comicbooks, which includes some of the very FIRST issues of many long-running titles, like X-Men and Fantastic Four, which his dad lovingly collected in the 1960s. I can not say for certain that Laun has the AMAZING which has Spider-Man's first appearance, but I'm sure he has the first Spider-Man comic that was its own title.) I have touched (and read) some of these very first appearances. My memory for them is nothing like my cousin's. I can not tell you the inker or the artist (unless, of course, it's someone iconic like, say, Jack Kirby) or even most writers... because as a kid that stuff matter much less to me than the STORY.

As I suggested in my reply, I love it when writers (like Straczinsky, who is clearly also a long-time fan) remembers and makes off-handed references to Spidey's history. In one of the issues I have (it might even be in a Bendis NEW AVENGERS), Peter Parker is talking to Tony Stark about his screwed up biology and says, "once I even had six arms." Which made me smile because I could see that cover art clearly in my head.

I hate game-changers. The Skrull Invasion eventually tested my patience because (and this was a long enough time ago, I think, [livejournal.com profile] skylarker, that I can just say this out loud) it expected me to potentially believe that many characters had been imposers for several generations.

I gave up on DC when they kept rebooting classic heros, like Superman (and yes, I think that was some time in the 70s or 80s.) I have no issue with risk-taking (like the Civil War or killing off Captain America, both of which, in fact I loved,) or even stretching out and deepening existing "beliefs" (like wondering if Spidey's powers are totemic magic or just radiation.) But expecting me to abandon much of what I've come to know about characters just... well, depresses me. I could have survived Skrull Invasion, except that it ended up feeling cheap to me, not unlike, say, making a deal with the devil. If the consequences are explored deeply enough, I can roll with just about anything.

Ah, well. I may have to just keep living in Spidey's past until some revamps his world again. Luckly, I'm sitll plenty far behind. I can live in the past for YEARS.

June 2017

S M T W T F S
     1 23
4 56 789 10
11 1213 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 2324
252627282930 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 28th, 2017 07:12 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios